|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the cost was of (a) investigating the suitability of and (b) the planning process, including the cost of any public inquiries or
23 Jun 2005 : Column 1153W
litigation when relevant, in respect of each site that Government consider for accommodation centres for asylum seekers. 
Paul Goggins: The total number of current, and planned, automatic number plate recognition (ANPR) readers is not collated by the Home Office and is a matter for individual police forces and their partners.
Sarah Teather: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people were charged with possession of (a) class A, (b) class B and (c) class C drugs in each London borough in each of the last five years. 
Kate Hoey: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what communication activities are planned in relation to the policy areas covered by his Department during the UK presidency of the EU; and what budget has been allocated for these activities. 
Andy Burnham: External communications activity for the UK presidency of the EU is being coordinated centrally by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. Within the Home Office external communications activity has been provided for by existing budgets for EU work and no additional budget agreed. External communications work for the presidency will include media handling around JHA councils, the JHA informal, smaller Home Office presidency seminars and events on themes such as resettlement, new detection technology, e-borders and the safe use of the internet, and joint seminars with other agencies. The Home Office and the Department for Constitutional Affairs will join together to make a short video outlining justice and home affairs presidency priorities.
Sarah Teather: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many referrals of (a) immigration, (b) asylum and (c) naturalisation cases to the immigration and nationality directorate by hon. Members there have been in each year since 2001, broken down by constituency. 
During the period 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2004 the immigration and nationality directorate (IND) received 109,331 letters from Members of Parliament about case-related asylum, immigration and nationality matters. These included both letters sent for ministerial reply and those to which
23 Jun 2005 : Column 1154W
replies were sent by officials. The breakdown by constituency is given in a table which has been placed in the Library.
Mr. Lidington: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the letter of 28 April to the hon. Member for Aylesbury from NCC5 of the managed migration directorate, whether case S1081532 has now been allocated to a caseworker; and when he expects the applicant to be notified of the decision. 
Mr. McNulty: This case is under consideration in the immigration and nationality directorate (IND). The circumstances of the case are not straightforward and it is likely to be some weeks before a decision can be made.
Alison Seabeck: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many incidences of "micro" or "pocket" bikes being ridden illegally on-road there have been in each year since 2002; and how many of those incidences related to underage riders; 
Paul Goggins: It is not possible to identify those offences relating to the use of "pocket" or "micro" bikes from the data collected on the Home Office court proceedings database or by recorded crime.
Mr. Laurence Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on the progress of the application by Olufemi Ojemuyiwa, reference A1194808, for indefinite leave to stay in the United Kingdom. 
Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what progress has been made towards the public service agreement target of increasing voluntary and community activity, including increased community participation, by 5 per cent. by 2006. 
Voluntary and community sector organisations have a crucial role to play in the reinvigoration of civic life and it is important that people are given more opportunities and support to become
23 Jun 2005 : Column 1155W
actively involved in their communities. Performance against the Home Department's targets is published in the annual report and the autumn performance report available at the House Library and on the Home Office website (www.homeoffice.gov.uk). The Home Office annual report for 200405 with the latest performance information was published on 20 June 2005.
Mrs. Iris Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what funding has been provided for addiction (a) treatment and (b) rehabilitation in the Province in each of the last 10 years. 
In relation to rehabilitation, this is an integral part of all drug and alcohol treatment whether community or inpatient based. The cost of this generic rehabilitation cannot be disaggregated from the total costs of such programmes. The majority of drug rehabilitation can and does take place in the community as part of an overall community care and rehabilitation programme and provision exists within each board area to refer individuals to residential rehabilitation centres outside Northern Ireland if deemed to be clinically appropriate.
Lady Hermon: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland if he will provide additional funding to the South Eastern Education and Library Board to enable it to reverse its recent announcement of cuts to school crossing patrol services within its catchment area. 
Angela E. Smith: Further to my answer about the change in funding for Education and Library Board services for 200506 of 20 June 2005, Official Report, column 848W, I can also advise that boards have significant flexibility in deciding how to use resources allocated to them and, therefore, the decision to reduce the number of crossing patrols in the South Eastern Board is an operational matter for the Board.
I am assured by the Board that school crossing patrols have only been removed in a small number of areas, and that, in all cases, the Board is satisfied that removal of the service does not jeopardise the safety of children.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|