House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

S.C.E.    Standing Committee Proceedings: 2nd May 2006            

156

 

Education and Inspections Bill, continued

 
 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Not called  51

 

Clause  41,  page  31,  line  2,  leave out ‘prescribed number of’ and insert ‘the two’.

 

Mr Edward Leigh

 

Not selected  197

 

Page  29,  line  21,  leave out Clause 41.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr David Willetts

 

Mr Nick Gibb

 

Mr John Hayes

 

Mr David Evennett

 

Question proposed  92

 

Clause  42,  page  31,  line  26,  at end insert—

 

‘(1A)    

After subsection (2) insert—

 

“(2A)    

Where an objection is made under subsection (2), the person making the

 

objection to the adjudicator (the “objector”) must provide a detailed

 

meritorious case for his decision, setting out why the specific admission

 

arrangement to which he objects damages his school or, in the case of a

 

local education authority, other schools within the authority area, and

 

providing substantive evidence to support his case.

 

(2B)    

If the objector fails to provide the detailed meritorious case and evidence

 

required in subsection (2A) the adjudicator shall not hear the objection.

 

(2C)    

If, in the reasonable opinion of the adjudicator an objection by an

 

objector is unreasonable, vexatious, frivolous or otherwise

 

unmeritorious, he shall not hear the objection.

 

(2D)    

Where an objector has made objection on the same grounds at any time

 

in the previous three years, the adjudicator shall not hear the

 

objection.”.’.

 

[Adjourned till Tuesday 9th May at 10.30 a.m.


 
previous section contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 3 May 2006