|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Jacqui Smith: There have been 240 special school closures in England within the period January 1997 to January 2005, with some 121 schools opening in the same period (nine of which subsequently closed and are counted above) giving a net reduction in special schools of 119 in the period. This compares to 234 closures between 198697.
To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what the spending per pupil was in
28 Jun 2005 : Column 1446W
(a) primary, (b) secondary and (c) special schools in (i)1985 and (ii) in the last year for which figures are available. 
[holding answer 27 June 2005]: Everton in Liverpool has benefited from both the trailblazer Sure Start West Everton and Breckfield local programme approved in 1999 and the Everton Early Childhood Centre (EEC) approved in February 2001
28 Jun 2005 : Column 1447W
which are based on the same site. The building was developed with local and national Government funding including both the Sure Start and Early Excellence programmes. The Sure Start local programme and the EEC were brought together and designated as one of the first integrated children's centres in June 2003.
|Sure Start Local Programme Revenue||787,623|
|Early Excellence Centre Revenue||75,647|
|Total Revenue Funding 2005/06||863,270|
From 2006/07 funding will begin to taper for the trailblazer" local programmes as part of the planned process of incorporation in to mainstream services. Everton's Sure Start local programme funding for 2006/07 will be £590,717. Early Excellence Centres have been funded until March 2006. However, Liverpool local authority will receive children's centre funding of £2,955,804 for 200406 and £9,025,886 for 200608. This is to support existing children's centres like Everton as well as to develop more. We expect Early Years provision to be maintained and to grow through children's centres, so that by 2010 there is a children's centre for every community. The Sure Start budget will more than double to £1.8 million by 2008. Exactly how and when this funding is used to support children's centres is a matter for the local authority to decide based on their assessment of existing provision, levels of deprivation and families needs.
Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how much was raised from higher education tuition fees in each education authority in England in (a) 200203, (b) 200304 and (c) 200405; from how many students the sums were raised in each case; and what the average payment was in each year. 
Paul Goggins: Under section 1(1) of the Child Abduction Act 1984, it is an offence for a person connected with a child under the age of 16 (for example a parent or guardian) to take or send the child out of the UK without the appropriate consent.
The Act also criminalises abduction by other persons. Under section 2(1) of the 1984 Act, a person commits an offence if, without lawful authority or reasonable excuse, he takes or detains a child under 16 so as to: (a) remove him from the lawful control of any person
28 Jun 2005 : Column 1448W
having lawful control of the child; or (b) keep him out of the lawful control of any person entitled to lawful control of the child.
Ultimately, it is for the police to decide whether to prefer any charges and the Crown Prosecution Service to determine whether to proceed with a prosecution. Only the courts can decide if an offence has been committed.
The maximum penalty, on summary conviction, for an offence of abduction is six months' imprisonment or a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both. The maximum penalty, on conviction on indictment, is seven years' imprisonment.
Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether he plans to implement the recommendations made by Lord Carlile of Berriew QC in his review of the operation of anti-terror laws. 
Mr. Charles Clarke: I will shortly be placing copies in the House Library of the Government response to Lord Carlile. This will outline progress made on the recommendations made in his report on the operation in 2004 of the Terrorism Act 2000.
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what information he has collated on which other countries are (a) planning and (b) using biometric information on (i) passports and (ii)identification cards. 
Andy Burnham: All the Schengen states will be required to use biometrics in passports under Council Regulation 2252/2004. These biometric are facial images and finger prints, which will be introduced by 18 months and three years respectively for the date of adoption. Non-Schengen states may choose to follow the requirements, though they would not be bound by the timetable. Similar information has not been collated for Non-EU states. All ED member states which issue identity cards are considering introducing biometrics to increase security. This is part of a world-wide move towards using biometrics in travel and other identity documents, not an EU requirement as there is no legal basis for the Community to act on identity cards. Our information on current procedures is that biometric information is only currently stored on the Italian national identity card. Among non-EU states, Hong Kong currently includes biometric information on its national identity cards and Thailand is planning their introduction.
The UK Passport Service plans to commence the introduction of biometric passports in February 2006 and to be producing the new passport for all its customers by end of July 2006. The new passport
28 Jun 2005 : Column 1449W
will comply in all respects to the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) standards for biometric passports.
Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what his estimate is of the cost of producing biometric passports (a) to comply with US requirements and (b) with a facial recognition biometric obtained in the most cost-effective manner. 
Andy Burnham: The UK Passport Service has not finally completed commercial negotiations with its security printers Security Printing and Systems Ltd on the production of the biometric passport, so is not in a position to provide the cost estimate requested.
Mr. McNulty: We have taken a number of steps to assess the accuracy of biometric readings. We have closely reviewed leading scientific evidence in the field; consulted with biometric experts from academia and industry; sought to build on the experience and knowledge of other organisations, such as IND, PITO and Communications-Electronic Security Group's (CESG's) biometric readings group and we have conducted a review of the experiences of other examples of biometric systems, including systems holding millions of sample records. Current thinking is that three separate biometrics will be recorded (iris image; fingerprints and facial recognition) which would increase the accuracy of biometric readings from individuals. In addition, we will keep emerging research in this field under constant review and it is envisaged we will hold performance tests during procurement and the early phase of implementation of the ID card scheme.
The Home Office and UKPS (UK Passport Service) have examined the use of facial recognition as part of the biometric enrolment trial. This was not a technology evaluation but supported the view that facial recognition has applications in 1-to-1 matching but is not suitable for matching against very large numbers of records. Facial recognition is still being considered as one of the biometric technologies which may be used for Identity Cards. Police Information Technology Organisation (PITO) has an active biometrics programme and maintains awareness of many biometric and human identification technologies, including facial recognition. PITO is engaged in producing a facial images database for identification purposes as part of the Facial Images National Database (FIND) project which should complete in 2006. UKPS is currently assessing the suitability of automatic face recognition technology for use within the passport application process for detecting fraudulent applications. A standalone Automatic Face Recognition (AFR) system is being deployed in the UKPS's seven fraud and intelligence units to help prove the concept and to establish the benefits of using AFR, and assist in the development of technical and
28 Jun 2005 : Column 1450W
operational specifications for full system integration. The UKPS plan to complete their assessment by the end of 2005.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|