|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Danny Alexander: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 19 January 2006, Official Report, column 1550W, on benefit, what information his Department does not hold which would be required to estimate the annual cost of raising all housing benefit and council tax benefit earned income disregards to levels commensurate with the real terms value of the disregards in 1988. 
The Department for Work and Pensions undertakes outward secondments to the private, voluntary and public sectors. The decision to
16 Feb 2006 : Column 2426W
consider this type of secondment falls directly to each of the Department's business areas and consideration of such secondment opportunities will be for the HR and Work Force Planning Directors of the Department and its agencies.
|Estimate of benefit|
|Pre-1998||No overall estimate available.||A few isolated reviews of fraud and error in individual benefits were carried out, but there was no systematic attempt to estimate the level of fraud across the whole benefit system.|
|1998||£2 billion to £7 billion||Published in the Green Paper, Beating Fraud is Everyone's Business". Around £2 billion was considered confirmed fraud, with the remaining £5billion coming from cases where there was a suspicion of fraud.|
|199899 to 200203||£2 billion per annum||A change in methodology in the ongoing measurement system meant that cases were investigated in more detail, and it was no longer appropriate to include cases where fraud was suspected in the headline estimates. Figure rounded to nearest £1.0billion.|
|200304 initial estimate||£1.5 billion||Figure rounded to nearest £0.5 billion.|
|200304 revised estimate||£1.0 billion||Figure rounded to nearest £0.1 billion. Development work to improve the quality of the estimate suggested that the original figure was an overstatement.|
|200405||£0.9 billion||Figure rounded to nearest £0.1 billion.|
It is not possible to provide a breakdown for Leicester due to the sampling methodologies used to produce fraud and error estimates. The sample sizes for individual areas are too small to produce meaningful results.
On 13 October 2005, the Department published our achievements in reducing levels of fraud in the benefit system and plans to reduce it further in 'Reducing fraud in the benefit system: Achievements and ambitions'. Copies are available in the Library.
Mrs. McGuire: Over the last five years, the Government have significantly extended and improved the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) 1995 which provides the basic legislative framework for civil rights for disabled people.
In October 2004, we significantly extended the employment provisions of the Act. These changes mean that the employment provisions now apply to small employers and all previously excluded forms of employment, except service in the armed forces.
They brought an additional 1 million employers and 7 million more jobs within the coverage of the Act. They also extended protection in a number of additional areas, such as outlawing discriminatory job advertisements and disability-related harassment.
From the same date, we introduced additional protection against disability discrimination in the provisions of goods, services and facilities. Service providers are now under a duty to take reasonable steps to remove, alter, or provide a reasonable means of avoiding, any physical features that make access to their services impossible or unreasonably difficult.
The passage of the Disability Discrimination Act 2005 fulfilled our commitment to provide comprehensive and enforceable civil rights for disabled people. The 2005 Act extended the protection of the 1995 Act to more people with HIV infection, cancer and multiple sclerosis and conferred important new rights in areas such as the use of transport, education, public authority functions, rented and leased premises and community participation. The 2005 Act also introduced a new duty on public authorities to promote equality of opportunity for disabled people. This Disability Equality Duty will apply to the public sector from December this year, and requires authorities ranging from local councils, police forces and health trusts to Government Departments to take the needs of disabled
16 Feb 2006 : Column 2428W
people into account when making decisions. Larger, more significant authorities must publish a Disability Equality Scheme by 4 December 2006 that sets out the steps the authority will take to implement the Disability Equality Duty.
Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what costs were incurred by his Department as a result of sending civil servants on overseas visits in each of the last 10 years. 
Mrs. McGuire: The Department for Work and Pensions was formed in June 2001 from the Department of Social Security and parts of the former Department for Education and Employment including the Employment Service. The available information is in the table. All travel complied with the requirements of the Civil Service Management Code.
|Cost of foreign travel (£)|
Sarah Teather: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many applicants have had the level of their council tax benefit payments affected by having savings over £3,000 in each year since 1999. 
Mr. Plaskitt: For council tax benefit, tariff income applies to all capital held above a prescribed limit. The prescribed limit was increased from £3,000 to £6,000 in April 2001. With the introduction of pension credit in October 2003, local authorities no longer record capital or tariff income amounts for council tax benefit claimants in receipt of pension credit, but rely on assessed income figures provided by the Pension Service.
|Number of recipients|
Andrew Gwynne: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many children in (a) Denton and Reddish constituency, (b) Tameside metropolitan borough and (c) Stockport metropolitan borough are (i) entitled to and (ii) receiving council tax benefit. 
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|