House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


S.C.D.

259

 
 

House of Commons

 
 

Thursday 22nd June 2006

 

Standing Committee Proceedings

 

Standing Committee D

 

Company Law Reform Bill [Lords]


 

[FOURTH AND FIFTH sittingS]


 

Clause 57.

 

Amendment (No. 118) proposed, in page 22, line 38, after ‘name’, insert ‘and in the

 

absence of the applicant receiving any response by the specified department or other body

 

within 30 days of its receipt of such a request, the specified department or other body shall

 

be deemed to have confirmed that it has no objection to the proposed name’.—(James

 

Brokenshire).

 

Question again proposed, That the Amendment be made.

 

Negatived on division

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  119

 

Clause  57,  page  22,  line  43,  after ‘received’, insert ‘or include a statement that no

 

such response was received within the time period referred to in subsection (2)’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  120

 

Clause  57,  page  23,  line  6,  after ‘received’, insert ‘or must include a statement that

 

no such response was received within the time period referred to in subsection (2)’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 



 
 

S.C.D.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 22nd June 2006            

260

 

Company Law Reform Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  121

 

Clause  58,  page  23,  line  18,  leave out ‘registered’ and insert ‘incorporated’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  122

 

Clause  58,  page  23,  line  18,  leave out ‘by’ and insert ‘with’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  123

 

Clause  58,  page  23,  line  19,  after ‘includes’, insert ‘, or change its name to a name

 

that consists of or includes,’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  57

 

Clause  58,  page  23,  line  21,  at end insert—

 

‘( )    

Regulations under this section shall not require a company to change its name.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 

Clause 59 Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  124

 

Clause  60,  page  23,  line  34,  leave out subsections (1), (2) and (3) and insert—

 

‘(1)    

Subject to section 61, the name of a limited company that is a private company

 

must end with “limited” or “ltd” or, in the case of a Welsh company, its name may

 

instead end with “cyfyngedig” or “cyf.”.’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  125

 

Clause  60,  page  24,  line  1,  leave out from ‘companies’ to end of line 3.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 

Clause 61 Agreed to.

 



 
 

S.C.D.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 22nd June 2006            

261

 

Company Law Reform Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  58

 

Clause  62,  page  25,  line  2,  leave out ‘, or any return of capital,’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  59

 

Clause  63,  page  25,  line  26,  after first ‘its’, insert ‘profits (if any) or other’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  126

 

Clause  64,  page  25,  line  36,  leave out ‘section 62 or 63’ and insert ‘section

 

61(1)(c)’.

 

Margaret Hodge

 

Agreed to  101

 

Clause  64,  page  25,  line  40,  leave out ‘alter’ and insert ‘amend’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  127

 

Clause  65,  page  26,  leave out lines 44 and 45.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  128

 

Clause  66,  page  27,  line  32,  at end insert—


 
 

S.C.D.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 22nd June 2006            

262

 

Company Law Reform Bill[ [], continued

 
 

‘(6)    

Nothing contained in this section shall prevent a company continuing to use its

 

name if such name was registered with the registrar of companies prior to the date

 

of any regulations made under this section.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  129

 

Clause  67,  page  28,  line  16,  at end insert—

 

‘(6)    

Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit or inhibit an objection under

 

section 70.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  130

 

Clause  68,  page  28,  line  22,  leave out from ‘names,’ to end of line 23.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  131

 

Clause  69,  page  28,  line  42,  after ‘be’, insert ‘in writing and’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  132

 

Clause  70,  page  29,  line  18,  after ‘name’, insert ‘or incorporates a name’.


 
 

S.C.D.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 22nd June 2006            

263

 

Company Law Reform Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  133

 

Clause  70,  page  29,  line  19,  after ‘goodwill’, insert ‘in the United Kingdom’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  134

 

Clause  70,  page  29,  line  22,  after ‘applicant’, insert ‘provided that the applicant

 

was using such name in the United Kingdom at that time.’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  135

 

Clause  70,  page  29,  line  23,  at end insert ‘within twelve months of the company’s

 

registration with the relevant name’.

 

Mr Quentin Davies

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  252

 

Clause  70,  page  30,  line  2,  after ‘upheld’, insert —

 

                          ‘(i)’.

 

Mr Quentin Davies

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  253

 

Clause  70,  page  30,  line  5,  at end add ‘or

 

(ii)    

if the activities of the company using the registered name would

 

be likely to deceive members of the public or to cause loss or

 

damage to persons dealing with the company.’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Negatived on division  136

 

Clause  70,  page  30,  line  6,  at end insert—

 

‘(6A)    

Without prejudice to the foregoing provisions of this section, in the event that all

 

of the circumstances contemplated in subsection (8) are satisfied, an applicant

 

may apply to a company names adjudicator for an interim order under this

 

subsection.

 

(6B)    

The circumstances referred to in subsection (7) are that—

 

(a)    

the applicant is a company whose shares are listed on a regulated market;

 

(b)    

the applicant has published a circular to shareholders incorporating a

 

resolution proposing to change its name to a particular name (a “relevant

 

name”); and


 
 

S.C.D.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 22nd June 2006            

264

 

Company Law Reform Bill[ [], continued

 
 

(c)    

a company (the “respondent”) has been incorporated with the relevant

 

name or changed its name to the relevant name in either case on or after

 

the date of publication of the circular referred to in subsection (8)(b).

 

(6C)    

If an application for an interim order is made and the adjudicator is satisfied that

 

the provisions of subsection (8) are satisfied, the adjudicator shall make an order

 

requiring the respondent to change its name to a name specified by the

 

adjudicator.

 

(6D)    

The adjudicator must give notice of his interim order—

 

(a)    

to the applicant;

 

(b)    

to the respondent; and

 

(c)    

to the registrar.

 

(6E)    

Upon the presentation by the applicant to the registrar of an official copy of the

 

interim order together with all other documents contemplated by section 78

 

(Change of name by special resolution), and the registrar is satisfied that—

 

(a)    

the relevant name complies with the requirements of this Part, and

 

(b)    

the requirements of the Companies Acts and any relevant requirement of

 

the applicant’s articles, with respect to a change of name are complied

 

with,

 

    

the registrar must enter the relevant name as the new name of the applicant and

 

enter the name set out in the interim order as the new name of the responent on

 

the register in place of the former names of the applicant and respondent

 

respectively.

 

(6F)    

On the registration of the new names, the registrar must issue a certificate of

 

incorporation to each of the applicant and the respondent altered to meet the

 

circumstances of the case.

 

(6G)    

The making of an interim order shall be without prejudice to any other legal rights

 

of the applicant or respondent or any application by the respondent under

 

subsection (1).’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not selected  259

 

Clause  70,  page  30,  line  7,  at end add ‘and reputation includes that the name in

 

which the reputation is claimed is a registered trademark in current use’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  137

 

Clause  70,  page  30,  line  7,  after ‘section’, insert ‘and in section 73’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  60

 

Clause  70,  page  30,  line  7,  at end insert—

 

‘(8)    

In this section “start-up costs” shall be considered “substantial” in relation to the

 

annual revenue and assets of the company.’.


 
 

S.C.D.  Standing Committee Proceedings: 22nd June 2006            

265

 

Company Law Reform Bill[ [], continued

 
 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Withdrawn  61

 

Clause  72,  page  30,  line  33,  leave out ‘may’ and insert ‘shall’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  62

 

Clause  72,  page  31,  line  13,  at end insert—

 

‘(l)    

requiring the publication of all decisions by the adjudicator within 90

 

days of the decision being given.’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 


 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  264

 

Clause  73,  page  31,  line  20,  leave out subsection (1) and insert—

 

‘(1)    

If an application under section 70 is upheld, the adjudicator shall make an order,

 

either—

 

(a)    

requiring the respondent company to change its name to one that is not

 

an offending name, and requiring all respondents—

 

(i)    

to take all such steps as are within their powers to make, or

 

facilitate the making of that change, and

 

(ii)    

not to cause or permit any steps to be taken calculated to result in

 

another company being registered with a name that is an

 

offending name, or

 

(b)    

requiring the respondent company to undertake to the applicant and to the

 

Secretary of State not to operate under the registered name in connection

 

with such activities as may be specified in the order.’.

 

Mr Jonathan Djanogly

 

Mr Crispin Blunt

 

James Brokenshire

 

Not called  138

 

Clause  73,  page  31,  line  20,  after ‘application’, insert ‘other than an application for

 

an interim order’.

 

Clause Agreed to.

 



 
contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 23 June 2006