Previous Section Index Home Page

19 Apr 2006 : Column 743W—continued

Obesity

Mr. Greg Knight: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the cost to the national health service of weight loss surgery was in each year since 1997; and if she will make a statement. [63605]

Caroline Flint: Information on the cost of delivering weight loss surgery is not collected centrally.

Public Interest Reports

Mr. Stephen O'Brien: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) at what point and by whom it is determined in relation to any NHS body that a public interest report needs to be (a) compiled, (b) issued and (c) published; [63864]

(2) how many public interest reports have been issued across all NHS bodies, broken down by strategic health authority, in (a) 2002–03, (b) 2003–04, (c) 2004–05 and (d) 2005–06; [63865]

(3) which NHS bodies have had relevant public interest reports issued in the current financial year 2005–06 and in relation to which NHS bodies consideration is being given to the issuance of a public interest report in 2006–07. [63866]

Mr. Byrne [holding answer 18 April 2006]: Auditors appointed by the Audit Commission to audit the accounts of national health service bodies have the
 
19 Apr 2006 : Column 744W
 
discretionary power under section 8 of the Audit Commission Act 1998 to issue a report in the public interest.

Section 8 of the Act requires auditors in auditing the accounts to consider whether, in the public interest, they should report on any matter coming to their notice in the course of the audit, in order for it to be considered by the body concerned or brought to the attention of the public. The auditor can issue an immediate report if the public interest requires it, or can issue a report at the conclusion of the audit.

The Audit Commission issued revised guidance in 2004 to auditors on the circumstances when a Public Interest Reports (PIR) might be issued. The guidance requires auditors to consult on the draft report with the body, other local stakeholders (including the strategic health authority (SHA)), and any other interested parties. The Department is also given the opportunity to comment on the draft report. However, the decisions as to whether a public interest report should be issued, what it should say and when it should be issued, are made by the auditor.

The number of PIRs issued under section eight of the Audit Commission Act 1998, from 2002–03 to 2005–06, is shown in the following table.
SHANumber of PIRs issued
2002–03
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire1
West Yorkshire1
2003–04
Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire1
2004–05
Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire1
North West London1
Surrey and Sussex1
West Yorkshire1
2005–06
Avon, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire4
Birmingham and the Black Country1
Cheshire and Merseyside1
County Durham and Tees Valley2
Greater Manchester1
Hampshire and the Isle of Wight3
Kent and Medway1
Norfolk, Suffolk and Cambridgeshire3
North and East Yorkshire and Northern
Lincolnshire
2
North West London4
Shropshire and Staffordshire1
South East London1
Surrey and Sussex2
Thames Valley1

In 2005–06, the following NHS bodies were issued with PIRs under section eight of the Audit Commission Act 1998:


 
19 Apr 2006 : Column 745W
 

In 2006–07, the following organisation was also issued with PIRs:

The following organisations have received draft reports and the auditors are considering when/whether to issue them:

St. Richard's Hospital

Mr. Tyrie: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the reasons for the deficit at St. Richard's hospital, Chichester; and if she will make a statement. [63957]

Caroline Flint: Strategic health authorities (SHAs) are responsible for managing the financial position for their local health communities, which includes assessing the reasons for organisations incurring deficits. SHAs are charged with ensuring that every organisation achieves financial balance.

Royal West Sussex national health service trust was forecasting, at month six, a deficit of £16.7 million for the financial year 2005–06.

In order to assist the NHS organisations that have the greatest financial problems, the Secretary of State announced turnaround teams in a written ministerial statement on 1 December 2005.

The first stage of this is a baseline assessment, the aim of which is to ensure there is an agreed understanding of the local financial problem and that actions are in hand to address this. In this assessment, Royal West Sussex NHS trust was rated as needing urgent intervention to drive turnaround. In conjunction with the SHA, the team is agreeing a tailored package of turnaround support with the organisation.
 
19 Apr 2006 : Column 746W
 

Turnaround Teams

Paul Farrelly: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) what the estimated cost is in the financial year ended 31 March (a) 2006 and (b) 2007 of the employment of turnaround teams and external accountancy and management advice for the 18 NHS trusts named in her announcement of 25 January 2006; [62889]

(2) what proportion of the estimated costs of the turnaround teams in the NHS in North Staffordshire will be borne by (a) the Department, (b) the Shropshire and Staffordshire strategic health authority and (c) the relevant NHS trusts; [62890]

(3) what the estimated costs are of the employment of turnaround teams in the NHS in (a) North Staffordshire and (b) the area of the Shropshire and Staffordshire strategic health authority. [62891]

Jane Kennedy: The turnaround teams were announced by the Secretary of State in a written ministerial statement on 1 December 2005, Official Report, column 35WS.

The first stage of this is a baseline assessment, the aim of which is to ensure there is an agreed understanding of the local financial problem and that actions are in hand to address this. University Hospitals of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, North Stoke primary care trust and Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust were included in the assessment. This was funded by the Department.

Following the assessment, the local NHS will identify the actions needed to return the organisations to financial balance and what tailored support is needed to support local management. The strategic health authority (SHA) provides advice and support to the procurement of support for the most challenged organisations, including University Hospitals of North Staffordshire NHS Trust and Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust. The costs of these are met locally but for each organisation, the Department has provided funding equivalent to the first three months of a turnaround director.

The Department has contracted for turnaround directors to work alongside the transition SHA leaders which in the case of Shropshire and Staffordshire, means across the West Midlands area.

The Department has a budget of £6 million for turnaround work in 2005–06 covering its work with all organisations in the turnaround cohort. The budget for 2006–07 has not yet been finalised.

The turnaround teams will be needed to the end of 2006–07, when it is expected that the NHS will have returned to financial balance.