Previous SectionIndexHome Page

The Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Geoffrey Hoon): Before I move the motion, I mention for the benefit of right hon. and hon. Members that I have arranged for a book of condolence to be placed in the Library and if Members want to sign it, as I hope they will, it is now available.

I beg to move,

I thank you, Mr. Speaker, for helpfully summarising my entire speech on the issue so, to save time, I do not intend to repeat it. It is important that we are able to debate the items set out in motions 4 to 40, followed by a separate debate on Standards and Privileges covering motions 41 to 44.

It is in the interests of the House that we agree the motion swiftly and get on to those important debates. I commend the motion to the House.
13 Jul 2005 : Column 839

12.44 pm

Chris Grayling (Epsom and Ewell) (Con): I thank the Leader of the House for establishing a book of condolence, which is entirely appropriate.

I do not have much to add to the right hon. Gentleman's remarks, except that I am glad that the debate is not being artificially guillotined, as often happens, and that we can have a full debate about a wide range of directly linked issues. Let us get on with the main debate.

Question put and agreed to.

13 Jul 2005 : Column 840


Administration Committee

12.44 pm

The Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Geoffrey Hoon): I beg to move,

Mr. Speaker: With this it will be convenient to consider motions 5 to 40.

Mr. Hoon: We have before us in this afternoon's first debate 37 motions that relate to the reappointment of the Select Committees and related matters and to the payment of the Chairmen of Standing and Select Committees. In respect of several motions, explanatory memorandums have been made available in the Vote Office. I hope that they have been of assistance to hon. Members.

I shall start with the first proposal on the creation of an Administration Committee. The motion provides for the Domestic Committees—the Accommodation and Works, Administration, Catering, Information and Broadcasting Committees—to be replaced by a new, single Administration Committee. I believe that to be a
13 Jul 2005 : Column 841
sensible modernising measure. There is a widespread view that the existing structure of the Domestic Committees has become outdated. Convergence in technology makes it no longer appropriate to have separate Broadcasting and Information Committees, for example. There have been occasions when an issue that cuts across more than one Committee has been delayed because the decisions taken by one Committee have had to wait until another Committee has met. A single Committee should allow a more efficient approach, thus ensuring better Member oversight of the services provided throughout the House.

Mr. Graham Allen (Nottingham, North) (Lab): Before the Leader of the House gets too far into the detail of all these motions, will he address an item of principle? It is the role of the House to create departmental Select Committees, whose role is to hold the Government to account. Does he not feel that it is bordering on the politically corrupt for the Government to have such an important influence on selecting the members of those departmental Select Committees? Will he therefore take the chance, after today's debate, to look again at involving Members on both sides of the House in considering whether we could have a better system, perhaps one that involves the election of the members of departmental Select Committees by their colleagues in the House, rather than one that persists in allowing the very organisation that is meant to be scrutinised to have the right to put Members on to the departmental Select Committees of the House?

Mr. Hoon: I disagree with my hon. Friend, not least because the great strength of our Select Committee system is that it reflects the great strength of our political party system both in the House and in the country. It is a matter for the political parties represented in the House to determine the appropriate allocation of Members to the Select Committees. I do not know whether he was present at the most recent meeting of the parliamentary Labour party, where it was made clear that an inordinate amount of time had been spent on transparently and fairly selecting the Labour party's representation. I obviously cannot speak for other political parties in the House, but his own political party went to a great deal of trouble to ensure that the nominations were in accordance with the principles of the Labour party. In those circumstances, I do not believe that he can complain that proper democratic procedures have not been adopted. Those are the proper democratic procedures of his and my political party.

Sir Nicholas Winterton (Macclesfield) (Con): May I perhaps come partly to the aid of the Leader of the House? He will be aware that the Modernisation Committee, which I have no doubt he will be chairing shortly, has considered this matter. Although its recommendations were very narrowly defeated in the House, I am confident that the matter will come before the Modernisation Committee again, and I hope that he is happy that it should do so, so that the House can consider the important matter raised by the hon. Member for Nottingham, North (Mr. Allen).

Mr. Hoon: I am always grateful for all the help that I can get, particularly from such a distinguished source,
13 Jul 2005 : Column 842
but it is important that the will of the political parties is reflected in the way in which Select Committees are appointed. I believe that that is carried out with very commendable concern for democracy and the principles of democracy that inform the House.

Next Section IndexHome Page