Previous Section Index Home Page

7 Jul 2005 : Column 579W—continued

General Practitioner Cover

Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much was allocated by her Department in each primary care trust in England for out-of-hours general practitioner services in (a) 2003–04, (b) 2004–05 and (c) 2005–06; and if she will make a statement. [6231]

Mr. Byrne: Information showing the amount of money allocated by the Department to each primary care trust in England for out-of-hours general practitioner services in 2003–04, 2004–05 and 2005–06 has been placed in the Library.

Healthcare-associated Infections

Mr. Hendrick: To ask the Secretary of State for Health when she will introduce legislation to combat healthcare-associated infection; and if she will make a statement. [10922]

Jane Kennedy: I will be publishing tomorrow a consultation document that sets out detailed proposals for tackling health care associated infections, as outlined in the Gracious Speech. Copies will be available in the Library, and on the Department's website at: www.dh.gov.uk/Consultations/LiveConsultations/fs/en.

Hospital Admissions (Accidents)

Mr. Lansley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the rate of hospital admission for serious accidental injury has been per 100,000 population in each year since 1995. [9515]

Caroline Flint: The available trend data for rate of hospital admission for serious accidental injury are shown in the table.
Age standardized hospital admission rate for serious accidental injury per 100,000 population

Financial yearNumber of persons, all ages, England
1995–96315.9
1996–97319.3
1997–98314.3
1998–99319.1
1999–2000324.9
2000–01313.4
2001–02312.7
2002–03327.8




Notes:
1. Serious accidental injury is defined as an accidental injury resulting in a hospital in-patient stay exceeding three days. The data are estimates derived from information held in the hospital episode statistics system, which contains details of patients admitted to and treated in national health service hospitals in England.
2. Rates are directly age-standardised rates per 100,000 population, standardised against the European standard population.




Influenza Pandemic

Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what plans the Government has for emergency assistance to the national infrastructure in the event of an influenza pandemic; [8892]
 
7 Jul 2005 : Column 580W
 

(2) whether the Health Protection Agency has carried out an assessment of the economic impact of an influenza pandemic; [8894]

(3) what plans the Health Protection Agency has for mortuary facilities in the event of an influenza pandemic; and whether the plans have been rehearsed. [8898]

Caroline Flint: The Department, as lead Department, is working with the Civil Contingencies Secretariat (CCS) and with other Departments on cross-Government preparations for an influenza pandemic. One of the issues being covered in this work is the possible economic impact of a influenza pandemic on the United Kingdom as a whole, taking into account the uncertainty about the nature and scale of a pandemic and its impact. This work is being informed by the Health Protection Agency (HPA) which supports the Department through the provision of expert advice and some operational capacity.

Good business continuity planning will reduce the impact of an influenza pandemic and Government Departments are working closely with key national industries to ensure they are as prepared as possible. The Home Office is assessing whether existing public and national health service mortuaries can cope with excess deaths during an influenza pandemic—in order to identify what extraordinary arrangements might be required to enhance current arrangements, including the provision of additional temporary facilities for the storage of bodies ahead of funerals taking place.

Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what plans the Health Protection Agency has for the provision of hospital beds in the event of an influenza pandemic. [8901]

Caroline Flint: The provision of hospital beds in the event of an influenza pandemic is the responsibility of local national health service trusts, and is not a matter for the Health Protection Agency. The NHS is experienced in managing demand for hospitals beds, and local trusts will have plans in place to deal with increased demand.

In order to assist the NHS in planning for an influenza pandemic, the Department has published the United Kingdom influenza pandemic contingency plan and also the operational guidance for NHS planners. Both these documents make clear that NHS organisations will need to prepare for significant demand for services, and the UK plan gives guidance on the level of demand that the NHS might expect.

London SHAs (Staff)

Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people are directly employed as (a) medical and dental staff and (b) non-medical staff in each London strategic health authority. [8016]

Jane Kennedy: The information requested is shown in the table.
 
7 Jul 2005 : Column 581W
 

National health service hospital and community health services: total non-medical staff employed by specified organisations by main staff group as at 30 September 2004
Headcount

London SHAs
North CentralNorth EastNorth WestSouth EastSouth West
All staff161191131148106
Medical and dental staff811564
All non-medical staff153180126142102
of which:
Qualified nursing, midwifery and health visiting511020
Central functions4412545579
Managers and senior managers10444818393




Source:
Health and Social Care Information Centre Non-Medical Workforce Census 2004
Health and Social Care Information Centre Medical and Dental Workforce Census 2004




Lung Disease

John Cummings: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people in the Easington primary care trust area suffer from (a) chronic bronchitis and emphysema and (b) pneumoconiosis. [8938]

Mr. Byrne: Data on the incidence of chronic bronchitis and emphysemia and pneumoconiosis are not available centrally.

These conditions are all very closely related and represent one of the most important conditions in the United Kingdom and one of the commonest reasons for admission to hospital. The principle cause is smoking. The national service framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease already has a reduction in cigarette smoking as one of its major targets. We have also banned tobacco advertising and made smoking reduction aids available on national health service prescription. Less important contributory factors are atmospheric pollution and recurrent chest infections.

Strategic health authorities and primary care trusts have all received the NSF for long-term conditions. While the NSF is principally concerned with improving health and social care services for people with a long-term neurological condition, it will address some of the generic issues that are important to people living with a disability that is not necessarily neurological in origin. The principles in the NSF apply equally to improving quality of life and promoting independent living for anyone living with a long-term condition.

Lutein/Zeaxanthin

Damian Green: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will take steps to enable the drugs (a) Lutein and (b) Zeaxanthin to be made available on prescription; and if she will make a statement. [1986]

Jane Kennedy: We have no plans to make Lutein and Zeaxanthin available on prescription on the national health service.

NHS Direct

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many complaints have been made by members of the public regarding the service they received from NHS Direct; and how many were upheld. [6289]


 
7 Jul 2005 : Column 582W
 

Mr. Byrne: I understand from the chair of NHS Direct that during the year April 2004 to March 2005 NHS Direct answered 6,584,000 calls. From these calls, NHS Direct received 1,469 complaints. Of these complaints, 1,128 were able to be resolved locally and 341 required further escalation.

Following investigation, 153 of the complaints were upheld, approximately 0.002 per cent., of the total calls answered.

Frank Dobson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health for what reasons she is proposing to change the status of NHS Direct. [9093]

Mr. Byrne [holding answer 4 July 2005]: The proposed change in the status of NHS Direct is a natural progression of its development to provide and develop responsive health information and advice to the public. It is part of the wider review of arm's length bodies (ALBs) by the Department, which was published in July 2004 by the then Secretary of State for Health. The review set out an overall strategy to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the ALB sector, resulting in a reduction in their number. In the ALB review, a commitment was made to work with NHS Direct to change its governance arrangements.


Next Section Index Home Page