Previous Section Index Home Page

9 Jun 2005 : Column 658W—continued

Immigration Appeals Tribunal

Harry Cohen: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what account he takes of determinations by the Immigration Appeals Tribunal that a case has no merit when he is required to reconsider that case on grounds wider than those on which the Tribunal has considered it. [2070]

Mr. McNulty: Cases are reconsidered on the basis of all the available evidence. This will include determinations by the Immigration Appeals Tribunal if they are relevant to the new evidence.

Migrant Workers

Mr. Fraser: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on his plans to prevent the abuse and exploitation of migrant workers in the UK. [1374]

Mr. McNulty: The Government take very seriously the abuse and exploitation of migrant workers. Our strategy for dealing with this problem includes tackling human trafficking as a priority for our presidency of the European Union, strengthening the legislative framework, improving the security of administrative processes governing the entry of migrant workers, increasing enforcement action, and developing closer working between departments responsible for enforcing workplace regulations. We have introduced a new criminal offence of trafficking for the purpose of exploitation, including forced labour, punishable on conviction by a maximum of 14 years' imprisonment. We supported the legislation establishing the Gangmaster Licensing Authority, which will tackle illegal employment practices in the agricultural labour provision sector through statutory licensing. We will also introduce on the spot penalties for employers found to be using illegal migrant workers.

The current work permit arrangements include checks to ensure work permit applicants are protected from potentially exploitative employment arrangements, and investigations are carried out where there is intelligence of abuse. We are also improving joint working across departmental boundaries. The Home Office is a key participant in Reflex, the multi-agency initiative created to tackle organised immigration crime, including people smuggling and human trafficking. We will also pilot a joint team in the West Midlands to examine the scope for closer co-operation between workplace enforcement agencies in relation to the use and exploitation of illegal migrant workers.

Online Identity Verification

Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the user organisations for online identity inquiries with which his Department is having discussions; and if he will list (a) other potential users and (b) the locations where he envisages online inquiry facilities (i) with and (ii) without the ability to check a person's biometric data which will be available (A) for Government use and (B) for use by other organisations. [1786]


 
9 Jun 2005 : Column 659W
 

Mr. McNulty: Identity cards will provide a convenient and secure way for individuals to prove their identity and, with their consent, for identity verification checks to be made by a range of potential public and private sector users. The Identity Cards Programme Team have had discussions with a number of public sector organisations including: Cabinet Office, Department for Constitutional Affairs, Department for Education and Skills, Department of Transport, Department of Health, DVLA, Department for Work and Pensions, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, Her Majesty's Treasury, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Criminal Records Bureau, Local Government Association, Northern Ireland Office, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Office for National Statistics, E-Government Unit, Association of Chief Police Officers, Scottish Executive, National Assembly for Wales and United Kingdom Passport Service. The Identity Cards Programme Team has also briefed representatives from the private sector including the banking, utilities, aviation and retail sectors.

In all cases, verification checks of cards will not give access to the contents of the database or the details of the biometric. They will simply confirm identity and other relevant details, for example to confirm whether a foreign national is free to take employment.

It is too early for any detailed discussions on the locations at which identity checks will be carried out and where they will involve biometric checks.

Queen's Award for Voluntary Service

Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many groups (a) were nominated for and (b) received The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service; and how many represented ethnic minority groups in each case. [1991]

Paul Goggins: 617 groups were nominated for The Queen's Award for Voluntary Service 2005, of which 580 were eligible. 92 groups received The Queen's Award. 44 of the eligible nominations represented ethnic minority groups and 11 of those received The Queen's Award.

Security Industry Authority

Anne Snelgrove: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people with serious criminal records have been granted a licence by the Security Industry Authority once the five-year period has elapsed after the date of their last offence. [1603]

Paul Goggins: This information is not held centrally.

Traffic Wardens

Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many traffic wardens there are in the East Midlands region. [2014]

Paul Goggins: The latest available information on the number of traffic wardens employed by police authorities in the East Midlands is in the following table. The table does not include parking attendants employed by local authorities to enforce non-criminal parking infringements.
 
9 Jun 2005 : Column 660W
 

Number of traffic wardens in the East Midlands as at 31 December 2004


Force
Total strength (Q)(full-time equivalent)Total strength (Q(head count)
Derbyshire42.0443
Leicestershire33.9535
Lincolnshire21.2522
Northamptonshire2.784
Nottinghamshire34.7937
Total134.81141

FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS

EU Legislation

Kate Hoey: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will make a statement on the procedure by which Parliament will assess whether EU legislation complies with the subsidiarity principle. [1653]

Mr. Douglas Alexander: The Government believe that it is for the two Houses to decide what parliamentary procedures would be most effective to implement the subsidiarity early warning mechanism as envisaged in the new constitutional treaty. The Government are aware that the House of Lords European Union Committee has produced a report on the subsidiarity early warning mechanism, for which the Foreign Secretary provided a memorandum on 3 November 2004, and the Select Committee on the Modernisation of the House of Commons and the European Scrutiny Committee have also considered this issue. The Government hope that cooperation between the two Houses on working out an effective procedure for the subsidiarity mechanism, in consultation with the devolved legislatures as appropriate, will continue.

EU Presidency

Kate Hoey: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (1) what the budget allocation for the presidency unit is for 2005–06, broken down by (a) activity and (b) budget line; [1807]

(2) what the estimated spending on official meetings from the budget for UK presidency of the EU is, including the Gymnich and European Councils. [1810]

Mr. Douglas Alexander: The initial budget allocation for the presidency unit in 2005–06 is £8.44 million. This breaks down as follows:
Official meetings (including the Gymnich at £1.1 million and two European Councils totalling £2 million)£5.08 million
Administration (including human resources and training)£2.726 million
Official presidency website (including translation costs)£200,000
Public information and communication£250,000
Capital costs (including capital charges)£182,000

There is likely to be some variation in final spending patterns and exact individual costs.

Kate Hoey: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the estimated spending on the UK presidency of the EU is, broken down by activity; and how much has been spent to date. [1809]


 
9 Jun 2005 : Column 661W
 

Mr. Douglas Alexander: Expected spending over the 18-month planning period and the six-month operational period of the presidency currently breaks down as follows:
Official meetings (including the Gymnich and European Councils)£5.91 million
Administration (including human resources and training)£3.85 million
Official presidency website£388,000
Public information and communication£350,000
Total provisional budget£10.56 million

Spend to the end of March 2004–05 is currently costed at £1.97 million. Year-end accounts are currently being finalised and this figure is subject to change.

Mr. Brady: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs if he will list the Government's priorities for the UK presidency of the EU. [1897]

Mr. Douglas Alexander [holding answer 6 June 2005]: Europe is facing a series of challenges: emerging competition in global markets; new threats to our security; climate change and inequality between rich and poor. The Government's priorities for the UK presidency will focus on:

I also refer the hon. Member to the statement my right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary made to the House on 6 June on the EU constitutional treaty, Official Report, columns 991–92.


Next Section Index Home Page