Previous Section Index Home Page

15 Nov 2005 : Column 1111W—continued

DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER

Departmental Priorities

Mr. Jim Cunningham: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will make a statement on his Department's priorities for 2006–07. [28064]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The aim of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, (ODPM) is to help create sustainable communities, working with other Government Departments, local councils, businesses, the voluntary sector, and communities themselves.

We have five year plans, a challenging set of public service agreement targets and strategic priorities which set the overall framework, as set out in our Annual Report for 2004–05 (Cm 6526). They are published in the ODPM Business Plan for 2005–06 which can be found on the ODPM website.

We have recently completed a stock take of our policies and programmes to ensure that we have full alignment across these programmes, to maximise our impact in delivery, and to sharpen our focus in advance of the Comprehensive Spending Review in 2007. The conclusions are set out in the core narrative on the ODPM website.

English Partnerships

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when English Partnerships' future national programme for the years 2005–06 to 2008–09 is expected to be announced. [27509]

Yvette Cooper: Discussions are currently under way with English Partnerships on their future national programme and priorities for the years 2005–06 to 2008–09. Once these planning round discussions have been finalised, which is likely to be in the next two months, English Partnerships corporate priorities will be published.
 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1112W
 

Funding for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister programmes, including English Partnerships, for 2008–09 to 2010–11 will be dependent on the results of the Comprehensive Spending Review 2007.

Free Bus Passes

Tim Loughton: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister when he expects to answer the letter from the hon. Member for East Worthing and Shoreham of 21 September regarding payments to Adur council for extension of free bus travel for pensioners. [28231]

Mr. Woolas: I replied to the hon. Member on 10 November.

Housing

Mr. Dismore: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what the percentage change has been in average weekly rent in constant prices in (a) the local authority and (b) the registered social landlord sector in each (i) London borough and (ii) English region since 2001. [24269]

Yvette Cooper: Average weekly rent by local authority district and region are published for the local authority sector and the registered social landlord sector on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website in Tables 702 and Tables 704 respectively. The links for these tables are given as follows:

Table 702: http://www.odpm.gov.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=1156266

Table 704: http://www.odpm.gov.uk/embedded_object.asp?id:=1156268

These tables will be updated with information for 2005 late this month. The percentage changes from March 2001 to March 2004 are given in the Tables:

(i) London boroughs
Table 1: Percentage change in average weekly rent at constant prices 2001 to 2004 for London boroughs

Registered Social Landlord (RSL) % increaseLocal Authority Landlord % increase
Barking and Dagenham2.23.8
Barnet2.75.0
Bexley-2.2LSVT
Brent7.3-3.4
Bromley0.1LSVT
Camden4.9-2.6
City of London7.75.5
Croydon1.2-3.6
Ealing6.2-5.7
Enfield6.9-0.5
Greenwich6.22.7
Hackney5.3-7.3
Hammersmith and Fulham6.33.4
Haringey3.3-1.8
Harrow1.12.2
Havering3.25.1
Hillingdon4.20.4
Hounslow3.04.4
Islington6.9-2.9
Kensington and Chelsea8.15.6
Kingston upon Thames6.20.4
Lambeth5.13.2
Lewisham6.20.7
Merton1.90.2
Newham3.53.4
Redbridge3.6-6.3
Richmond upon Thames0.9LSVT
Southwark5.9-1.0
Sutton3.85.3
Tower Hamlets7.9-8.0
Wandsworth5.09.8
Waltham Forest-1.01.4
Westminster6.31.2
London4.10.1




Notes:
1. RSL data based on data collected by the Housing Corporation via the annual Regulatory and Statistical Return (RSR) LA data based on unaudited returns from the Second Subsidy Claim form and are provisional for 2004.
2. Constant prices based on the Retail Price Index.
3. Average Weekly Rents in Both Sectors are affected by Large Scale Voluntary Transfers (LSVT).
4. LSVT": all or most of the local authority stock has been transferred to the RSL sector, so an average rent is no longer appropriate.





 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1113W
 

(ii) English Regions
Table 2: Percentage change in average weekly rent at constant prices 2001 to 2004 for English regions

Registered Social Landlord % increaseLocal Authority Landlord % increase
North East0.01.6
North West4.01.0
Yorkshire and the Humber4.8-1.0
East Midlands-0.73.5
West Midlands2.62.8
East1.31.8
London4.10.1
South East1.63.0
South West2.10.3
England0.82.9




Notes:
1. RSL data based on data collected by the Housing Corporation via the annual Regulatory and Statistical Return (RSR) LA data based on un-audited returns from the Second Subsidy Claim form and are provisional for 2004.
2. Constant prices based on the Retail Price Index.
3. Average Weekly Rents in Both Sectors are affected by Large Scale Voluntary Transfers (LSVT). If Large Scale Voluntary Transfers have taken place the average weekly rents may be affected by the change in the mix of the stock.





 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1114W
 

Jim Cousins: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many households were on the housing register of each local housing authority in the north-east in each year from 2000 to 2005; and what that number of households was as a percentage of all households. [26187]

Yvette Cooper: The available information is in a table and has been placed in the Library of the House.

Local authorities in England report the numbers of households on their housing waiting list as at 1 April in their annual Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix returns. Local authorities sometimes maintain a common waiting list with the housing association/s in their district. However, information is not held centrally where a housing association maintains a separate waiting list to the local authority.
Number of households on local authorities' housing waiting lists, and as a percentage of total households in the area, by each local authority in the north-east region, 2000–05

Total households on the housing waiting list
Local authority200020012002200320042005
Alnwick7735688029611,1551,192
Berwick-upon-Tweed523566455492455756
Blyth Valley2,1101,8781,9662,2232,7533,637
Castle Morpeth1,0831,4247192,0481,4261,419
Chester-le-Street1,3141,6981,8272,0282,3662,464
Darlington2,0872,1271,8862,6662,6012,853
Derwentside2,2492,2272,2692,6522,9202,965
Durham1,0281,1261,0911,4132,1102,618
Easington3,0942,5463,2052,8423,6222,015
Gateshead4,6654,8415,3946,0159,8944,174
Hartlepool2,3742,0262,9983,0337,3103,222
Middlesbrough3,3122,9122,9213,3314,3245,217
Newcastle upon Tyne4,3615,3536,2896,62510,23013,099
North Tyneside3,2742,4772,8603,3504,0284,325
Redcar and Cleveland2,7772,6392,6452,9392,4243,250
Sedgefield6207766908411,8192,364
South Tyneside12,2458,68110,20310,79812,3258,649
Stockton-on-Tees5,3124,3953,9623,8923,7363,485
Sunderland4,4765,1565,76422,32325,82716,222
Teesdale350343367377387298
Tynedale8201,2511,0111,1041,3381,576
Wansbeck1,0217367009861,4281,244
Wear Valley2,2481,2702,2372,4821,4752,703
Total north-east region62,11657,01662,26185,421105,95389,747

As a percentage of total households in area
Local authority200020012002200320042005
Alnwick646789
Berwick-upon-Tweed454446
Blyth Valley6566810
Castle Morpeth5741077
Chester-le-Street67891011
Darlington554667
Derwentside666788
Durham333467
Easington868795
Gateshead6667125
Hartlepool6588209
Middlesbrough655679
Newcastle upon Tyne4556911
North Tyneside433455
Redcar and Cleveland544546
Sedgefield222256
South Tyneside181315161813
Stockton-on-Tees765555
Sunderland445192214
Teesdale434443
Tynedale354456
Wansbeck433455
Wear Valley95910610
Percentage north-east region6568108




Source:
The number of households on the waiting lists from ODPM's Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix return. Figures are as at 1 April.
Total household figures from ODPM's 2003 mid-year household estimates.





 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1115W
 

Mr. Betts: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister if he will commission research to update the affordability index used to determine the areas included within the scope of the Housing (Right-to-Buy) (Limits on Discounts) (Amendments) Order 2003. [26238]

Yvette Cooper: The Housing (Right-to-Buy) (Limits on Discount) (Amendment) Order 2003 came into force on 27 March 2003. It reduced to 16,000 the maximum right-to-buy discount available to tenants in 41 areas in London and the South of England that appeared to be under the greatest housing market pressure in terms of high levels of homelessness and high property prices. The Government is keeping the position on maximum right-to-buy discounts generally under review.

Mike Penning: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what estimate he has made of the cost of additional public services which will be required by people living in the proposed new housing in Hertfordshire. [26348]

Yvette Cooper: The Government's approach is to ensure that infrastructure, including public services, is provided in step with growth, as plans for individual growth locations are developed. There are three elements to this: first, to ensure that main public expenditure programmes, such as health and education, are sufficiently flexible and responsive to the needs of growing communities; second, to secure an appropriate contribution from developers and private investors; and third, to provide additional support through growth areas funds, including the Community Infrastructure Fund.

Hertfordshire and the rest of the East of England have already benefited from a significant increase in identifiable public expenditure, receiving £28.1 billion in 2003–04—a 26 per cent. real terms increase on 1999–2000. In particular between 1999–2000 and 2003–04:


 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1116W
 

The East of England Regional Assembly has submitted its draft Regional Spatial Strategy for the East of England to Government. Following extensive public consultation, that draft strategy is now subject to an independent Examination in Public, which began on 1 November and runs to early March 2006.

It is for the Examination in Public, after considering all the evidence and representations before it, to make recommendations to Government on the appropriate long-term strategy for the scale and location of development in the East of England.

Once Government have received the recommendations of the Examination in Public, and consulted on any changes it proposes, the final strategy will be issued. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister is already engaged in discussions with partners on infrastructure and growth issues in the East of England and we will develop plans further in the light of the final strategy. Public service providers will then have the long-term certainty they need in which to plan future levels of service provision. Detailed development decisions need to be made at the local level as part of the preparation of local development documents.

Jim Cousins: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many (a) demolitions and (b) empty properties (i) across all sectors and (ii) in council housing there were in each local housing authority in the North East in each year from 2000 to 2005. [26186]

Yvette Cooper: The available information is in a table and has been placed in the Library of the House.
 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1117W
 

Table for PQ 2024—number of all tenure and council demolished and empty dwellings by each local authority in the north east region 2000 to 2005.

Part A—number of demolished dwellings in the financial year
Total dwellings demolished
Local authority name2000–012001–022002–032003–042004–05
Alnwick0200n/a
Berwick-upon-Tweed(1)(1)(1)(1)n/a
Blyth Valley0000n/a
Castle Morpeth(1)010n/a
Chester-le-Street002438n/a
Darlington174124156n/a
Derwentside1062043152n/a
Durham17200n/a
Easington(1)1779963n/a
Gateshead91310155224n/a
Hartlepool1558207n/a
Middlesbrough6178343161n/a
Newcastle upon Tyne383612531485n/a
North Tyneside23849914914n/a
Redcar and Cleveland5428516987n/a
Sedgefield(1)543028n/a
South Tyneside5213022937n/a
Stockton-on-Tees(1)74149154n/a
Sunderland471165203280n/a
Teesdale(1)000n/a
Tynedale0011n/a
Wansbeck2764711319n/a
Wear Valley45207162144n/a

Council dwellings demolished
Local authority name2000–012001–022002–032003–042004–05
Alnwick0(1)00n/a
Berwick-upon-Tweed(1)(1)(1)(1)n/a
Blyth Valley0000n/a
Castle Morpeth(1)000n/a
Chester-le-Street002432n/a
Darlington1699360n/a
Derwentside106203124n/a
Durham17200n/a
Easington13109914n/a
Gateshead882422068n/a
Hartlepool034195n/a
Middlesbrough1976335132-n/a
Newcastle upon Tyne383462493437n/a
North Tyneside22947610412n/a
Redcar and Cleveland5328316969n/a
Sedgefield(1)0300n/a
South Tyneside4712622622n/a
Stockton-on-Tees(1)74138154n/a
Sunderland455000n/a
Teesdale(1)000n/a
Tynedale0000n/a
Wansbeck2764671219n/a
Wear Valley360159134n/a


(1) Indicates that no data was submitted.
Note:
n/a means data not yet ready to publish.
Source:
Housing Flows Reconciliation return





Part B—number of empty dwellings (All figures to be treated as for 1 April)

All dwellings
HSSA+RSR returns data
CTB1 return data
Local authority name200020012002200320042005
Alnwick438441453580726571
Berwick-upon-Tweed331(2)608655544614
Blyth Valley988798634844940789
Castle Morpeth579790806805658774
Chester-le-Street685741877643726582
Darlington2,1862,0951,9031,5911,8231,660
Derwentside1,7561,8241,7721,6721,7071,669
Durham2,5301,522(2)1,2386731,282
Easington3,0222,8782,0461,8941,8601,880
Gateshead3,3873,2133,4916,2055,5195,488
Hartlepool1,7521,7081,9111,9031,7011,925
Middlesbrough4,4121,9772,7413,1513,1912,833
Newcastle upon Tyne8,0453,5837,3527,5557,2756,141
North Tyneside4,0243,8142,9122,8202,7842,877
Redcar and Cleveland2,8282,8222,7062,6262,5502,225
Sedgefield7991,3621,5241,5501,3581,965
South Tyneside1,4662,5783,7571,8141,7371,997
Stockton-on-Tees2,5023,0463,0342,8362,6672,319
Sunderland3,7804,0392,7713,6284,1404,114
Teesdale(2)508513607613656
Tynedale1,079583619834862782
Wansbeck9791,5058511,1521,0451,031
Wear Valley1,9632,5041,7361,5861,5111,558

 
15 Nov 2005 : Column 1119W
 

LA dwellings only

HSSA return
data
Local authority name200020012002200320042005
Alnwick282225271531
Berwick-upon-Tweed3131011118
Blyth Valley565357637454
Castle Morpeth96137201160158165
Chester-le-Street14019916318115261
Darlington211150138180163136
Derwentside283304425405491332
Durham243239182137117137
Easington822910835826768490
Gateshead601463460471525472
Hartlepool18721818015500
Middlesbrough5055977665717170
Newcastle upon Tyne1,5421,7781,8831,3981,4131,151
North Tyneside1,1191,057622518404524
Redcar and Cleveland337438313000
Sedgefield373299223175138112
South Tyneside495518489608449607
Stockton-on-Tees941943756724489373
Sunderland1,10200000
Teesdale182426587257
Tynedale000000
Wansbeck617496304204255200
Wear Valley321445358357392299


(2) Indicates that no data was submitted.
Note:
Zero LA figures indicates council became LSVT.
Source:
Council Tax Base 1 (CTB1) return for all dwellings from 2003 to 2005, all others from Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix (HSSA) return.




Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many of the planned 75,000 social rented houses planned to be built by 2007–08 will be provided by local authorities. [22253]

Yvette Cooper: Of the estimated 75,000 social rented houses to be provided by 2007–08 we estimate that up to some 3,000 will be provided by local authorities.

Since 1990 registered social landlords (RSLs) have been the main providers of additional affordable housing. They are generally able to deliver more units than local authorities for a given amount of public subsidy because of their ability to access private finance.


Next Section Index Home Page