Previous Section Index Home Page

10 Mar 2006 : Column 1788W—continued

Travel to School

Chris Grayling: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport what percentage of (a) primary and (b) secondary school children get to school by (i) walking, (ii) cycling, (iii) travelling by bus, (iv) travelling by car and (v) another method. [54989]

Ms Buck: Data from the National Travel Survey on the percentage of trips in 2004 made by children travelling to and from school by mode and age are given in the following table.
Trips to and from school by main mode, 2004, Great Britain
Percentage

ModeAge five to 10Age 11 to 16
Walk5044
Cycle13
Local/private bus729
Car/van4122
Other method13

DEFENCE

Lisbon Agenda

Keith Vaz: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what policies his Department has adopted to assist the United Kingdom's fulfilment of the Lisbon Agenda criteria. [55687]

John Reid: The Government strongly support the renewed Lisbon focus on "jobs and growth" as the best way to meet the challenges of globalisation and boost prosperity and living standards for all. The UK National Reform programme details the Government's policy response to these challenges. The Defence Industrial Strategy reflects our commitment to this. We expect the spring council in March to emphasise the importance of implementation of national commitments to reform.
 
10 Mar 2006 : Column 1789W
 

QinetiQ

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what factors influenced the decision to sell the initial stake in QinetiQ in 2002 to Carlyle, as opposed to other major bidders. [44180]

John Reid: A range of factors were taken into account in the assessment of the bids, but the main criterion was value for money for the taxpayer. Carlyle offered the best combination price and a low level of equity holding in the company, as well as offering a strategy for value creation that was consistent with the Ministry of Defence's overall objectives for the public private partnership.

Royal Air Force

Mr. Lancaster: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the (a) establishment and (b) actual strength is of the Royal Air Force, broken down by trade. [54882]

Mr. Touhig: The establishment and actual trained strength of the Royal Air Force by trade as at 1 January 2006 is given in the following table:
RAF TradeEstablishmentStrength
Eng Tech A2,7003,090
Eng Tech P1,4901,900
Eng Tech W2,0301,940
A Tech (M)1,7601,730
A Tech (AV)1,3001,590
Trade Group 19,28010,250
Eng Tech AV2,0502,150
Eng Tech AE1,1301,150
Trade Group 23,1703,290
CIS00
Eng Tech EL2,0602,140
TCC/TCO1,1601,180
CIS AL Erect130150
Trade Group 43,3503,470
Gen Tech E640610
Gen Tech GSE640640
Gen Tech WS160160
Gen Tech (M)140130
Trade Group 51,5901,540
MTD1,2601,230
MT Tech/Mech380390
Trade Group 61,6501,620
RAF Police1,5301,510
Gunner1,9601,790
Firefighter640600
Trade Group 84,1303,900
ATC1,4001,280
Trade Group 91,4001,280
RAF Admin00
RAF PTI520480
Trade Group 10520480
INT AN(C)280290
INT AN(V)220230
Trade Group 11500520
ASMOP/SNCO FC770760
Trade Group 12770760
SE FITT740740
PTR/FNR350340
Trade Group 131,0901,080
Photographer220290
INT AN(I)420400
Air Cart10090
Trade Group 14740780
Staff Nurse (RMN)2535
PH Tech2020
EH Tech3540
OT Tech3030
Radiog1015
Lab Tech1520
Med Admin360360
Med Asst340330
Staff Nurse (RGN)250280
Trade Group 151,1101,110
Dent Tech2020
Dent Hyg2525
Dent Admin/Nurse140150
Trade Group 16180190
Pers Admin1,9701,930
Data/Stat An00
Trade Group 171,9701,930
Supplier2,2202,170
Movs Cont/Op890920
Trade Group 183,1203,090
Chef640750
Cat Acct90120
Mess Mgr/Std540500
Trade Group 191,2601,370
Musician170150
Trade Group 21170150
Total36,00036,800




Notes:
1. All figures of 50 or more have been rounded to the nearest 10 with figures ending in five rounded to the nearest 20. Figures less than 50 have been rounded to the nearest five.
2. Totals and subtotals have been rounded after summing so may not appear to be the sum of their constituent parts.




 
10 Mar 2006 : Column 1790W
 

Spring

Sir Nicholas Winterton: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence whether the Meteorological Office has changed the date on which spring is recognised as beginning. [55751]

Mr. Touhig [holding answer 3 March 2006]: The Met Office has not changed the date on which the start of spring is commonly defined and widely recognised. The Met Office definition of spring, unchanged for at least 90 years, agrees with the current first listed Oxford Dictionary definition. This is based on vegetation changes through the year.

In meteorology the seasons are taken to be as follows: spring: March, April and May; summer: June, July and August; autumn: September, October and November; winter: December, January and February.
 
10 Mar 2006 : Column 1791W
 

UKHO

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what assessment he has made of potential conflicts of interest arising from the United Kingdom Hydrographic Office's (UKHO) acquisition of SevenCs, with regard to (a) the market share accruing to UKHO as a result of the acquisition and (b) the impact of the UKHO's commercial distribution of marine data products on its statutory role in safeguarding life at sea. [53043]

Mr. Touhig: The acquisition has had no noticeable effect on the UKHO's share of the market for data used in marine navigation. No additional share of that market has accrued to the UKHO as a result of the acquisition. Therefore no potential conflict of interest is perceived as arising from the acquisition.

The UKHO's commercial distribution of marine data products does not give rise to any conflict of interest in relation to safeguarding life at sea.

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 1 February 2006, Official Report, column 514W, on SevenCs, if he will make a statement on the relationship between the UK Hydrographic Office's obligations under the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea and its responsibility to ensure an open system. [53253]

Mr. Touhig: The UK's obligation under the convention is to make available data that meet the convention's carriage requirements, so enabling the mariner to comply with the regulations applicable to UK waters and to UK-flagged shipping. This is best achieved where open systems exist.

Mr. Harper: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence pursuant to the answer of 1 February 2006, Official Report, column 514W, on SevenCs, what is his assessment of what the barriers to an open market in the digital navigational industry were prior to the acquisition of SevenCs by the UK Hydrographic Office. [53254]


 
10 Mar 2006 : Column 1792W
 

Mr. Touhig: Prior to acquisition the route to market for digital navigational data was open, via the SevenCs software. The acquisition means that the UKHO can ensure that it remains so.

WORK AND PENSIONS

Child Poverty

Mr. Paul Goodman: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what percentage of children in poverty (a) whose parents were in work and (b) whose resident parent was in work lived in (i) lone parent households and (ii) non-lone parent households in each year for which figures are available. [43824]

Margaret Hodge: We recognise that work is the best way out of poverty for all families, including lone parent households. Our successful labour market policies have contributed to a lone parent employment rate of 56.6 per cent., a record high, up 11 percentage points since 1997.

The seventh annual 'Opportunity for all' report (Cm 6673) sets out the Government's strategy for tackling poverty and social exclusion and reports progress against a range of indicators. Significant progress has been made and since 1997 the number of children in relative low-income has fallen by 700,000 on an after housing costs basis and the number of children in workless households has fallen by 400,000. Detailed information about the number and proportion of children living in low income households is published in "Households Below Average Income 1994/95–2003/04", available in the Library.

Information is not available on the number and percentage of children whose parents are in work, because our data source does not collect sufficient information on non-resident parents.

The number and composition of children living in low-income households where (i) the resident parent was in work and lived in a lone-parent household or (ii) the resident parent was in work and lived in a couple household or (iii) where no resident parent works, for incomes reported on the before housing costs and after housing costs measures of income are contained in the following tables:
Table 1: Number and composition of children living in relative low income households, by household type. Before housing costs

(i) Children in lone parent
low-income households where
the resident parent works
(ii) Children in couple low-
income households where a
resident parent works
(iii) Children in low-income
households where no resident
parent works
Total children in
low income households
Number (million)PercentageNumber (million)PercentageNumber (million)PercentageNumber (million)Percentage
1996–973.2100
1997–980.271.3411.6523.1100
1998–990.271.3411.6523.1100
1999–20000.281.2411.5513.0100
2000–010.271.1401.4532.7100
2001–020.291.1411.3502.6100
2002–030.3101.0401.3502.6100
2003–040.281.1411.3512.6100









 
10 Mar 2006 : Column 1793W
 

Table 2: Number and composition of children living in relative low income households, by household type. After housing costs

(i) Children in lone parent
low-income households where
the resident parent works
(ii) Children in couple low-
income households where a
resident parent works
(iii) Children in low-income
households where no resident
parent works
Total children in
low income households
Number (million)PercentageNumber (million)PercentageNumber (million)PercentageNumber (million)Percentage
1996–974.2100
1997–980.381.6382.2534.1100
1998–990.4101.6382.1524.1100
1999–20000.4101.5382.1534.1100
2000–010.491.5392.0523.8100
2001–020.4111.4372.0523.7100
2002–030.4121.3371.8513.5100
2003–040.381.4391.8533.5100




Notes:
1. Relative low income here is defined using the below 60 per cent. of contemporary median low income threshold.
2. A parent-child relationship here is a parent-son/daughter relationship which includes adopted children. It excludes step-children and foster children.
3. A lone-parent household is defined here as one containing a single person with a dependent child (that is it includes households containing other individuals).
4. Full information on inter-household relationships is only available from 1997–98.
Source:
Family Resources Survey (FRS).





Next Section Index Home Page