|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 41, page 31, line 2, leave out ‘prescribed number of’ and insert ‘the two’. |
|
| |
| | |
| Page 29, line 21, leave out Clause 41. |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
| Clause 42, page 31, line 26, at end insert— |
|
| | ‘(1A) | After subsection (2) insert— |
|
| | “(2A) | Where an objection is made under subsection (2), the person making the |
|
| | objection to the adjudicator (the “objector”) must provide a detailed |
|
| | meritorious case for his decision, setting out why the specific admission |
|
| | arrangement to which he objects damages his school or, in the case of a |
|
| | local education authority, other schools within the authority area, and |
|
| | providing substantive evidence to support his case. |
|
| | (2B) | If the objector fails to provide the detailed meritorious case and evidence |
|
| | required in subsection (2A) the adjudicator shall not hear the objection. |
|
| | (2C) | If, in the reasonable opinion of the adjudicator an objection by an |
|
| | objector is unreasonable, vexatious, frivolous or otherwise |
|
| | unmeritorious, he shall not hear the objection. |
|
| | (2D) | Where an objector has made objection on the same grounds at any time |
|
| | in the previous three years, the adjudicator shall not hear the |
|
| | |
| [Adjourned till Tuesday 9th May at 10.30 a.m. |
|
|