|
| |
| | |
| |
|
lords amendment and disagreements |
|
[The page and line references are to Bill 137, as first printed for the Commons] |
|
|
|
|
4 | Page 4, line 13, leave out from “scheme” to end of line 15 |
|
| | LORDS AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT |
|
| | The Lords agree to Commons Amendment 4 and propose Amendment 4A to it— |
|
4A | Line 1, at end insert “and insert “in accordance with natural justice such that the |
|
| | person overseeing the investigation is independent of the body or person under |
|
| | investigation (such investigation to be confined to the facts of cases and not to |
|
| | consider issues of liability in law, whether civil or criminal);”” |
|
| | |
5 | Page 4, line 17, leave out paragraph (c) |
|
| | lords disagreement and reason |
|
| | The Lords disagree to Commons Amendment 5 for the following Reason— |
|
5A | Because it is appropriate to ensure the separation between fact-finding and assessment of |
|
| | liability under the scheme |
|
|
|
16 | Page 6, line 26, leave out from “scheme” to end of line 27 |
|
| | LORDs disagreement and reason |
|
| | The Lords disagree to Commons Amendment 16 for the following Reason— |
|
16A | Because it is appropriate to ensure the separation between fact-finding and assessment of |
|
| |
| | |
