Previous Section Index Home Page

10 Nov 2005 : Column 658W—continued

Student Task Force

John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what proportion of the 1,206 colleges visited by his Department's student task force were judged to be (a) genuine colleges and (b) not genuine colleges. [26668]

Andy Burnham: Between April 2004 and December 2004, 1,218 educational institutions were visited and 314 (25 per cent.) were found not to be genuine. All applications from students to study at institutions found not to be genuine were refused.

Terrorist Attacks (London)

Chris Huhne: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to the Answer of 10 October 2005, Official Report, column 180W, on terrorist attacks in London, how long it took to reach each underground train affected by the incidents. [24245]

Hazel Blears: After consultation with the Metropolitan Police Service, the British Transport Police, the London Fire Brigade Service and the London Ambulance Service I can inform the hon. Member that the information he has requested is not readily available.

Following normal practice, the London Ambulance Service did not record the times that their paramedics and technicians reached the trains, only the stations which were the locations given in the 999 calls. This also applies to the Metropolitan Police Service, the British Transport Police and the London Fire Brigade.

It is considered that to collate the information requested could be obtained only at disproportionate cost as it would require information from each of the individual responders from the emergency services.

I can inform the hon. Member that the London Underground have provided information that in respect of the Aldgate and Edgware Road incidents, London Underground staff reached the trains within 3–5 minutes of the blasts occurring.
 
10 Nov 2005 : Column 659W
 

In respect of the Kings Cross incident, London Underground staff reached the train within 3–7 minutes of the blasts occurring. Again, exact arrival times are not recorded.

DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER

Belfast Protocol

Joan Walley: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what action he will take in response to the publication of the Belfast Protocol by the British Toilet Association on 11 October; and if he will make a statement. [26623]

Mr. Woolas: I met with the British Toilet Association on 11 October to discuss good practice in public toilet provision. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister will work with the BTA to produce further guidance, including examples of best practice. This will be undertaken as part of our How To Deliver Cleaner, Safer, Greener Communities" good practice programme.

Departmental Estate

David Howarth: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what information he collects on (a) the number of buildings, (b) the number of staff working from each building and (c) the management of the buildings in (i)his Department and (ii) its executive agencies. [24412]

Jim Fitzpatrick: Information collected by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is as follows:

(a) Number of buildings

(b) Number of staff working from each building


Number
Ashdown House Victoria329
Eland House, Victoria1,368
Hempstead House95
Glossop3
Building 3 Garston13
Marchington49
Fire Experimental Unit, Moreton-in-Marsh8
Admiralty House, 26 Whitehall153
Allington Towers, Victoria143
Ashdown House, Hastings40
Exchange Tower, London13
Temple Quay House, Bristol29

 
10 Nov 2005 : Column 660W
 


Full-time equivalents
Fire Service College296.2
Planning Inspectorate821.14
Queen Elizabeth II Conference Centre53.3

(c) Management of the buildings

This answer does not include buildings occupied by Government offices, which carry out functions on behalf of 10 Government Departments.

Departmental Funding

Mike Penning: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much funding was allocated by his Department to Hemel Hempstead constituency for (a) capital projects and (b) revenue funding in the last eight years. [25742]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) does not hold separate expenditure information on the Hemel Hempstead constituency.

The following table sets out payments made to Dacorum borough council since the ODPM was established following the Machinery of Government changes on 29 May 2002. For earlier years (from 1999–2000), the table shows the amount paid by ODPM's predecessor Departments from programmes which are now administered by the Office.
All figures (£ million)

Funding to Dacorum borough(a) Capital(b) Revenue
1999–20001.3547.504
2000–012.9587.868
2001–026.1908.488
2002–035.2378.608
2003–044.3158.800
2004–053.8738.159
Total23.92749.247








 
10 Nov 2005 : Column 661W
 

Departmental Spending

Dr. Starkey: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how much funding was allocated by his Department to Milton Keynes for (a) capital projects and (b) revenue funding in each of the last five years. [23503]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) was established following the Machinery of Government changes on 29 May 2002. The following table sets out payments made to Milton Keynes since 2002–03. For earlier years, the table shows the amount paid by ODPM's predecessor Departments from programmes which are now administered by ODPM.
Funding
£ million

CapitalRevenue
2000–010.012131.448
2001–0214.050132.734
2002–0332.200138.753
2003–0426.455162.572
2004–0553.473173.529
Total126.190739.036


Next Section Index Home Page