House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


S.C.E.

149

 
 

House of Commons

 
 

Tuesday 2nd May 2006

 

Standing Committee Proceedings

 

Standing Committee E

 

Education and Inspections Bill


 

[Thirteenth and Fourteenth Sittings]


 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Withdrawn  441

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  7,  at beginning insert ‘Until the school year starting on or

 

after 1st August 2010,’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  209

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  7,  at end insert ‘or an academy’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  230

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  7,  at end insert ‘, academy, city technology college or city

 

college for the technology of the arts.’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  210

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  8,  leave out from ‘ability’ to end of line 11 and insert ‘or

 

aptitude unless selection is for the purpose of section 101 (permitted selection: pupil

 

banding) of SSFA 1998.’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not called  367

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  11,  at end insert ‘, or

 

(c)    

the school is a comprehensive with a grammar stream.’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  442

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  11,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

The admission authority for each secondary school, in exercising their functions,

 

shall—

 

(a)    

have regard to the general principle that secondary education is to be

 

provided in comprehensive schools, and

 

(b)    

determine that arrangements for the admission of pupils for compulsory

 

education is not based on any test of ability or aptitude,


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

150

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

    

except where the admission arrangements have been determined under section

 

101 of SSFA (pupil banding) or regulations made under section [Retention of

 

selection by ability or aptitude after parent ballot].’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not called  368

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  13,  leave out ‘or any’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Negatived on division  45

 

Clause  36,  page  26,  line  28,  at end insert ‘and

 

(c)    

in subsection (4), after paragraph (b) insert—

 

“(c)    

any selection of 10 per cent of pupils by aptitude in a

 

subject that is a compulsory target-setting subject for the

 

purposes of the specialist schools programme.”.’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not selected  195

 

Page  26,  line  6,  leave out Clause 36.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Withdrawn  444

 

Clause  37,  page  26,  line  38,  after ‘requirements,’, insert ‘including the use of

 

oversubscription criteria set out in subsection (2A),’.

 

Sarah Teather

 

Greg Mulholland

 

Annette Brooke

 

Not called  435

 

Clause  37,  page  26,  line  39,  at end insert ‘including practices prohibited by

 

regulation,’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  445

 

Clause  37,  page  26,  line  39,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

After subsection (2) insert—

 

“(2A)    

The oversubscription criteria referred to in subsection (2) are to be

 

applied in the following order—

 

(a)    

children with a statement of special educational needs;

 

(b)    

children in public care;

 

(c)    

children for whom the school is most appropriate on medical or

 

social grounds;


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

151

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

(d)    

children whose sibling or siblings will be enrolled at the school

 

on the first day of term and who permanently reside within the

 

area from which the school’s intake is normally drawn;

 

(e)    

children for whom the school is the nearest appropriate school to

 

their home;

 

(f)    

safe walking distance from the school;

 

(g)    

ease of access to the school by public transport;

 

(h)    

transfer from a named feeder primary school.”.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Negatived on division  407

 

Clause  37,  page  26,  leave out line 40.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  211

 

Clause  37,  page  26,  line  40,  leave out ‘act in accordance’ and insert ‘comply in all

 

respects’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  231

 

Clause  37,  page  26,  line  40,  at end insert ‘; and after “code” insert “and in the case

 

of a local education authority to establish and maintain a local admissions policy in

 

compliance with the code”.’.

 

Jacqui Smith

 

Agreed to  427

 

Clause  37,  page  27,  line  11,  at end insert—

 

‘(9)    

In relation to a code for school admissions issued under section 84(1) of SSFA

 

1998 after the passing of this Act, the requirement to consult which is imposed by

 

section 85(2) of SSFA 1998 may be satisfied by consultation undertaken before

 

the passing of this Act, even though the code takes account (to any extent) of any

 

provision made by this Act.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not selected  46

 

Page  26,  line  29,  leave out Clause 37.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  232

 

Clause  38,  page  27,  line  17,  leave out ‘, and’ and insert—

 

‘(ba)    

in the case of an admission forum for the area of a local education

 

authority in England, to advise the authority on the local admissions


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

152

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

policy established and maintained by the authority under section 84(3),

 

and’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  233

 

Clause  38,  page  27,  line  18,  leave out from ‘forum’ to ‘exercising’ in line 19 and

 

insert ‘such as is mentioned in paragraph (ba)’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Withdrawn  212

 

Clause  38,  page  27,  line  24,  leave out from ‘England’ to end of line 26 and insert

 

‘shall consider the report published by the local education authority under section 85C

 

(admissions report by local education authority) and prepare and publish its response to

 

this report, which may include rejection, as may be prescribed.’.

 

Sarah Teather

 

Greg Mulholland

 

Annette Brooke

 

Withdrawn  437

 

Clause  38,  page  27,  line  25,  after ‘schools’, insert ‘, academies, city technology

 

colleges and city colleges for the technology of the arts’.

 

Sarah Teather

 

Greg Mulholland

 

Annette Brooke

 

Not called  438

 

Clause  38,  page  27,  line  34,  after ‘school’, insert ‘, academy, city technology

 

college or city college for the technology of the arts’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  234

 

Clause  38,  page  28,  line  11,  at end insert—

 

‘(5C)    

An admission forum shall, in the exercise of its functions, have regard to any

 

admissions policy of the local education authority responsible for maintaining

 

schools in the area for which the forum is established.’

 

Sarah Teather

 

Greg Mulholland

 

Annette Brooke

 

Not selected  517

 

Page  27,  line  12,  leave out Clause 38.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Withdrawn  446

 

Clause  39,  page  28,  line  41,  leave out first ‘of’ and insert ‘and their’.


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

153

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  447

 

Clause  39,  page  28,  line  42,  leave out ‘them’ and insert ‘parents’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Negatived on division  47

 

Clause  39,  page  28,  line  43,  at end add ‘, such advice to include full information

 

regarding the provision of special schools available in the geographical area.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  192

 

Clause  39,  page  28,  line  43,  at end add ‘, such advice to be monitored and evaluated

 

by the local education authority for its effectiveness, with examples of good practice

 

being collated and disseminated.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  388

 

Clause  39,  page  28,  line  43,  at end add ‘, and no person shall be appointed to

 

provide such advice and assistance unless he has demonstrated an understanding of

 

special educational needs and disability legislation.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not selected  448

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  4,  leave out ‘No’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Negatived on division  204

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  4,  after ‘school’, insert ‘(except a school to which this

 

section does not apply)’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not selected  449

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  4,  after ‘may’, insert ‘not’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  213

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  5,  after ‘interview’, insert ‘or written test’.


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

154

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

Sarah Teather

 

Greg Mulholland

 

Annette Brooke

 

Not called  436

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  5,  after ‘interview’, insert ‘(whether face to face or by

 

telephone)’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  214

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  6,  after ‘interview’, insert ‘or written test’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  48

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  8,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

If the maintained school is one which has been designated as a school having a

 

religious character in accordance with section 69, subsection (1) does not apply

 

in relation to any interview intended to assess religious committment and

 

religious practice.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  49

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  8,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

Subsection (1) does not apply in relation to any interview conducted to assess

 

intended compliance with a home school contract.’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not called  369

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  12,  at end insert—

 

‘(2A)    

If the maintained school is of a religious character and preference is given to

 

applicants for admission to that school on the basis of the religious practice of the

 

pupil, then subsection (1) does not apply in relation to any interview intended to

 

assess the suitability of the applicant for such a school.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  406

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  15,  at end insert ‘interview,’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  208

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  18,  at end insert—


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

155

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

‘(3A)    

Subsection (1) does not apply to any interview conducted in connection with the

 

admission of pupils to the school for secondary education suitable to the

 

requirements of pupils who are over compulsory school age.’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not called  205

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  20,  at end add—

 

‘(5)    

This section does not apply to a foundation, voluntary-aided or voluntary-

 

controlled school which has been designated by the Secretary of State under

 

section 69 as a school having a religious character.’.

 

Mr David Chaytor

 

Not called  215

 

Clause  40,  page  29,  line  20,  at end add—

 

‘(2)    

In section 482 (academies) of EA 1996, in subsection (2)—

 

(a)    

omit “and” at the end of paragraph (a), and

 

(b)    

after paragraph (b) insert “and

 

(c)    

does not have admission arrangements which require or

 

authorise any interview with an applicant for admission to the

 

academy or his parents, where the interview is to be taken into

 

account (to any extent) in determining whether the applicant is to

 

be admitted to the academy”.’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not selected  196

 

Page  29,  line  1,  leave out Clause 40.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Withdrawn  91

 

Clause  41,  page  29,  line  25,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

In section 89 of SSFA 1998 (procedure for determining admissions

 

arrangements) after subsection (3) insert—

 

“(3A)    

The requirement to consult under subsections (2) and (3) shall not apply

 

where an admissions authority, prior to determining its admission

 

arrangements, decides to make no substantive alterations to its

 

admissions arrangements.”.’.

 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  50

 

Clause  41,  page  30,  line  2,  leave out ‘a prescribed number of’ and insert ‘the two’.


 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 3 May 2006