House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

Terrorism Bill


 
 

 

Terrorism Bill

lords reasons for insisting on certain lords amendments and

disagreement to certain commons amendments in lieu

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 38, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

Clause 1

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 5

5

Page 2, line 1, leave out subsection (4) and insert—

 

“( )    

For the purposes of this section, “indirect encouragement” comprises the

 

making of a statement describing terrorism in such a way that the listener

 

would infer that he should emulate it.”

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendmentS in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34, but

 

propose Amendments 34A and 34B in lieu.

 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 28, 31 and 34 and disagree to

 

Amendment 34B proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—

5A

Because it is inappropriate for the definition of indirect encouragement of terrorism to

 

include “glorification”

Clause 2

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 11

11

Page 3, line 23, leave out subsection (4)

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendmentS in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34, but

 

propose Amendments 34A and 34B in lieu.

 
 
Bill 13854/1

 
 

Terrorism Bill

2

 
 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 28, 31 and 34 and disagree to

 

Amendment 34B proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—

11A

Because it is inappropriate for the definition of indirect encouragement of terrorism to

 

include “glorification”

Clause 3

COMMONS amendmentS in lieu

27D

Page 6      , line 25, leave out “capable of being” and insert “likely to be”

27E

Page 6      , line 27, leave out “capable of being” and insert “likely to be”

 

lords disagreement and reason

 

The Lords disagree with Amendments 27D and 27E proposed by the Commons in lieu of

 

certain Lords amendments for the following Reason—

27F

Because disagreement with Commons Amendments 27D and 27E is consequential on the

 

Lords’ insistence on amendment 28

 

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 28

28

Page 6, line 25, leave out subsection (9)

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendmentS in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34, but

 

propose Amendments 34A and 34B in lieu.

 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 28, 31 and 34 and disagree to

 

Amendment 34B proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—

28A

Because it is inappropriate for the definition of indirect encouragement of terrorism to

 

include “glorification”

Clause 20

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 31

31

Page 18, leave out lines 13 and 14

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendmentS in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34, but

 

propose Amendments 34A and 34B in lieu.


 
 

Terrorism Bill

3

 
 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 28, 31 and 34 and disagree to

 

Amendment 34B proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—

31A

Because it is inappropriate for the definition of indirect encouragement of terrorism to

 

include “glorification”

Clause 21

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 34

34

Page 19, leave out lines 29 to 44 and insert “indirectly encourage terrorism, within

 

the meaning of “indirect encouragement” as specified in section 1(3) of the

 

Terrorism Act 2006”

 

COMMONS disAGREEMENT and amendmentS in lieu

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 15, 28, 31, 32 and 34, but

 

propose Amendments 34A and 34B in lieu—

34B

Page 19      , line 39, leave out “of a description” and insert “that is illustrative of a type”

 

lords insistence and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments Nos. 5, 11, 28, 31 and 34 and disagree to

 

Amendment 34B proposed by the Commons in lieu for the following Reason—

34C

Because it is inappropriate for the definition of indirect encouragement of terrorism to

 

include “glorification”


 
 

Terrorism Bill

4


 
contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 2 March 2006