Previous Section Index Home Page

31 Oct 2005 : Column 675W—continued

Animal Welfare

Mr. Holloway: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when she expects to introduce the Animal Welfare Bill. [19804]

Mr. Bradshaw: The Animal Welfare Bill had its First Reading in the House of Commons on 13 October.

David Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what qualifications animal welfare inspectors will be required to have in order to carry out their duties under the Animal Welfare Bill; and whether such standards will be set at a national level. [22247]

Mr. Bradshaw [holding answer 27 October 2005]: The Animal Welfare Bill will not impose minimum qualifications for local authority inspectors.

However, local authorities will receive guidance and training from Defra on the new requirements to ensure that standards are as consistent as possible.

Avian Influenza

Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment has been made of the possible timescale for avian influenza spreading (a) through Continental Europe and (b) into the United Kingdom. [21596]

Mr. Bradshaw: The risk assessment that we have carried out on the spread of the avian influenza virus indicates that there is a high risk that the geographical spread will continue, given the recent detections of the virus in various geographical areas since May 2005.

On the evidence that is currently available it is reasonable to conclude that there is an increased risk that the virus may be introduced to the UK as a result of spread elsewhere.

The significant uncertainties associated with an analysis of this sort mean it is impossible to assign reliable time scale to any changes.

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether each animal health office has appointed specialist vets among the State Veterinary Service to deal with potential outbreaks of avian influenza. [20760]

Mr. Bradshaw: Many vets in the SVS have considerable experience and expertise in poultry diseases including avian influenza. Furthermore, confirmation of disease is based on laboratory analysis and not clinical diagnosis in the field. The SVS has recently run a programme of training for veterinary officers to update them on dealing with a potential outbreak of avian influenza.

Bill Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how much the Department plans to spend on avian influenza research in each of the next five years. [22862]

Mr. Bradshaw: The amount the Department invests into research activity on Avian Influenza (AI) will rise from £463,000 during 2005–06 to at least £545,000 during 2006–07.
 
31 Oct 2005 : Column 676W
 

This level may be an underestimate as further new research may be put in place related to questions arising as a result of the current spread of AI.

Because of this it is not possible to give absolute figures for the next five financial years. Other than to state that the level of funding will at least be maintained.

Biosecurity

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will publish the advice offered by her Department to owners of equine animals which travel abroad with regard to (a) avian influenza and (b) West Nile fever. [20764]

Mr. Bradshaw: The Department does not offer advice to owners of equine animals about avian influenza and West Nile Fever. However, notes for guidance accompanying official export health certificates are issued by the Department to certifying veterinarians and exporters of equine animals. Where appropriate these notes give guidance about the need to certify that the exported horse is free from West Nile Fever.

Carbon Allowances

Mr. Holloway: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what her policy is on the allocation of individual carbon allowances in order to help the UK meet Kyoto targets for carbon emissions. [19853]

Mr. Morley: The Government have no plans to use individual carbon allowances or Domestic Tradable Quotas (DTQs) to help the UK meet its Kyoto target. Such concepts, although interesting, are not developed to an extent that would make them feasible.

Correspondence

Mr. Salmond: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when the Minister for Nature, Conservation and Fisheries will reply to the letter from the Member for Banff and Buchan dated 27 August (DEFRA ref 223198) regarding his constituents Mr. and Mrs. W. Ritchie. [21651]

Mr. Bradshaw: I replied to the hon. Member on 26 October.

Cuttlefish

Mr. Sanders: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) if she will fund a study of trends in the number of cuttlefish off the South Devon coast and the causes of changes in numbers; [19796]

(2) if she will make a statement on the state of the cuttlefish population off the South Devon coast. [19797]

Mr. Bradshaw: The cuttlefish population off the South Devon coast is part of the English Channel stock. The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) have only recently completed collaborative studies on this stock. These suggest that the biomass may have increased in recent years. In the meantime, CEFAS continue to monitor trends in landings of the species and catch per unit effort
 
31 Oct 2005 : Column 677W
 
by the beam trawl fleet, the main UK participants in the fishery. Further more detailed analysis will be undertaken as appropriate.

Fallen Stock Scheme

Mike Penning: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on the operation of the Fallen Stock Scheme. [20512]

Mr. Bradshaw: The National Fallen Stock Scheme will have been running for one year next month. The Scheme now has 34,000 members and has made 200,000 fallen stock collections. The Scheme has generally been successful although there were some localised collections difficulties last spring. The National Fallen Stock Company is working with farming organisations and the fallen stock collection industry to address these difficulties and to provide an improved nationwide service in 2006.

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if she will make a statement on how the fallen stock scheme has performed since its inception, with particular reference to the north west. [22177]


 
31 Oct 2005 : Column 678W
 

Mr. Bradshaw: The national fallen stock scheme will have been running for one year next month. The scheme now has 34,000 members and has made 200,000 fallen stock collections. The scheme has generally been successful despite some early teething problems and localised collection difficulties last spring during the lambing season—although these were relatively few in the north west of England. The National Fallen Stock Company continues to work with local and national farming organisations and the fallen stock collection industry to provide an improved nationwide service in 2006.

Fly-tipping

Mr. Burstow: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs pursuant to her answer of 6 July 2005, Official Report, column 418W, on fly-tipping, if she will provide the most recent information she has in the same format. [21042]

Mr. Bradshaw: The Flycapture database was established in April 2004 to record all fly-tips reported to and dealt with by waste collection authorities and the Environment Agency. The following data were recorded to the Flycapture database by waste collection authorities between April 2005 and August 2005.

It is important to note that the data are likely to increase as more authorities submit returns and get better at collecting and reporting the data.
Table 1: Number of incidents of fly-tipping in each English region by land type

RegionHighwayFootpath bridlewayBack alleywayRailwayCouncil land
East Midlands6,9846,305852205,027
East of England11,4462,1522,236148,305
Greater London78,5319,3391,354337,946
North East7,8812,62415,357285,626
North West9,8888,180433,89225210,584
South East25,1483,7263,8894319,370
South West8,01687378032,675
West Midlands11,3573,462991187,240
Yorkshire and Humber9,6627,7652,9223568,317

RegionAgriculturalPrivate residentialCommercial industrialWatercourseOther
East Midlands11782152870183
East of England1291,190296175630
Greater London2621,35841214545
North East288522498106637
North West1331,5136971371,921
South East69886573141536
South West11339188112161
West Midlands3371839369178
Yorkshire and Humber261871457972,794

Table 2: Number of incidents of fly-tipping in each English region by waste type

RegionAnimal carcassGreenVehicle partsWhite goodsOther electricalTyresAsbestosClinical
East Midlands4131,2055611,588436823157167
East of England2451,8937031,60159764314664
Greater London6665,2761,7966,6882,5261,8558768
North East1942,1745121,96079053211071
North West2842,1075444,1758961,003179111
South East6843,7971,4783,6912,0561,78417183
South West3178853931,0674866067393
West Midlands9012,4514331,1584865059590
Yorkshire and Humber2613,8966093,3137131,754186450

 
31 Oct 2005 : Column 679W
 

Construction/ demolition/ excavationBlack bags commercialBlack bags householdChemical drums oil fuelOther householdOther commercialOther
East Midlands1,3595213,9951657,611975925
East of England2,1671,0913,8912089,8619962,331
Greater London6,12811,34221,64818719,9373,82217,768
North East2,9201,2248,0067211,3566732,973
North West3,3241,281424,58432119,7981,8976,690
South East2,0083,27013,00318217,8861,3632,925
South West9701922,3271164,446387854
West Midlands1,0921,3585,248948,7775771,194
Yorkshire and Humber1,6003,12345,49520119,1301,14211,308

Table 3: Number of incidents of fly-tipping in each London borough by land type

HighwayFootpath BridlewayBack alleywayRailwayCouncil land
Corporation of London2014400
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet441,957200
Bexley Council916207
Brent
Bromley1,4301367067
Camden5,6260000
Croydon3,8417162341
Ealing2,3351,5562200
Enfield
Greenwich18311020038
Hackney1440000
Hammersmith and Fulham1911,8120013
Haringey10,1200000
Harrow45325048238
Havering6981575913,429
Hillingdon43601455136
Hounslow3,8081624016
Islington1,5330001
Lambeth6,6650000
Lewisham6,04451652801,651
Merton1,14710045225
Newham
Redbridge1,968015300
Richmond Upon Thames6317565211
Southwark8,891224301,751
Sutton9721000185
Tower Hamlets1861,553200175
Waltham Forest1,4240651956
Wandsworth
Kensington and Chelsea16,7790000
Kingston upon Thames
Westminster City Council2,8711,1652606

AgriculturalPrivate residentialCommercial industrialWatercourseOther
Corporation of London2330000
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet01300133
Bexley Council01000
Brent
Bromley03007
Camden00000
Croydon0303027
Ealing0126000
Enfield
Greenwich0103000
Hackney00000
Hammersmith and Fulham002089
Haringey00000
Harrow0243013
Havering0257348
Hillingdon7177152012
Hounslow2121102
Islington00008
Lambeth00000
Lewisham0665000
Merton08019112
Newham
Redbridge00000
Richmond Upon Thames204900
Southwark0711208
Sutton01362200
Tower Hamlets05206
Waltham Forest0253100
Wandsworth
Kensington and Chelsea00000
Kingston upon Thames
Westminster City Council01590190

 
31 Oct 2005 : Column 681W
 

Table 4: Number of incidents of fly-tipping in each London borough by waste type

Animal carcassGreenVehicle partsWhite goodsOther electricalTyresAsbestosClinical
Corporation of London0724130110
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet1832422753800
Bexley Council042153700
Brent
Bromley0204399657300
Camden00000000
Croydon1035035641974450
Ealing151505323811680110
Enfield
Greenwich20035802220
Hackney00000000
Hammersmith and Fulham08199737100
Haringey00000000
Harrow2530195538300
Havering560610146276207281
Hillingdon0440430080
Hounslow02284582635353
Islington034624017600
Lambeth83211322618343155
Lewisham253623726145041360200
Merton216422110322320
Newham
Redbridge680000000
Richmond Upon Thames096870122460
Southwark20664467748585165144
Button26221102312861
Tower Hamlets4705712427400
Waltham Forest6726201201002042
Wandsworth
Kensington and Chelsea27969122133550361110
Kingston Upon Thames
Westminster City Council3402110568222

Construction/ demolition/ excavationBlack bags commercialBlack bags HouseholdChemical drums oil fuelOther householdOther commercialOther
Corporation of London45922581180
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet2296324615727191282
Bexley Council2111313235
Brent
Bromley29238305135347134
Camden0000005,626
Croydon4261,5371,023256041
Ealing33366741672711,439
Enfield
Greenwich456010307080
Hackney37912118823
Hammersmith and Fulham10533308380824601
Haringey02,3322,3320005,456
Harrow453123152224582
Havering141341,89187426065
Hillingdon5068432015353219
Hounslow1061,1731,26511320126411
Islington99530211738356133
Lambeth868223737502,391312892
Lewisham1,2624921,07102,2492630
Merton1765040933105177
Newham
Redbridge0039401,65900
Richmond Upon Thames78102061293112
Southwark5843522,480213,539542622
Button2602096141957219
Tower Hamlets57271514029346984
Waltham Forest522410309669719
Wandsworth
Kensington and Chelsea1,0593,2386,013372,89743968
Kingston Upon Thames
Westminster City Council12233874748896711,268




Note:
1. Fly-tipping data based on returns reported to the Flycapture database between April 2005 and August 2005.
2. No data are shown where an authority has failed to submit returns.





 
31 Oct 2005 : Column 683W
 


Next Section Index Home Page