NOTICES OF AMENDMENTS
given up to and including
Tuesday 14th March 2006
CONSIDERATION OF LORDS MESSAGE
TERRORISM BILL
On Consideration of Lords Reasons for insisting on Amendments and disagreeing to Commons Amendments
Lords Reasons Nos. 5A, 11A, 31A and 34C
Mr Secretary Clarke
To move, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendments 5, 11, 31 and 34 and insists on its Amendment 34B but does not insist on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 28 and proposes the following Amendment in lieu:
(a)
Page 6, line 24, at end insert
'(8A) The reference in subsection (8) to something that is likely to be understood as an indirect encouragement to the commission or preparation of acts of terrorism or Convention offences includes anything which is likely to be understood as
(a) | the glorification of the commission or preparation (whether in the past, in the future or generally) of such acts or such offences; and |
(b) | a suggestion that what is being glorified is being glorified as conduct that should be emulated in existing circumstances.'. |
As an Amendment to Mr Secretary Clarke's proposed Motion:
David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Patrick McLoughlin
Line 3, leave out from 'following' to end of line 11 and insert 'Amendments in lieu:
(b)
Page 6, Line 24, at end insert
'(8A) The reference in subsection (8) to something that is capable of being understood as an indirect encouragement to the commission or preparation of acts of terrorism or Convention offences comprises the making of a statement referring to terrorism in such a way that the listener, reader or viewer would infer that he should emulate it.'.
Lords Reason No. 5A
David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Patrick McLoughlin
To move, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 5.
To move the following Amendment to the Bill in lieu of the Lords Amendment:
(a)
Page 2, line 1, leave out subsection (4) and insert
'( ) | for the purposes of this section, "indirect encouragement" comprises the making of a statement referring to terrorism in such a way that the listener, reader or viewer would infer that he should emulate it.'. |
Lords Reason No. 28A
David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Mr Patrick McLoughlin
To move, That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their Amendment 28.
To move the following Amendment to the words so restored to the Bill:
(a)
Page 6, line 27, leave out from 'offences' to end of line 32 and insert 'comprises the making of a statement referring to terrorism in such a way that the listener, reader or viewer would infer that he should emulate it.'.
ORDER OF THE HOUSE [26TH OCTOBER 2005]
That the following provisions shall apply to the Terrorism Bill:
Committal
1. | | The Bill shall be committed to a Committee of the whole House. |
Proceedings in Committee
2. | (1) | Proceedings in Committee of the whole House shall be completed in two days. |
| (2) | Those proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following table and shall be brought to a conclusion (so far as not previously concluded) at the times specified in the second column. |