Previous SectionIndexHome Page


22. Barbara Keeley (Worsley) (Lab): What steps the Government are taking to encourage young women and girls to participate in politics. [24356]

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (Meg Munn): Citizenship is taught in all
3 Nov 2005 : Column 968
schools as part of the national curriculum, and it includes the electoral system and the importance of voting. The women and equality unit has produced a special resource pack for teachers and young people that includes ideas on how to cover women's equality issues in citizenship classes.

Barbara Keeley : Last week, I was visited in Parliament by a young woman from Wigan called Michaela who is a member of the Youth Parliament and is very interested in politics and political life. What steps is my hon. Friend taking to increase women's representation in politics at different levels, so that if that young woman decides to graduate from the Youth Parliament to the House of Commons the gender balance is rather different?

Meg Munn: I thank my hon. Friend for her question. As the first woman MP for Worsley she is an excellent role model for her young constituent. The Youth Parliament could certainly teach us a thing or two about the ratio of male to female Members, because it is 49:51. Much of this is a matter for political parties, but the Labour Government passed the Sex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002 to allow political parties to use positive measures to encourage more women to stand for election.—[Interruption.] I can understand why Opposition Members are shouting at me—they do not want to face up to their failure.

Business of the House

11.32 am

Chris Grayling (Epsom and Ewell) (Con): Will the Leader of the House give us the business for next week?

The Leader of the House of Commons (Mr. Geoffrey Hoon): The business for next week is as follows:

Monday 7 November—Second Reading of the Council Tax (New Valuation Lists for England) Bill.

Tuesday 8 November—Consideration in Committee of the Electoral Administration Bill.

Wednesday 9 November—Report stage of the Terrorism Bill.

Thursday 10 November—Third Reading of the Terrorism Bill.

Friday 11 November—Private Members' Bills.

The provisional business for the following week will be:

Monday 14 November—Remaining stages of the Violent Crime Reduction Bill.

Tuesday 15 November—Opposition Day [9th allotted day]. There will be a debate on an Opposition motion. Subject to be announced.

Wednesday 16 November—Remaining stages of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Bill.

Thursday 17 November—A debate on defence in the UK on a motion for the Adjournment of the House.

Friday 18 November—The House will not be sitting.

I should also like to inform the House that the business in Westminster Hall for the rest of November will be:

Thursday 10 November—A debate on maximising women's skills in the UK economy.

Thursday 17 November—A debate on the report from the Home Affairs Committee on the rehabilitation of prisoners.

Thursday 24 November—a debate on the report from the Transport Committee on "Road Pricing: The Next Steps."

Chris Grayling: Will the Leader of the House update Members on the Terrorism Bill? He will be aware that yesterday, after the Government's majority was reduced to one on the issue of indirect incitement, the Home Secretary asked for a delay in the vote on the 90-day detention plan. When will that vote take place, and does he expect any further changes to the programming of the Terrorism Bill before next week?

Last week, the Leader of the House failed to answer my question about why the Government have not yet followed the recommendation from the Committee on Standards in Public Life to create an adviser on ministerial interests. Sir Alistair Graham has been highly critical of the Government on the subject, so when will the Leader of the House introduce proposals to that effect?

Yesterday, many thousands of people came in the rain to lobby the House on trade, justice and poverty issues, and many expressed concern that those issues would not be made a priority at the World Trade
3 Nov 2005 : Column 970
Organisation talks in Hong Kong in December. Given all that the Government have said in the past few months about development issues, may we have a statement from the Prime Minister before the Hong Kong talks so that he can brief the House about how Britain intends to push the agenda forward? May we also have a debate in Government time so that Members again have the opportunity to make their views heard on this vital issue?

May we also have a debate on the sub judice rules and the Procedure Committee's report on those rules? The right hon. Gentleman will be aware that the issues are sensitive. They have been raised a number of times in the House in the past few weeks by right hon. and hon. Members and they need to be resolved. Without resolution, they are constraining many of the activities of some of our Committees.

When will the House see a copy of the proposed legislation on terrorists on the run in Northern Ireland? I understand that the Government have already shown those proposals to Sinn Fein. Does the right hon. Gentleman think it right that Members who have not taken up their seats should see proposed legislation before those who have?

We are now into November and the Government have still provided no further information about either the date of the pre-Budget report or the proposed dates for the parliamentary year. Neither of those are sensitive issues, so why the delay?

Mr. Hoon: Given the detailed debates that took place yesterday on the Terrorism Bill and which will again take place later when we reach the main business, I am slightly surprised that the hon. Gentleman is concerned that there is not enough opportunity to discuss these matters. I have already mentioned that there will be two further days of debate next week, so I am sure that my right hon. Friend the Home Secretary will continue his determined efforts to ensure that we have an effective measure for dealing with the terrorist threat in the United Kingdom, one that, incidentally, commands the   very strong support of most people in this country.

We have a ministerial code—[Interruption.] I am sorry that hon. Members are scoffing, because I was about to make the point that that code has been applied by successive Prime Ministers, the majority of whom have been Conservative ones, and it is thus important to emphasise that this is a matter for the Prime Minister—a matter that he takes extraordinarily seriously.

The hon. Gentleman is right to raise the issues of trade, justice and poverty. I saw the long lines of people who came to Westminster yesterday to lobby. This is an important issue for people throughout the country, and I am delighted that the Government have responded in the way that they have, by leading the way around the world in ensuring that these matters are taken seriously; and in our meetings of the G8, the EU and other international bodies we are the leaders in putting these issues firmly, squarely and fairly before the international community.

The important issue of sub judice will obviously be subject to further consideration. We have had a report, but I understood from the Chairman of the Procedure Committee that it was contemplating looking at the matter again, so obviously it is important that we
3 Nov 2005 : Column 971
continue to ensure, as I have said to the House before, that we do not make comments or statements that can affect court proceedings, subject of course to the importance of right hon. and hon. Members being able to raise these matters.

The Bill dealing with so-called on-the-runs will be published shortly, as will the parliamentary calendar and the date of the pre-Budget report.

May I just raise one matter with the hon. Gentleman? I have seen that he has been dubbed in some newspapers as the jackal. As someone who in the past has been the victim of the sketch writers, may I sympathise with the   hon. Gentleman? I say that because I took the trouble to look up the definition of a jackal, and it was described as a medium-sized, opportunistic scavenger with dog-like features and large ears. I offer my sympathies to the hon. Gentleman about that rather unkind and totally unfair comparison.

Next Section IndexHome Page