|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Chris Ruane: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the net additional cost of operations in Iraq expressed as a percentage of (a) the total defence budget and (b) total government spending was in each year since 200203. 
The costs of specific conflict prevention activities (including security and peace-building tasks) are voted for separately by Parliament, through either the HM Treasury Reserve or the Conflict Prevention
6 Feb 2006 : Column 827W
Pools. As such, these funds do not form part of the Defence budget and cannot be expressed as a percentage of it.
|MOD budget (£ billion)||Cost of operations|
|Government total managed expenditure (£ billion)||Cost of operations in Iraq as percentage of Government TME|
In addition, there is a programme of visits to theatre by a consultant psychiatrist. These are undertaken primarily for clinical governance purposes, but the visiting consultant will also provide advice on particular patients as required.
If further advice or treatment is required that cannot be provided in theatre, the patient will be aero medically evacuated out of Iraq for treatment in the UK or at UK defence community mental health centres in Cyprus, Germany and Gibraltar.
Mr. Kemp: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 19 December 2005, Official Report, column 2342W, on Iraq/Afghanistan, what recent discussions he has had with the central criminal court of Iraq on the incident at Al Majarr Al Kabir on 24 June 2003. 
Mr. Ingram: We are continuing to offer all possible support to help bring the perpetrators to justice. A British liaison officer, stationed in Baghdad, provides assistance to the Central Criminal Court of Iraq as required. Progress is being made, but as this is an ongoing criminal investigation and outside British jurisdiction, it would not be appropriate to comment further.
Mark Hunter: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will make a statement on the progress of the bid made in July 2005 by BAE Systems for the next phase of the Nimrod project; and when a decision on the bid is likely to be made. 
Mark Hunter: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of the effect on the work force employed at Woodford of the delay in a decision on the bid for the next phase of the Nimrod project. 
Mr. Ingram: While the long term future of the Woodford site is a matter for BAE Systems, the MOD has funded further low risk production work on the Nimrod programme until the middle of this year. This will preserve the viability of the MRA4 project and the expertise of the work force until a decision is taken on full production.
Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the basis was for the decision to choose the Atomic Weapons Establishment to provide the warheads for the UK's nuclear deterrent; and if he will make a statement. 
John Reid: The Atomic Weapons Establishment is the sole repository for the UK's nuclear deterrent capability. The Government-owned facilities at Aldermaston and Burghfield were built for that purpose and remain a unique and essential national asset.
Pete Wishart: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost was of pension contributions incurred by (a) his Department, (b) each (i) non-departmental public body, (ii) executive agency and (iii) other public body for which he is responsible in (A) Scotland, (B) Wales, (C) each of the English regions and (D) Northern Ireland in each of the last three financial years; and what the planned expenditure is for 200506. 
Mr. Touhig: Pension contributions are disclosed at Note 2 within the published Departmental Resource Accounts. Copies of the Annual Report and Accounts for 200203 to 200405 have been placed in the Library of the House. The table details the total pension contributions incurred by the Department, for all personnel (military and civilian) for the years requested.
|Pension costs (£ million)|
The self accounting non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) fall outside the Departmental Boundary of the Departmental Resource Accounts. Pension contributions for employees of these organisations are disclosed as a Note to their published accounts. Copies of the published accounts have been placed in the Library.
|National Army Museum||Royal Air Force Museum||Fleet Air Arm Museum||Royal Marines Museum||Royal Navy Museum||Royal Navy Submarine Museum|
The Defence Executive Agencies established as Trading Funds fall outside the Departmental Boundary of the Departmental Resource Accounts. Pension contributions for employees of these organisations are disclosed as a Note to their published accounts. Copies
6 Feb 2006 : Column 830W
of the published accounts have been placed in the Library.
|UK Hydrographic Office||Met Office||Defence Science & Technology Laboratory||Defence Aviation Repair Agency||Army Base Repair Organisation|
The Oil and Pipeline Agency is a Public Corporation sponsored by the Department, which falls outside the Departmental Boundary of the Departmental Resource Accounts. Pension contributions for employees of this organisation are disclosed as a Note to the published accounts. Copies of the published accounts have been placed in the Library.
|Pension contribution (£)|
For 200506, employers' contributions for the majority of civilians are payable to the Principal Civil Service Pension Scheme (PCSPS) at one of four rates in the ranges 16.2 to 24.6 per cent. of pensionable pay, based on salary bands. The Scheme Actuary reviews employer contributions every four years following a full scheme valuation; last carried out as at 31 March 2003. The contribution rates reflect the cost of benefits as they accrue (net of employee contributions), not the costs as they are actually incurred, and reflect past experience of the scheme. Contributions are also payable to Teachers' Superannuation Scheme, NHS Superannuation Scheme and Defined Benefit Schemes for the Royal Navy Museum (9 per cent.) and the Royal Navy Submarine Museum (12.5 per cent.).
For Service personnel, employers' contributions are made to the Armed Forces Pension Scheme (AFPS) based on rates determined by the Government Actuary. The applicable rates for 200506 are 33.8 per cent. of pensionable pay for officers and 18.2 per cent. for other ranks.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|