|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Burns: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many delayed discharges there were in England in each of the last six years for which figures are available; and if she will make a statement. 
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Health if she will arrange for UK-based students qualifying for dentistry to undertake a period of employment in the NHS in return for full or partial remittance of fees. 
Ms Rosie Winterton:
On graduation, almost all newly qualified dentists undertake one year's vocational training in a dental practice with a significant
21 Nov 2005 : Column 1709W
commitment to national health service dentistry. Some primary care trusts (PCTs), in areas where there are shortages of NHS dentists, already offer inducement payments to dentists to undertake their vocational training in their areas. We are encouraging PCTs to build on this experience by considering other innovative methods of attracting dentists to make their careers in the NHS. I will ensure the review team is aware of my hon. Friend's suggestion.
21 Nov 2005 : Column 1710W
|Consumption kilowatt-hour (kWh)|
Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what steps have been taken in the context of assessment of the environmental impact of her Department to provide a clear description of her Department's estate, including executive agencies, staff numbers, buildings and land management. 
The Department reports annually on its progress against the targets contained in the Framework for Sustainable Development on the Government Estate". The data for 200405 is currently being analysed by independent consultants. It will shortly be published, with a commentary by the Sustainable Development Commission, on the Government's sustainable development website at www.sustainable-development.gov.uk. The data for 200304 is currently available on the website.
Helen Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what action she is taking following the publication of the report by the Audit Commission entitled Early Lessons From Payment By Results". 
Mr. Byrne [holding answer 7 November 2005]: The Audit Commission's report, Early Lessons from Payment by Results" (October 2005), provides useful insight into the experience of those national health service organisations at the forefront of implementing payment by results. Many of the key recommendations from the report are either already being implemented or are being taken forward for subsequent years.
For example, the Department has consulted on a draft code of conduct, which aims to establish clear expectations on how organisations will conduct business under payment by results and the Department will be finalising the code of conduct for next year.
In addition, the Department is working with the Audit Commission to develop an assurance framework for payment by results, which will focus on improving data quality and assuring the appropriateness of payments. Tariff changes for 200607 will be announced in due course.
21 Nov 2005 : Column 1711W
The service also provides the NHS nationally with vital information on the availability of intensive care beds via the centrally funded intensive care bed register. This service is available 24 hours a day; seven days a week; 365 days a year.
Mike Penning: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what criteria were used in setting the funding allocation for (a) Lambeth primary care trust and (b) Dacorum primary care trust for 200506; and if she will make a statement; 
Ms Rosie Winterton: Revenue allocations are made directly to primary care trusts (PCTs) on the basis of the relative needs of their populations. A weighted capitation formula is used to determine each PCT's target share of available resources.
The components of the formula are used to weight each PCTs crude population according to their relative need (age, and additional need) for health care and the unavoidable geographical differences in the cost of providing health care (market forces factor).
Caroline Flint: An application for authorisation of products derived from GA21 maize was made to the Dutch authorities in 1998 under the novel foods regulation (EC) No. 258/97. The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is the UK Competent Authority under the novel foods regulation and seeks expert advice on the safety of Genetically Modified foods from the independent Advisory Committee on Novel Foods and Processes (ACNFP).
The dossier on GA21 maize was reviewed by the ACNFP during 2000. They identified certain shortcomings in the available data and its advice formed the basis of the United Kingdom's objection to the initial assessment report from the Dutch Competent
21 Nov 2005 : Column 1712W
Authority. These shortcomings, and questions raised by other member states, were addressed by Monsanto in a supplementary dossier that they provided to the EC Scientific Committee on Food (SCF) for further assessment. The SCF concluded in March 2002 that GA21 maize is as safe as conventional, non-GM maize.
As the supplementary data and the SCF evaluation answered the ACNFP's initial questions, the FSA has advised Ministers that GA21 maize meets the necessary criteria for authorisation. The UK therefore voted in favour when European Union member states voted on the authorisation of GA21 maize in April and October of this year.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|