Previous Section Index Home Page

29 Nov 2005 : Column 322W—continued

Cycling

Mr. George Howarth: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many times he has met representatives of the cycling community over the past
 
29 Nov 2005 : Column 323W
 
12 months; where these meetings took place; and if he will place copies of the minutes of these meetings in the Library. [26523]

Derek Twigg: Department for Transport Ministers have had a number of meetings with representatives of the cycling community over the last year, including several at Great Minster House with Phillip Darnton, the Chairman of Cycling England. Ministers have also made a number of visits around the country to cycling facilities and meetings with local cycling interests. Minutes of these meetings are for internal records only.

General Development Order 1995

Jim Cousins: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many Article 14 directions under the 1995 General Development Order have been served in each region of England in each year since 1999; and if he will list all such directions and their location in respect of the north-east region since 1 April 1999. [31573]

Dr. Ladyman [holding answer 24 November 2005]: An Article 14 direction is any type of response given by the Secretary of State for Transport to a planning application, be it refusal, conditions, advice, holding direction or consent.

The current database for monitoring Article 14 directions does not allow this type of information to be collated by region. Over England as a whole, the information requested is as follows for the last financial year:
2004–05
Planning application consultations received3,733
Directions of refusal79
Directions of conditions137
Directions of restrictions on grant of permission72




Note:
Data for earlier years are not available centrally.




A specific analysis of planning applications has been carried out for the Highways Agency's Maintenance Area 14 (which generally corresponds to the north-east region). This shows that over the period 18 August 2003 to 23 November 2005, there were 394 planning applications. Directions of refusal were given in five cases as follows. In each case the direction of refusal was given on road safety grounds:

The Department is currently improving existing monitoring systems so that a full regional analysis can be provided in future.
 
29 Nov 2005 : Column 324W
 

Greater Western Franchise

Mrs. May: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when the successful bidder for the new Greater Western Franchise will be announced. [32087]

Derek Twigg: The Department plans to announce the successful bidder for the Greater Western Franchise in December 2005.

Merseytram

Mr. George Howarth: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport (1) what assessment he has made of the level of contingency funding needed to underpin the construction of the Merseytram Line 1; and if he will place copies of the papers relating to that assessment in the Library; [25644]

(2) what assessment his Department has made of the contingency requirements for the construction costs of Merseytram Line 1; when these assessments were carried out; what the results of these assessments were; and if he will place copies in the Library. [26513]

Derek Twigg: Before giving the scheme provisional approval in 2002, the Department commissioned an audit of the project costs. No further audit has been undertaken since then.

The Department made it clear in December 2002 that our contribution was capped at £170 million. Any contingency for funding above this level was for the promoters to assess and to fund.

Merseytravel submitted a final bid for Merseytram Line 1 in November 2004, and further advised on the costs in May 2005. In considering Merseytravel's bid, the Department considered whether the scheme offered value for money, taking into account the total costs of the scheme, including an allowance for risk. For this purpose, the Department took Merseytravel's estimate of the cost of the scheme, including Merseytravel's proposed contingency provision and 6 per cent. optimism bias uplift. The Department considered that the 6 per cent. optimism bias uplift would probably be reasonable at the point of contract signing, but also considered the impact of a 15 per cent. uplift on the benefit cost ratio.

Following that consideration, the Secretary of State announced on 13 June that the Government would not increase its funding for the scheme, but that £170 million remained available if the scheme could be delivered for that cost. It has been for the promoters to consider what contingency funding they need in the light of that statement.

Mrs. Ellman: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what advice he has given to (a) Merseyside local authorities and (b) Merseytravel on the commitments they are required to make to enable the Merseytram project to proceed; and when this advice was given. [26249]

Derek Twigg [holding answer 8 November 2005]: Since the project was first approved, the Department has provided clear advice to the Merseyside authorities that
 
29 Nov 2005 : Column 325W
 
the Department's contribution to Merseytram was capped at £170 million. All costs above this level would have to be met from local sources and that appropriate assurances would be needed from authorities contributing to the costs of the scheme.

Motor Vehicle Accidents

Dr. Murrison: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many deaths from motor vehicle accidents on private land there were in each year for which records are available. [32322]

Dr. Ladyman: The information requested is not available.

Railways

Mr. George Howarth: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport when he will publish the consultation on draft guidance relating to the proposed new Railways Closures Procedures introduced by the Railways Act 2005; and when he expects those procedures to be in force. [27935]

Derek Twigg: We expect to consult on the closure guidance shortly. The guidance will come into force after the consultation and consideration of comments received is completed.

Rolling Stock

Mrs. Dunwoody: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many train sets were ordered from United Kingdom companies that assemble train sets in the United Kingdom in each year between 1994 and 2004; and what the projected number of orders for train sets from those companies is for each year between 2005 and 2010. [29030]


 
29 Nov 2005 : Column 326W
 

Derek Twigg: Bombardier is now the only manufacturer who builds/assembles train sets in the United Kingdom. Alstom previously built trains in the United Kingdom at Washwood Heath, Birmingham until it made a decision to close its facilities in the UK.

Following is the number of vehicles ordered since rail privatisation which were built or assembled in the UK.
Year of orderNumber of vehicles
Bombardier
199612
1997338
1998595
199933
2000121
2001257
2002876
200342
2004
Alstom
1997120
1998294
1999507

There are currently no orders placed with these companies for the period 2005 to 2010. However there will be a competitive procurement process for the replacement of high speed trains in due course.

Mrs. Dunwoody: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport how many (a) new and (b) old train sets were procured for the United Kingdom in each year between 1994 and 2004, broken down by nationality of provider; and what the estimated numbers are in each year between 2005 and 2010. [29031]

Derek Twigg: The following table sets out the number of new vehicles ordered since rail privatisation, up until 2005. We do not have information for 1994 or 1995.
Manufacturer nationality and order by vehicles each year

Bombardier (Canadian)—UK siteSiemens (German)Alstom (French)CAF/Siemens (Spanish/German)Hitachi (Japanese)
199612
1997338120
199859529448
199933507
20001218
2001257869
20021,0038
200342153
2004
2005168

There will be a replacement of high speed train's in due course, for which there will be a competitive procurement process.

Mrs. Dunwoody: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport if he will list the rolling stock manufacturers in the United Kingdom in each year between 1994 and 2004; and what the (a) location of production facilities, (b) number of orders and (c) number of employees was for each manufacturer for each year. [29032]

Derek Twigg: We do not have information for 1994 or 1995. The following table provides the information requested from 1996.
Number of orders by manufacturer and location of build

Bombardier (Canadian)(3)Siemens (German)(4)Alstom (French)(5)CAF/Siemens (Spanish/German)(6)
19961
199731
19981041
199932
200021
200132
200251
200311
2004


(3) Bombardier vehicles built or assembled in the UK (Derby) with the exception of 127 Meridians built in Brugge.
(4) Siemens vehicles are all being built in Germany/Austria site.
(5) Alstom build all their vehicles at Washwood Heath, Birmingham.
(6) These vehicles were built in Spain.



 
29 Nov 2005 : Column 327W
 

The number of staff employed by each manufacturer is a matter for those companies and is not recorded by the Department.


Next Section Index Home Page