House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


S.C.B.

225

 
 

House of Commons

 
 

Thursday 16th March 2006

 

Standing Committee Proceedings

 

Standing Committee B

 

Children and Adoption Bill [Lords]


 

[Third and Fourth Sittings]


 

Beverley Hughes

 

Agreed to

 

That the Order of the Committee of 13th March 2006 be amended by—

 

(a)  

the insertion after paragraph (1)(b)—

 

                                          “(c)         at 10.30 a.m. and 4.00 p.m. on Tuesday 21st March;”,

 

and

 

(b)  

the substitution in paragraph (3) of “7.00 p.m. on Tuesday 21st March”

 

for “4.00 p.m. on Thursday 16th March”.

 


 

Margaret Moran

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr David Kidney

 

Withdrawn  34

 

Clause  4,  page  7,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

In deciding whether a person had reasonable excuse for failing to comply with a

 

contact order, the court shall consider

 

(a)    

any objections from the child about the contact arrangements, and

 

(b)    

the behaviour of the contact parent.

 

(3B)    

No court may make an enforcement order as regards a person in breach of a

 

contact order unless,

 

(a)    

it has considered an assessment of the risk to the child concerned and of

 

any person with whom the child has his home, and

 

(b)    

it is satisfied that the safety of the child of any person with who the child

 

has his home will not be compromised by making an enforcement order.’.


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 16th March 2006            

226

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Negatived on division  49

 

Clause  4,  page  7,  line  25,  at end insert—

 

‘(4A)    

When considering whether to make an enforcement order, the Court shall have

 

regard to the principle that, subject to the welfare of the child, the court acts on

 

the presumption that a child’s welfare is best served through reasonable contact

 

with both his parents unless good reason to the contrary is shown.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Withdrawn  64

 

Clause  4,  page  7,  leave out line 34.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  65

 

Clause  4,  page  7,  line  35,  leave out subsections (6) and (7).

 

Annette Brooke

 

Sandra Gidley

 

Withdrawn  26

 

Clause  4,  page  8,  line  15,  at end insert—

 

‘(14)    

In considering whether to make an enforcement of a contact order, the welfare of

 

the child concerned is to be the court’s paramount consideration.’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Withdrawn  3

 

Clause  4,  page  8,  line  30,  leave out ‘18’ and insert ‘16’.

 

Annette Brooke

 

Not called  29

 

Clause  4,  page  8,  line  46,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

In considering whether to make an enforcement order the court shall take into

 

account the need for separate representation of the child and his interests.’.

 

Margaret Moran

 

Not called  39

 

Clause  4,  page  9,  leave out lines 18 to 20 and insert—

 

‘(7)    

In making an enforcement order in relation to a contact order, the welfare of the

 

child concerned is to be the court’s paramount consideration.’.


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 16th March 2006            

227

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Clause Agreed to.

 

Schedule 1 Agreed to.

 


 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Withdrawn  50

 

Clause  5,  page  10,  line  7,  after ‘suffered’, insert ‘significant’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  8

 

Clause  5,  page  10,  line  8,  at end insert ‘including the costs incurred by initiating

 

court action if subsequently upheld,’.

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Withdrawn  63

 

Clause  5,  page  10,  line  15,  after ‘excuse’, insert ‘and the standard of proof is the

 

balance of probabilities’.

 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  51

 

Clause  5,  page  10,  line  26,  leave out subsections (7) and (8).

 

Margaret Moran

 

Not called  40

 

Clause  5,  page  10,  leave out lines 43 to 44 and insert—

 

‘(14)    

In exercising its powers under this section, the welfare of the child concerned is

 

to be the court’s paramount consideration.’.

 

Annette Brooke

 

Sandra Gidley

 

Not selected  27

 

Clause  5,  page  10,  line  44,  at end insert—

 

‘(15)    

In considering compensation for financial loss, the welfare of the child concerned

 

is to be the court’s paramount consideration.’.


 
 

S.C.B.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 16th March 2006            

228

 

Children and Adoption Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Tim Loughton

 

Mrs Maria Miller

 

Mr Stewart Jackson

 

Jeremy Wright

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  4

 

Clause  5,  page  11,  line  17,  leave out ‘18’ and insert ‘16’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 

[Adjourned till Tuesday next at 10.30 a.m.


 
contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 17 March 2006