Previous Section Index Home Page

20 Jan 2006 : Column 1695W—continued

Private Garden Development

Lynne Featherstone: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what estimate he has made of the (a) number and (b) total area of privately-owned gardens in each London borough that has been developed in each year since 1997; and if he will make a statement. [42951]

Yvette Cooper: The information requested is not held centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost. Land Use Change Statistics record the amounts of residential land developed but do not record whether it was privately owned or how much of the land was occupied by any garden.

Repossessions

Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many repossessions were made in each of the last 10 years in (a) England and (b) Tamworth constituency. [43463]

Yvette Cooper: Information on mortgage possessions is only available for the United Kingdom as a whole and is collected by the Council of Mortgage Lenders. The figures in the table include properties that are surrendered voluntarily.
Mortgages at end of periodProperties taken into possession
NumberNumber% all loans
199510,521,00049,4100.47
199610,637,00042,5600.40
199710,738,00032,7700.31
199810,821,00033,8700.31
199910,982,00029,9900.27
200011,173,00022,8700.20
200111,247,00018,2800.16
200211,364,00011,9700.11
200311,452,0007,8300.07
200411,512,0006,2300.05
2005 January-June
11,550,000
4,6400.04




Source:
Council of Mortgage Lenders



Right To Buy (Houghton and Washington)

Mr. Kemp: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister what proportion of the council housing stock of (a) houses and (b) flats has been sold under the Right to Buy scheme in Houghton and Washington East constituency since 1980. [42445]

Yvette Cooper: Information is not collected for the Houghton and Washington East constituency. The following relates to Sunderland city council.

An estimated 30 per cent. of the housing stock formerly owned by Sunderland city council was sold through the Right to Buy scheme between the introduction of the scheme in 1980 and the Large Scale Voluntary Transfer of the stock to Sunderland Housing Group in 2000–01.

Separate information on the number of flats sold through the Right to Buy scheme is not held centrally, and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
 
20 Jan 2006 : Column 1696W
 

Right to Buy (Kent)

Mr. Holloway: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many right-to-buy completions there were in (a) Gravesham and (b) Kent in each year since 1996–97. [43278]

Yvette Cooper: The number of Right to Buy sales in Gravesham and Kent can be found on the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's website at:

Right to Buy (Lincolnshire)

Shona McIsaac: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many council homes in (a) North East Lincolnshire and (b) North Lincolnshire were sold under the right-to-buy scheme in each year since its introduction; and what the average sale price was in each of those years. [42971]

Yvette Cooper: The number of council homes sold under the Right to Buy scheme and the average sale price per dwelling, as reported by North East Lincolnshire and North Lincolnshire for each available financial year is tabulated as follows.

Due to boundary changes it is not possible to supply data for years prior to those shown.

Financial year
Number of Right
to Buy sales
Average price net
of discount (£)
North East Lincolnshire UA
1996–974815,813
1997–987916,114
1998–997216,014
1999–20009016,189
2000–019116,231
2001–028615,291
2002–0317016,965
2003–0428920,931
2004–05n/an/a
North Lincolnshire UA
1996–97n/an/a
1997–98n/an/a
1998–9914316,077
1999–200015016,313
2000–0118816,723
2001–0218617,247
2002–0326818,403
2003–0426325,293
2004–0517136,953




n/a=not available
Source:
P1AB returns from local authority to ODPM



Vacant Domestic Properties

Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many vacant domestic properties there were in (a) England and (b) Tamworth constituency in each of the last five years, broken down by tenure. [43464]

Yvette Cooper: The following table contains the total number of vacant dwellings in England and in Tamworth, broken down by tenure for 2000 to 2004. This provides the latest available data:
 
20 Jan 2006 : Column 1697W
 

These figures include dwellings which have been empty for fewer than six months,
some of which for less than 1 month
Local
authority
Registered
social landlords
"Other"
public sector
Private sector(29)
(non-RSL)
Total(28)
Count date1 April31 March1 April(29)April/November
England
200087,20037,50012,600623,200760,500
200180,30039,30010,900622,600753,100
200278,10039,7009,000631,200758,100
200362,60044,9009,100633,300750,000
200457,50043,3007,400608,600716,800
Tamworth
200037110522570
200148110561620
200241160423480
20035070455512
200445317029499


(28) For the total tenure dwellings, Council Tax Base 1 Supplement CTB1(S) return is used. It is regarded as the most reliable source but it does not have the tenure breakdown. It has been collected from 2000 but is considered to be only reliable from 2002 onwards. Hence HSSA is used for 2000 and 2001 figures. CTB1(S) data are for a specified date in November, which is different from both the HSSA (1 April) and RSR (31 March). The total figure may not equal to the sum of individual tenures' figures if different sources were used or rounding has been applied. CTB1(S) data for 2005 are not yet available.
(29) For the private sector tenure figures, before 2002, 1 April figures from HSSA are used. For the years 2002 through to 2004, to obtain the number of private sector (non RSLs) vacant dwellings LA, RSL and "Other public sector" figures were subtracted from the total vacant dwellings figure from the council tax data. This residual method is considered to be better than the less reliable private sector figure supplied in the HSSA return. (In order to adopt the residual method, CTBl's November figure has been taken to represent the data at 1 April. This assumes that the effect caused by these different snap-shot dates is insignificant. This is considered reasonable as properties become vacant and re-occupied and vice versa all the time i.e. there is a balancing effect. Hence over such a small period of time there should be minimal difference in the overall numbers between the two dates. The minute difference between 1 April and 31 March (from RSR) can also simply be ignored.)
From April local authorities will have new powers to bring empty properties back into use.
Sources:
Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix (HSSA) return for LA and 'Other' public sector tenures
Regulatory Statistical Return (RSR) for RSL tenure
Council Tax Base 1 (CTB1) return for the total tenure figures (see footnote 1)




Mr. Kemp: To ask the Deputy Prime Minister how many vacant domestic properties there were in (a) England and (b) Houghton and Washington East constituency in each of the last five years, broken down by tenure. [42444]

Yvette Cooper: Figures on vacant dwellings at constituency level are not held centrally, but the Office
 
20 Jan 2006 : Column 1698W
 
of the Deputy Prime Minister does hold relevant local authority level figures.

The following table contains the total number of vacant dwellings in England and in Sunderland, broken down by tenure for 2000 to 2004. This provides the latest available data:
Local
authority
Registered
social landlords
"Other"
public sector
Private sector(30)
(non-RSL)
Total(31)
Count date1 April31 March1 April(30)April/November
England
200087,20037,50012,600623,200760,500
200180,30039,30010,900622,600753,100
200278,10039,7009,000631,200758,100
200362,60044,9009,100633,300750,000
200457,50043,3007,400608,600716,800
Sunderland
20001,10211602,5623,780
20010(32)1,00903,9254,934
2002099502,6333,628
200301,19802,9424,140
200401,43202,6824,114


(30) For the private sector tenure figures, before 2002, 1 April figures from HSSA are used. For the years 2002 through to 2004, to obtain the number of private sector (non-RSLs) vacant dwellings LA, RSL and "Other public sector" figures were subtracted from the total vacant dwellings figure from the council tax data. This residual method is considered to be better than the less reliable private sector figure supplied in the HSSA return. (In order to adopt the residual method, CTBl's November figure has been taken to represent the data at 1 April. This assumes that the effect caused by these different snap-shot dates is insignificant. This is considered reasonable as properties become vacant and re-occupied and vice versa all the time i.e. there is a balancing effect. Hence over such a small period of time there should be minimal difference in the overall numbers between the two dates. The minute difference between 1 April and 31 March (from RSR) can also simply be ignored.)
(31) For the total tenure dwellings, Council Tax Base 1 Supplement CTB1(S)) return is used. It is regarded as the most reliable source but it does not have the tenure breakdown. It has been collected from 2000 but is considered to be reliable only from 2002 onwards. Hence HSSA is used for 2000 and 2001 figures. CTB1(S) data are for a specified date in November, which is different from both the HSSA (1 April) and RSR (31 March). The total figure may not equal to the sum of individual tenures' figures if different sources were used or rounding has been applied. CTB1(S) data for 2005 are not yet available.
(32) This figure is based on HSSA return because the reported RSR value missed out the transferred stock from LA to RSL.
Notes:
1. These figures include dwellings which have been empty for fewer than six months, some of which for less than one month.
2. Figures as at 1 April unless otherwise stated.
Sources:
Housing Strategy Statistical Appendix (HSSA) return for LA and "Other" public sector tenures.
Regulatory Statistical Return (RSR) for RSL tenure.
Council Tax Base 1 (CTB1) return for the total tenure figures (see footnote 2).





 
20 Jan 2006 : Column 1699W
 

From April, local authorities will have new powers to bring empty properties back into use.


Next Section Index Home Page