Previous Section Index Home Page

13 Feb 2006 : Column 1731W—continued

Non-violent Offences

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what use is made of custodial remand for those charged with non-violent offences; and if he will make a statement. [49864]

Fiona Mactaggart: The decision on whether to grant bail or remand a defendant in custody is one for the courts to make, in each case, in line with the statutory framework primarily set out in the Bail Act 1976.

The court may withhold bail if it is satisfied that there are substantial grounds for believing that, if released on bail, the defendant would abscond, commit an offence, interfere with witnesses or otherwise obstruct the course of justice. The nature and seriousness of the alleged offence forms only part of the consideration of the court when making the decision whether to grant bail or remand in custody.

The court will also consider the weight of the evidence against the defendant, the defendant's character, antecedents, associations, community ties and past record of complying with bail, as well as any other factors which appear relevant.

Offences Against the Person Act

Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many people have been convicted under Section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 in each year since 1997; what their average sentence was in each year; and how many in each year were given a home detention curfew; [48875]

(2) how many people have been convicted of an offence under Section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 in each year since 1997; what their average sentence was; and how many in each year were given a home detention curfew. [48876]


 
13 Feb 2006 : Column 1732W
 

Fiona Mactaggart: The information requested is shown in the tables.
Persons found guilty of grievous bodily harm under sections 18(44) and 20(45) of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, England and Wales

Sec 18
(GBH with intent)
Sec 20 (GBH)
Number of persons found guiltyAverage custodial sentence length (months)Number of persons found guiltyAverage custodial sentence length (months)
19971,54444.14,58215.3
19981,46443.94,93315.1
19991,40245.84,60515.5
20001,35745.04,44315.6
20011,41348.04,39016.1
20021,52746.54,62917.0
20031,49750.34,50017.7
20041,69848.64,37317.7


(44) Wounding etc. with intent to do grievous bodily harm etc. or to resist apprehension.
(45) Wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm (inflicting grievous bodily injury with or without weapon).
Source:
RDS-NOMS 6 February 2006.



Number of prisoners serving sentences under sections 18 and 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 who were released on HOC between 1999–2005(46)

Grievous bodily harm (section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861)Grievous Bodily Harm, (intent) (section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861)
19991,14741
20001,22038
20011,20316
20021,48525
20031,56823
20041,32115
20051,31314


(46) Data as recorded on the Prison Service Inmate Information System.
Source:
RDS-NOMS 06/02/2006


Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people convicted under Section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 appealed against their sentences in each year since 1997; how many of them had their sentence reduced; and by what amount in each case. [48877]

Ms Harman: I have been asked to reply.

The following table shows the position at 2 February 2006.
Year receivedApproximate number of applications receivedApproximate number where sentence reduced(47)Number still awaiting resolution
199713018
199812031
199912619
200010123
200110326
20029815
200310217
2004152351
20051181627
Grand total1,05020128


(47) Includes all appeals where there was a reduction to any aspect of the sentence.


 
13 Feb 2006 : Column 1733W
 

The amount by which the above sentences were reduced is shown in the following table. The table does not identify those cases where the change was to an aspect of sentence other than imprisonment or where the tariff was reduced on a life sentence. Also, whilst all the cases involved a charge under s20, the change to sentence may not have related to that charge.
Trial sentence
Sentence after appeal
Year receivedYearsMonthsDaysYearsMonthsDays
1997600460
1997900760
1997700500
1997700560
1997600400
19771100800
1997600500
1997800600
1997500360
1997390300
1997600400
1997600400
1997460360
1977400260
1997700500
19971200800
1997800660
1997400300
1998600400
199820001200
199815001200
1998500400
1998700660
1998700660
199821001800
1998600400
1998160013100
19980600042
1998800500
1998700300
1998700500
1998400300
1998500360
19981000800
19981100900
1998500400
199814301200
1998560300
1998400360
1998600500
1998500260
19983600120
1998800700
1998500500
1998300300
1998500500
1998800600
1998260200
1998500400
19991000800
19992000180
1999600500
199912001000
1999500390
1999500360
1999700560
1999500030
1999700600
1999600360
1999600500
1999900700
1999400300
199912001000
1999600400
1999500400
1999Life00400
199912001000
1999490390
20000180060
2000700500
2000400300
2000400300
2000000000
2000800600
2000400300
20002000180
2000000000
2000800600
200013001000
200002000120
2000400300
2000000300
20002000180
2000900600
20001100900
2000600500
20001000800
20001000800
20001000800
20001000800
2000560300
20012400300
20012000180
20011000800
2001500400
2001800700
2001700600
2001700600
200112001000
2001000000
2001700600
2001360300
2001700500
2001300200
2001360260
2001600400
2001700320
2001900700
2001700460
2001600400
20013000120
2001000000
2001800500
200113601160
2001000000
2001460360
2001130090
2002400300
2002000000
2002400300
200212001000
2002400300
2002800600
20023000180
2002900900
200202700210
2002Life00600
20021000700
2002700500
200223002000
2002400200
2002700500
2003700500
2003200000
2003700500
200315001200
2003700500
200315001200
20031000700
2003600400
20031000800
2003390300
20031100600
2003700500
200312001000
2003560560
2003900600
2003660560
2003900700
2004400300
20043110360
2004400400
2004000000
20041000700
2004900760
2004500300
20041000760
2004800560
2004300300
20041000760
2004800700
2004900800
2004400300
2004400300
2004000000
2004600500
2004900800
20041200700
2004700600
2004300200
2004600500
2004700600
2004600500
2004600600
2004360360
2004600600
2004500400
2004800700
2004360300
20041000700
2004500360
20041200800
2004500500
200413001100
2005400300
2005Life—500Life—400
2005000000
2005800600
2005700500
2005500400
2005360330
2005600560
2005900700
2005800500
2005500400
200501800120
2005500400
20051100900
20053000270
2005900700

 
13 Feb 2006 : Column 1735W
 

Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people convicted under Section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
 
13 Feb 2006 : Column 1736W
 
appealed against their sentence in each year since 1997; how many of them had their sentence reduced; and by what amount in each case. [48878]

Ms Harman: I have been asked to reply.

The following table shows the position at 2 February 2006.
Year receivedApproximate number of applications received(48)Approximate number where sentence reduced(48)Number still awaiting resolution
199711921
199811127
199910230
200010121
20018612
20029630
20038017
200411123
2005852010
Grand Total89120110


(48) Includes all appeals where there was a reduction to any aspect of the sentence.

The amount by which the previous sentences were reduced is shown in the following table. The table does not identify those cases where the change was to an aspect of sentence other than imprisonment or where the tariff was reduced on a life sentence. Also, while all the cases involved a charge under s20, the change to sentence may not have related to that charge.
Trial sentence
Sentence after appeal
Year receivedYearsMonthsDaysYearsMonthsDays
1997400260
1997300200
1997800500
199702000120
1997500460
19971800120
1997860660
1997500450
19972000210
1997360300
1997300200
1997600500
199702100180
1997200160
1997190100
199702100150
199702000120
1997360000
1997360260
1997100000
1997600040
1998230220
1998500300
1998200000
199802100150
19982600180
19982000180
1998360260
19984000300
199803000120
1998090060
1998060060
1998100060
1998090090
1998200090
19980150090
1998400200
1998130000
1998100030
19982000180
1998360330
19981600120
1998400300
19980180090
1998300200
1998300200
1998300260
19981600120
199901800180
19990120060
19990180060
1999260200
1999600500
1999500400
19990150090
19992000180
19990160090
1999400300
19990160090
1999400300
1999090060
199901500120
1999260190
19990120060
19990120000
199901800120
1999080030
1999400200
19991600120
1999300200
19990120060
199902700180
19993000180
1999400400
1999300200
19990150030
19993000120
1999400300
2000300200
200001800120
2000300200
20002000140
20000300200
2000300200
2000500360
2000200130
2000300200
2000500400
200001800120
2000500400
2000400260
20002000180
2000600460
2000300200
20000120030
200001800120
2000360200
2000360200
200003000240
2001410260
2001260200
20010120060
2001400300
2001460260
20012000120
20010120060
20012600180
20013000180
2001800400
20010150090
20011900150
20024600210
20022600210
2002000000
2002300260
20020120080
20022000150
20020120080
20020120090
20023800180
2002090000
20022000140
2002300200
2002460360
2002300160
2002260200
200203000180
20020180060
20021600120
2002360200
2002460300
200202100150
20020180000
20022600120
20023000150
20020150090
2002400300
20020150090
20020180000
2002200000
2002500430
2003100040
20032600180
2003360260
2003400300
20032300120
2003390290
20033000180
20030200000
20030120060
20033000100
200303000150
20030400028
2003300300
20030180090
200301800100
2003200100
2003300200
2004500360
2004460300
20040180090
200401800100
2004400300
2004360260
20043000270
2004630430
20043000180
2004300200
200402100120
2004390200
200402700180
2004500360
20043402100
20040180090
2004400400
20042000150
2004090050
2004000000
2004400300
2004000000
2004000000
20052000180
2005400360
200501800120
20054003100
20050330200
200502700180
200511100180
20053000210
20050150060
2005200180
2005360260
2005360200
2005400330
2005600340
2005080000
2005300260
2005300200
2005360300
2005300200
20052600180

 
13 Feb 2006 : Column 1739W
 

Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many of those convicted under section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 since 1997 have reoffended within a year. [48879]

Fiona Mactaggart: The most recent reoffending data for adults were published in 'Reoffending of adults: results from the 2002 cohort' which is available through the Home Office's website (http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/index.htm).

The report shows the two-year reoffending rates of those offenders who start community penalties or who are discharged from prison in the first quarter of 2002. Further analysis of the 2000 data shows that 27 per cent. of offenders sentenced under section 18 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 reoffended within one year and were subsequently convicted. The corresponding figure for 2002 is 24 per cent. Reoffending data broken down by legislative act is not readily available for other years.


Next Section Index Home Page