Previous Section Index Home Page

2 Mar 2006 : Column 882W—continued

South Africa

Dr. Francis: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development if he will make a statement on his Department's activities in South Africa. [53711]


 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 883W
 

Hilary Benn: DFID supports the Government of South Africa in three priority areas: growth, jobs and equity; HIV/AIDS and vulnerability; and governance, democracy and service delivery.

DFID's work on growth, jobs and equity helps to access poor people to South Africa's formal economy so that they can benefit from the resources which are already available (in areas such as land, and finance) but from which they are currently excluded. It also helps South Africa translate the growth in its economy into jobs. Secondly, work on HIV/AIDS and vulnerability helps South Africa to tackle its growing HIV/AIDS pandemic, through supporting a range of partners (National and Provincial Governments, civil society groups and the private sector) across a range of activities from prevention, through care, support and treatment to mitigating the impacts of HIV on communities and society. Following the crop failures and resulting hunger which hit Southern Africa in late 2002, and DFID's response of providing more than £150 million in food aid, DFID SA took on a new role of developing a longer term regional response to food insecurity in Southern Africa. Work on this, along with work on social protection issues, has been incorporated into our work on HIV/AIDS, under a broader vulnerability theme. Thirdly, DFID's work on governance, democracy and service delivery helps South Africa deliver quality public services in an equitable way to all citizens. A particular focus has been reform and capacity building of provincial and local government to strengthen their delivery of basic services, including education and health. Our bilateral budget for South Africa in 2006–07 is £23 million.

DFID is launching a Regional plan for Southern Africa on the 28 February 2006. The Regional plan will tackle cross boundary issues in growth, jobs and equity; resilient livelihoods; and peace/security. Examples of areas where DFID plans to support work under the Regional plan include trans-boundary water management; transport infrastructure; customs border posts; treatment and prevention of infectious diseases in the region.

Spending Review (Efficiency Targets)

Mrs. Villiers: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development what baseline figures he is using for assessing progress on his Department's targets to reduce (a) the total number of civil service posts by 170 and (b) the number of in country posts by 124; what progress has been made towards these targets to date; and what the total efficiency savings achieved to date are for these targets. [52938]

Hilary Benn: In December 2005 DFID agreed a revised Efficiency Technical Note which contains baseline figures for all its efficiency targets. The Technical Note is available to the public on DFID's website (http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/efficiency-technical-note.pdf).

The baseline figure for the total number of civil service posts was 1,780 in April 2004, and for in-country posts the baseline was 1,162 in April 2004. However there have been a number of subsequent definitional changes which have increased this initial baseline.
 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 884W
 

DFID remains on course to meet its home civil service target of 1,610 by March 2008 and its intermediate target for March 2006 of 1,820.

The reduction in our in-country posts to 950 by March 2008 has already been achieved.

These savings are part of DFID's overall administration cost efficiency gain which will amount to £20 million by the end of 2007–08.

Tsunami

Mr. Paterson: To ask the Secretary of State for International Development from which budget his Department's donation to the tsunami relief effort was taken. [54037]

Hilary Benn: Of the £75 million pledged, £20 million was drawn from DFID's crisis response budget, £30 million from DFID's general reserve, and a further £25 million from the Government's central reserve.

WORK AND PENSIONS

Carers (Housing Benefit)

Mr. Todd: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what provision is made for the accommodation needs of carers in housing benefit assessments. [32554]

Mr. Plaskitt: Housing benefit is paid to help meet the rental liability on the dwelling that the claimant occupies as their home. Housing benefit rules restrict the amount of rent for which help is available to reasonable levels, taking into account the size of the claimant's household. The determination of reasonable rent takes account of the individual needs and circumstances of the claimant and their household. In general, no account will be taken of those carers for whom the claimant's dwelling is not their home.

Child Support

Mr. Frank Field: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many child support cases on the CS2 system were assessed under a default maintenance decision in each year since 2003. [52729]

Mr. Plaskitt [holding answer 27 February 2006]: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive. He will write to the right hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:


 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 885W
 

Number of applications resulting in an initial default maintenance decision, per year

Number of calculations performedNumber of default maintenance decisionsDefault maintenance decisions as
a % of total calculations performed
200356,5004,0006
200497,0004,0004
2005119,5002,5002




Notes:
1. Since the new-scheme became operational in March 2003, information for 2003 covers the period of March-December. Data for 2004 and 2005 covers the full calendar year.
2. Figures are rounded to the nearest 500 and percentages to the nearest per cent.



Ben Chapman: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many (a) internal and (b) external legal advisers have been consulted by the Child Support Agency since August 2005 over the case of Mr. Edward Saul; what the total cost of this advice has been; and if he will make a statement. [53830]

Mr. Plaskitt: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Stephen Geraghty. He will write to the hon. Friend with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what plans he has for Child Support Agency staff numbers for the period 2005 to 2008; and if he will make a statement. [21857]

Mr. Plaskitt: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the Chief Executive, Mr. Stephen Geraghty. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:


 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 886W
 


Date as at 31 March:Planned CSA Staffing (FTE(16))
200611,371
200710,782
20089,590


(16) Full time equivalent (FTE) converts staff numbers to express the hours part-time staff are contracted to work as a proportion of full-time hours.


Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of applications were cleared by the Child Support Agency because (a) a maintenance calculation was made and a payment arrangement put in place, (b) good cause was established and (c) the parent with care was subject to a reduced benefit direction, in each quarter of the last five years for which information is available. [40484]

Mr. Plaskitt: The administration of the Child Support Agency is the matter for the chief executive. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:


 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 887W
 

Number and proportion of cases cleared by different methods in each quarter for the period July 2001 to March 2003 and April 2005 to June 2005

July to September 2001October to December 2001January to March 2002April to June 2002July to September 2002October to December 2002January to March 2003
Total clearances92,000112,000113,00096,000101,00087,00081,000
Of which:
Assessed24,00030,00031,00028,00028,00024,00022,000
Assessed (Percentage)26262829282827
RBD2,0002,0002,0002,0002,0001,0002,000
RBD (Percentage)2222222
Other66,00080,00080,00067,00072,00062,00058,000
Other (Percentage)71727170717171

April to June 2005July to September 2005October to December 2005
Total clearances86,00081,00088,000
Of which:
Old scheme9,0006,0005,000
New scheme77,00075,00084,000
Of which (new scheme only)
Calculation and collection schedule28,00029,00032,000
Calculation and collection schedule (Percentage)363938
RBD1,0001,0001,000
RBD (Percentage)212
Good Cause2,0001,0002,000
Good Cause (Percentage)222
Other46,00044,00049,000
Other (Percentage)605858




Notes:
1. An old scheme application is defined as cleared if the case is closed or a maintenance assessment has been carried out. In addition, an application is also counted as cleared if the parent with care (PWC) is identified as claiming good cause or the PWC is subject to a reduced benefit decision. This differs slightly to the definition of a new scheme clearance (see below) and figures from the two schemes will therefore only be broadly, and not directly, comparable.
2. A new scheme application is defined as cleared if the case is closed or a maintenance assessment has been carried out and a maintenance collection schedule set up. In addition, an application is also counted as cleared if the parent with care (PWC) is identified as claiming good cause, or the PWC is subject to a reduced benefit decision, or is identified as being a change of circumstance to an existing application, as opposed to a new one.
3. The figure for other" clearances on the old scheme (July 2001 to March 2003) includes those cases cleared because the PWC has been identified as claiming good cause, or the case has been closed, or the case has been cleared for any other reason. It is not possible to identify figures for good cause separately.
4. The figure for other" clearances on the new scheme (April to December 2005) includes those cases cleared because the case has been closed, or the application has been identified as a change of circumstance to an existing application.
5. Figures have been rounded to the nearest thousand, and percentages to the nearest 1 per cent. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.



Mr. Devine: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people were employed by the Child Support Agency in each year between 2000 and 2005. [44017]


 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 888W
 

Mr. Plaskitt: The administration of the Child Support Agency is a matter for the chief executive, Mr. Stephen Geraghty. He will write to the right hon. Friend with the information requested.

Letter from Stephen Geraghty:




Period
Full-time equivalent staff (Cabinet Office mandate methodology)Full-time equivalent staff (ONS methodology)
31 March:
20008,729
20019,555
200210,691
200311,256
200410,81911,037
20059,7849,985
31 December:
200510,46610,649




Notes:
1. Cabinet Office mandate methodology excludes staff on nil pay, maternity leave and staff on reduced pay due to sickness.
2. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) has introduced standard definitions for use in the calculation of all public sector employment statistics. In line with other public sector organisations DWP has now implemented the ONS definitions. The ONS definition includes staff previously excluded, e.g. staff on maternity leave.
3. Historical data using this definition is now available backdated to February 2004, the baseline for the Department's efficiency challenge.



Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions for what reason he has not published the review of the Child Support Agency undertaken by the chief executive and completed in December 2005. [50242]


 
2 Mar 2006 : Column 889W
 

Mr. Plaskitt: Last year the Agency chief executive, Stephen Geraghty, undertook a review of the Agency's operations. A summary of his findings have been made available on the Department's website.

The Secretary of State has announced a redesign of the child support system—to be led by Sir David Henshaw and an Operational Improvement Plan to improve the Agency's performance. Copies of the terms of reference and Operational Improvement Plan are in the Library and have been made available on the Department's website.


Next Section Index Home Page