Previous Section Index Home Page

8 Nov 2005 : Column 436W—continued

Waiting Lists/Times

Mrs. Iris Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland pursuant to his answer of 20 October 2005, Official Report, column 1238W, on waiting lists, if he will take steps to record waiting times for radiotherapy in the Province. [24916]

Mr. Woodward: There is no evidence to suggest that there is any difficulty accessing radiotherapy services in Northern Ireland. A national audit of radiotherapy waiting times has recently been carried out by the Royal College of Radiologists. Data were collected for all patients who commenced treatment in Northern Ireland during the week beginning 26 September 2005. Preliminary local analysis indicates that no emergency patient waited more than 24 hours and that waiting times for other patients were in line with national guidelines. The Department has no plans to record waiting times for radiotherapy on an ongoing basis.

Appeals

Lady Hermon: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what percentage of Crown court convictions in Northern Ireland have been successfully appealed in each of the last five years. [25640]

Bridget Prentice: I have been asked to reply.
Number of Crown court convictions (non-scheduled)No. of convictions quashed in Court of AppealPercentage of appeals quashed compared to convictions in the Crown
200496250
200374200
200267020
200163550
200076150

Lady Hermon: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what percentage of convictions in the Diplock courts have been successfully appealed in each of the last five years. [25641]

Bridget Prentice: I have been asked to reply.
Number of Diplock convictionsNumber of convictions quashed in Court of AppealPercentage of appeals quashed compared to convictions in the Diplock Courts
20043000
20035324
20024712
200122314
200035514

 
8 Nov 2005 : Column 437W
 

Teacher Training

Sammy Wilson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how much has been spent on teacher training in the Province in each of the last five years. [25793]

Angela E. Smith: Funds allocated for teacher training in Northern Ireland in each of the last five financial years are provided in the table.
Funds allocated for teacher training in Northern Ireland between 2001–02 and 2005–06

£ million
Actual allocation
2001–0231.855
2002–0332.409
2003–0435.129
2004–0536.057
Estimated allocation
2005–0641.090

 
8 Nov 2005 : Column 438W
 

Telecommunications Masts

Mr. Peter Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland how many planning applications there have been to construct or add to existing telecommunication masts in each local authority in Northern Ireland in each of the last 10 years; and how many applications were (a) approved and (b) refused in each year. [25156]

Angela E. Smith: The number of applications to construct or add to existing telecommunication masts is set out in the following table.
Number of applications for telecommunication masts by council area between 2000 and 2005 (including prior approval applications)

Council area200020012002200320042005(33)
Antrim1719171169
Ards26227435
Armagh332114832
Ballymena341715150
Ballymoney733011
Banbridge19512300
Belfast4813469362315
Carrickfergus765022
Castlereagh82013562
Coleraine163320155
Cookstown1564210
Craigavon30211421111
Derry2344219209
Down222610797
Dungannon452513781
Fermanagh24198562
Larne11169311
Limavady181412624
Lisburn43473712179
Magherafelt1239233
Moyle1245504
Newry and Mourne341519469
Newtownabbey1425144104
North Down2735116196
Omagh241610437
Strabane12124112


(33) So far.


It is only possible to provide accurate data for the last five years as all the information for previous years is not held electronically and could be extracted only at a disproportionate cost.

It should be noted that figures up to 2002 also include applications made under the prior approval process. In June 2002 Permitted Development rights were removed by statute except in the case of an emergency and applications for telecommunications equipment were subject to the full planning process.

Details of how many applications were refused or approved since 2000 is set out in the following table.
Decisions issued on telecommunication masts by council area between 2000 and 2005

2000
2001
2002
Council areaRefusedApprovedRefusedApprovedRefusedApproved
Antrim11349412
Ards31911205
Armagh727518212
Ballymena017214014
Ballymoney140404
Banbridge01106012
Belfast83011106561
Carrickfergus020802
Castlereagh0821537
Coleraine36826514
Cookstown381511
Craigavon22212537
Derry118634318
Down21871417
Dungannon72810939
Fermanagh5152603
Larne01229110
Limavady21411107
Lisburn126228426
Magherafelt0422011
Moyle081603
Newry and Mourne52591006
Newtownabbey214121211
North Down128630220
Omagh4103802
Strabane0201007

 
8 Nov 2005 : Column 439W
 

2003
2004
2005(34)
Council areaRefusedApprovedRefusedApprovedRefusedApproved
Antrim0110806
Ards070204
Armagh110504
Ballymena020202
Ballymoney000001
Banbridge020100
Belfast223126311
Carrickfergus020102
Castlereagh060206
Coleraine130004
Cookstown020200
Craigavon1306010
Derry0607412
Down030414
Dungannon041721
Fermanagh140604
Larne030100
Limavady050603
Lisburn1911717
Magherafelt000211
Moyle050112
Newry and Mourne310107
Newtownabbey140705
North Down0616114
Omagh370304
Strabane020101


(34) So far.


It should be noted that there is no direct correlation between the number of applications submitted per year and the number of decisions issued.

Mr. Peter Robinson: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what steps he plans to put in place for telecommunication mast sharing. [25157]

Angela E. Smith: Prevailing planning policy for telecommunications development in Northern Ireland, set out in Planning Policy Statement (PPS) 10 'Telecommunications', already strongly encourages the sharing of masts where this represents the best environmental option in a particular case.

To promote sharing through the planning process, the PPS advises that all applications for new masts should be accompanied by evidence that the possibility of erecting antennas on an existing building, mast or other structure has been explored and should outline the
 
8 Nov 2005 : Column 440W
 
specific reasons why this course of action is not possible. Where the evidence regarding the consideration of alternative options is not considered satisfactory, then planning permission can be refused.


Next Section Index Home Page