Previous Section Index Home Page

6 Jul 2005 : Column 506W—continued

Asylum Seekers

Alistair Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions in the last six months escorted detainees from Yarl's Wood Detention Centre have refused to board aircraft in pursuance of a deportation order and been returned to Yarl's Wood; and if he will make a statement. [8506]

Mr. McNulty holding answer 29 June 2005]: From December 2004—May 2005, 114 escorted detainees from Yarl's Wood have refused to board an aircraft in pursuance of a deportation or following refusal of leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom and been returned to Yarl's Wood.

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many asylum seekers have been accepted into the UK since 1997; and how many of these were (a) Nigerian, (b) Algerian, (c) Iraqi, (d) Chinese, (e) Bangladeshi, (f) Pakistani, (g) Turkish, (h) Albanian, (i) Bosnian, (j) Mexican, (k) Sudanese, (l) Zimbabwean and (m) Palestinian. [8535]

Mr. McNulty: The requested information on when asylum seekers arrive in the UK is not available. Data on applications by asylum seekers, by nationality, are based on the date when an application is made. Data on applications, and on initial decision outcomes and appeal outcomes are published in the annual bulletin Asylum Statistics United Kingdom 2003, and (data for 2004) Asylum Statistics: 4th Quarter 2004 United Kingdom. Copies are available in the Library of the House and on the Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate website at http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/immigration1.html.

The tables show application, initial decision and appeal outcome data, where available, for Bosnia-Herzegovina, Mexico and Palestine that are currently not available on the website.
Asylum applications received in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants, and initial decisions(30)on applications, 1997–2004(31), nationals of Bosnia-Herzegovina
Principal applicants

Applications
Decisions
TotalPortIn countryTotal decisionsGrants of asylumGrants of ELRGrants of HP(32)Grants of DL(32)
199717025145385235120n/an/a
199816055110954520n/an/a
19991755012565305n/an/a
200010525803104525n/an/a
20015015351901020n/an/a
2002505457555n/an/a
20033553065***
2004(33)15*1525n/a*

Decisions
Total refusalsCertified refusalsOther refusalsThird city refusals(34)Non-compliance refusals(35)Grants of ELR under backlog criteria(36)(5507990037)Non compliance refusals under backlog criteria(36)(5507990037)
199725010105(30) 0(30) 0
1998305205*(30) 0(30) 0
1999555*1510
2000185(30) 0110*703520
2001160257065(30) 0(30) 0
200265103025(30) 0(30) 0
200360*3520(30) 0(30) 0
2004(33)20*155(30) 0(30) 0




n/a = not applicable
(30)Information is of initial determination decisions, excluding the outcome of appeals or other subsequent decisions.
(31)Figures rounded to nearest 5, with *' = 1 or 2.
(32)Humanitarian protection and discretionary leave replaced exceptional leave to remain from 1 April 2003.
(33)Provisional figures
(34)Refused on the grounds that the applicant had arrived from a safe third country.
(35)Paragraph 340 of Immigration Rules. For failure to provide evidence to support the asylum claim within a reasonable period, including failure to respond to invitation to interview.
(36)Cases decided under pragmatic measures aimed at reducing the pre 1996 asylum backlog.
(37)May include a small number of cases where asylum has been granted.
(38)May include a small number of cases where the application has been refused on substantive grounds.
(39) 0 Not available.



 
6 Jul 2005 : Column 507W
 

Outcome of appeals(40)determined by adjudicators of the Immigration Appellate Authority, excluding dependants, nationals of Bosnia-Herzegovina,1997–2004
Number of principal appellants

Appeals determined by adjudicators(41)
Allowed
Dismissed
Withdrawn
TotalTotalAs percentage
of determined
TotalAs percentage
of determined
TotalAs percentage
of determined
1997n/an/an/an/a
1998n/an/an/an/a
1999n/an/an/an/a
2000n/an/an/an/a
20016515254065510
200265253435511015
200365152240641014
2004(42)401027256656




n/a = not available.
(40)Figures rounded to nearest 5 (except percentages), with *' = 1 or 2.
Data on appeal outcomes by nationality in this table are derived from electronic sources.
(41)Figures include cases withdrawn by the Home Office, as well as the appellant.
(42)Provisional figures.



Asylum applications received in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants, and initial decisions(43)on applications, 1997–2004(44),nationals of Mexico
Principal applicants

Applications
Decisions
TotalPortIn countryTotal decisionsGrants of asylumGrants of ELRGrants of HP(45)Grants of DL(45)
199755n/an/a
1998***n/an/a
1999n/an/a
2000**5*n/an/a
200155*n/an/a
200255*n/an/a
2003**5
2004(46)**n/a

Decisions
Total refusalsCertified refusalsOther refusalsThird city refusals(47)Non-compliance refusals(48)Grants of ELR under backlog criteria(49)(5507990050)Non compliance refusals under backlog criteria(49)(5507990050)
1997(43) 0(43) 0
1998**(43) 0(43) 0
1999
2000*(43) 0**
2001**(43) 0(43) 0
2002***(43) 0(43) 0
20035**(43) 0(43) 0
2004(46)(43) 0(43) 0




n/a = not applicable
(43)Information is of initial determination decisions, excluding the outcome of appeals or other subsequent decisions.
(44)Figures rounded to nearest 5, with *' = 1 or 2.
(45)Humanitarian protection and discretionary leave replaced exceptional leave to remain from 1 April 2003.
(46)Provisional figures
(47)Refused on the grounds that the applicant had arrived from a safe third country.
(48)Paragraph 340 of Immigration Rules. For failure to provide evidence to support the asylum claim within a reasonable period, including failure to respond to invitation to interview.
(49)Cases decided under pragmatic measures aimed at reducing the pre 1996 asylum backlog.
(50)May include a small number of cases where asylum has been granted.
(51)May include a small number of cases where the application has been refused on substantive grounds.
(52) 0 Not available.



 
6 Jul 2005 : Column 509W
 

Outcome of appeals(53)determined by adjudicators of the Immigration Appellate Authority, excluding dependants, nationals of Mexico, 1997–2004
Number of principal appellants

Appeals determined by adjudicators(54)
Allowed
Dismissed
Withdrawn
TotalTotalAs percentage
of determined
TotalAs percentage
of determined
TotalAs percentage
of determined
1997n/an/an/an/a
1998n/an/an/an/a
1999n/an/an/an/a
2000n/an/an/an/a
200101000
2002*0*1000
20035051000
2004(55)*0*1000




n/a = not available.
(53)Figures rounded to nearest 5 (except percentages), with *' = 1 or 2.
Data on appeal outcomes by nationality in this table are derived from electronic sources.
(54)Figures include cases withdrawn by the Home Office, as well as the appellant.
(55)Provisional figures.



Asylum applications received in the United Kingdom, excluding dependants, and initial decisions(56)on applications, 1997–2004(57), Palestine
Principal applicants

Applications
Decisions
TotalPortIn countryTotal decisionsGrants of asylumGrants of ELRGrants of HP(58)Grants of DL(58)
199711010010451515n/an/a
199810565352010n/an/a
199928017510540155n/an/a
20003501951553001515n/an/a
200137515521570**n/an/a
20023651052552401010n/an/a
2003345952501,2401010*20
2004(59)4655541555010n/a20

Decisions
Total refusalsCertified refusalsOther refusalsThird city refusals(60)Non-compliance refusals(61)Grants of ELR under backlog criteria(62)(5507990063)Non compliance refusals under backlog criteria(62)(5507990063)
199715*105(56) 0(56) 0
19981055(56) 0(56) 0
199915*510*5
2000240(56) 0150108530*
2001701030525(56) 0(56) 0
2002225*170550(56) 0(56) 0
20031,20051,0355155(56) 0(56) 0
2004(59)5204103080(56) 0(56) 0




n/a = not applicable
(56)Information is of initial determination decisions, excluding the outcome of appeals or other subsequent decisions.
(57)Figures rounded to nearest 5, with *' = 1 or 2.
(58)Humanitarian protection and discretionary leave replaced exceptional leave to remain from 1 April 2003.
(59)Provisional figures
(60)Refused on the grounds that the applicant had arrived from a safe third country.
(61)Paragraph 340 of Immigration Rules. For failure to provide evidence to support the asylum claim within a reasonable period, including failure to respond to invitation to interview.
(62)Cases decided under pragmatic measures aimed at reducing the pre 1996 asylum backlog.
(63)May include a small number of cases where asylum has been granted.
(64)May include a small number of cases where the application has been refused on substantive grounds.
(65) 0 Not available.



Outcome of appeals(66)determined by adjudicators of the Immigration Appellate Authority, excluding dependants, Palestine, 1997–2004
Number of principal appellants

Appeals determined by adjudicators(67)
Allowed
Dismissed
Withdrawn
TotalTotalAs percentage
of determined
TotalAs percentage
of determined
TotalAs percentage of determined
1997n/an/an/an/a
1998n/an/an/an/a
1999n/an/an/an/a
2000n/an/an/an/a
2001652031406157
20025015333064*2
20037351552154574355
2004(68)1,0101801880579303




n/a = not available.
(66)Figures rounded to nearest 5 (except percentages), with *' = 1 or 2.
Data on appeal outcomes by nationality in this table are derived from electronic sources.
(67)Figures include cases withdrawn by the Home Office, as well as the appellant.
(68)Provisional figures.



 
6 Jul 2005 : Column 511W
 

Mrs. James: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on UK immigration policy on Kurdish asylum seekers and refugees from Turkey. [9595]

Mr. McNulty: Asylum and human rights claims by Kurdish asylum seekers from Turkey are, like those of all claimants, from all countries, considered on their individual merits in accordance with our obligations under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). If the claimant meets the definition of a refugee in the 1951 Refugee Convention, they are granted asylum. If they do not qualify for asylum, but there are other circumstances that make them particularly vulnerable and engage our obligations under the ECHR, they are granted humanitarian protection or discretionary leave. If an application is refused, and any appeal is unsuccessful, then we expect the individual concerned to leave the UK voluntarily. If they do not, we consider that it is entirely reasonable for us to enforce the return of that individual


Next Section Index Home Page