|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Cameron: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills on what criteria the decision to close Belford College in Werneth, Oldham, was based; how much notice was given to parents of learners; and what alternative provision will be made. 
Bill Rammell: The Learning and Skills Council (LSC) informed Belford College on 17 October 2005 that it would terminate its contract for the provision of education and training. Pending a final decision about the College's future, the LSC has appointed a dedicated team of educational advisers, experienced in the field of complex learning difficulties and/or disabilities, to ensure appropriate alternative provision is focused for the young people affected. This team has been working with parents, Connexions and other local partners to explore appropriate options for the young people. They are now finalising the details of alternative arrangements that are intended to take effect from January 2006 for all 11 learners at the College. A further meeting with parents and the LSC is planned to take place shortly.
The parents of the learners at the College were informed in a letter from their local LSC in week commencing 17 October that the LSC had made a decision to terminate the contract for the provision of education and training with Belford College from 31 December 2005. The LSC's original intention was to
23 Nov 2005 : Column 2073W
give the College notice that the contract would terminate in February 2006. Following discussion with the College, the LSC agreed to the College's request to terminate the contract on 31 December 2005. The College have since requested that his date be varied and the LSC are considering this request.
The funding decision follows an Ofsted and Adult Learning Inspectorate inspection of Belford College in February 2004 when overall provision was judged to be inadequate. Since then Ofsted has undertaken a series of monitoring visits and an annual assessment visit to the college. The LSC is concerned about the rate of progress made by Belford College in addressing the weaknesses identified in the Inspection. In view of this, the LSC has made the difficult decision to terminate the College's contract.
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what assessment she has made of the provision of education about business and enterprise in schools in (a) 1997 and (b) the most recent year for which information is available; which schools offered such education in each year since 1997; what average number of hours of such education was offered to pupils of (i) primary, (ii) secondary and (iii) sixth form age groups in each year since 1997; what proportion of teachers received training in the delivery of such education in each year since 1997; and what the Government's target level of provision for such teaching is for (A) hours per week and (B) proportion of schools. 
Enterprise education is a key factor in improving future competitiveness. Following the Davies Review of 2002, in 2003 we launched Pathfinders involving 700 schools over two years, to develop the first national guidance on Enterprise Education. This was disseminated at 47 regional conferences between May and July 2005, attracting 67 per cent. of all secondary schools. Business and Enterprise Colleges came into the specialist schools programme for the first time in 2002, and in March 2005 there were 201 such specialist schools. We have allocated £60 million a year for the three academic years from September 2005 to support a new focus on enterprise education in all secondary schools.
John Hemming: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many children have been placed on the child protection registers by child protection committees as a result of an allegation of Munchhausen Syndrome by Proxy in each year since 2002; and how many of those children were taken into care. 
The Department for Education and Skills does not collect this information, as 'Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy' is not a recommended category for registration on child protection registers, nor is it a ground for the making of care orders under section 31 of the Children Act 1989.
23 Nov 2005 : Column 2074W
Jacqui Smith: The Department has made no assessment of the relationship between pupils' diet, behaviour and academic attainment. However, a healthy, balanced diet is a key factor in protecting health and promoting children's proper growth and development.
The Food Standards Agency has recently commissioned a review on diet and behaviour in school children that will scope the evidence base to assess the effect of nutrition, diet and dietary change on school children's learning and performance (i.e. on academic tests, behaviour, attendance and motivation). The final report is expected in April 2006.
Mr. Winnick: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills when she will reply to the letter of 10 October from the hon. Member for Walsall, North regarding a school in Walsall, North constituency. 
|Work Based Learning software (LSC)||3,127|
|Sure Start IT system (DfES)||1,707|
|ESF software (LSC)||1,391|
|Bulk furniture 200304 (DfES)||1,355|
|Bulk computers 200405 (DfES)||1,210|
|Bulk furniture 200102 (DfES)||1,160|
|Dual datacentre computer system, Moorfoot (DfES)||1,014|
|Bulk furniture 200001 (DfES)||958|
|Online systems software (LSC)||932|
|Dual datacentre computer system, London (DfES)||871|
|National College for School Leadership building (DfES)||25,660|
|Moorfoot, Sheffield building (DfES)||13,262|
|Castle View House, Runcorn building (DfES)||6,662|
|National office major structural fit out works (LSC)||5,340|
|Mowden Hall, Darlington building (DfES)||3,353|
|Culham Estate, Oxford building (DfES)||2,104|
|Caxton House, London capital expenditure on lease office 199899 (DfES)||1,396|
|Bircham training centre (CITB)||1,188|
|Greater Manchester major structural fit out works (LSC)||1,179|
|Moorfoot, Sheffield land (DfES)||1,171|
It is also departmental procurement policy to promote non-discriminatory competition and selection of contractors on criteria related to the economic benefits of the contract taking sustainability and diversity into account where appropriate.
(b) an economically most advantageous basis using a combination of whole life cost and quality to meet our requirements. The emphasis on whole life costs means that our purchasers take account of all aspects of cost, including running and disposal costs, as well as the initial purchase price.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|