House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2005 - 06
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament

06204.1-4


 
 

 

Civil Aviation Bill

lords REASON FOR insistING, non-insistence and reason FOR

DISAGREEING TO COMMONS AMENDMENT IN LIEU

[The page and line references are to HL Bill 21, the bill as first printed for the Lords.]

Clause 1

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 1

1

Page 1, line 7, leave out “may” and insert “shall”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

1A

Because it is not appropriate to require aerodrome authorities to fix their charges in the

 

manner proposed

 

LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 1, 2 and 4 for the following Reason—

1B

Because it is appropriate to require aerodrome authorities to fix their charges in the manner

 

proposed

 

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 2

2

Page 1, line 8, leave out from “in” to “by” and insert “proportion to the noise made

 

by aircraft and”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

2A

Because it is not appropriate to require aerodrome authorities to fix their charges in the

 

manner proposed

 

LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 1, 2 and 4 for the following Reason—

 
 
Bill 20454/1

 
 

Civil Aviation Bill

2

2B

Because it is appropriate to require aerodrome authorities to fix their charges in the manner

 

proposed

 

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 4

4

Page 2, line 31, at end insert—

 

“( )    

Charges, in relation to noise, shall be proportional to the noise

 

emitted.”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON

 

The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following Reason—

4A

Because it is not appropriate to require aerodrome authorities to fix their charges in the

 

manner proposed

 

LORDS INSISTENCE AND REASON

 

The Lords insist on their Amendments 1, 2 and 4 for the following Reason—

4B

Because it is appropriate to require aerodrome authorities to fix their charges in the manner

 

proposed

Clause 2

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 5

5

Page 2, line 41, leave out subsection (2)

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5 and 11, but propose Amendment 11A

 

in lieu.

 

lords insistence, non-insistence, disagreement and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendment 5, do not insist on their Amendment 11 and do

 

disagree with the Commons in their Amendment 11A in lieu for the following Reason—

5B

Because it is desirable to maintain the current system of regulating night flights

Clause 13

LORDS AMENDMENT NO. 11

11

Page 12, line 25, at end insert—

 

“( )    

But an order under subsection (2) may not provide for subsections (2) and

 

(3) of section 2 to come into force before 1st June 2012.”

 

COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT IN LIEU

 

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 5 and 11, but propose Amendment 11A


 
 

Civil Aviation Bill

3

 
 

in lieu—

11A

Page 12, line 25, at end insert—

 

“(3A)    

But an order under subsection (2) may not provide for subsections (2) to (4)

 

of section 2 to come into force before 1st June 2012.”

 

lords insistence, non-insistence, disagreement and reason

 

The Lords insist on their Amendment 5, do not insist on their Amendment 11 and do

 

disagree with the Commons in their Amendment 11A in lieu for the following Reason—

11B

Because it is desirable to maintain the current system of regulating night flights


 
 

Civil Aviation Bill

4


 
contents
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Revised 30 June 2006