|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Mr. Bone: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport what plans there are for the use of the facility being built in London for indoor and outdoor shooting activities after the 2012 Olympic Games has ended. 
Mr. Don Foster: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (1) what representations her Department has received from the (a) theatre, (b) film and (c) television industry regarding possible exemptions to the ban on smoking in public places for the purposes of artistic productions; and if she will make a statement; 
(2) what discussions her Department has had with the Secretary of State for Health regarding possible exemptions to the ban on smoking in public places for the purposes of (a) theatre, (b) film and (c) television productions; and if she will make a statement. 
Mr. Lammy: I have discussed smoking in public places for the purposes of artistic productions with the Theatrical Management Association/Society for London Theatre. I have received no other representations from the film, broadcasting and theatre industries and I have not discussed this particular point with my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Health.
However, my officials have been kept fully informed of the progress of discussions between the Department of Health, Equity and the Theatrical Management Association regarding possible exemptions from the workplace smoking ban.
Mr. Caborn: Financial support for sport from public sources is primarily channelled through Sport England and UK Sport, the two DCMS sponsored bodies which award Lottery grants and dispense Exchequer funds for sport from DCMS.
Since 1997, Sport England has awarded Exchequer funding of approximately £157,000 to South East London 1 boroughs. This is in addition to Lottery funding of £33.5 million 2 which Sport England has awarded to this area for the same period.
It is not possible for UK Sport to determine an amount of Lottery or Exchequer funding allocated to South East London as its funding is not directed to
26 Apr 2006 : Column 1135W
specific regions. However, UK Sport has identified 18 athletes with a declared address in South East London who have benefited from Lottery funded Athlete Personal Awards of approximately £487,000 3 .
1 For the purposes of this question, Sport England has included funding awarded to the London boroughs of Bexley, Bromley, Greenwich, Lambeth, Lewisham and Southwark in its definition of South East London.
2 This figure includes Lottery awards of approximately £25 million made through programmes such as: Community Capital, Community Investment Fund, Active Communities Development Fund, Active Sports, Active England, Community Athletics Refurbishment Programme, Sport Action Zones and Green Spaces. This also includes mixed Lottery and Exchequer awards of approximately £8.5 million made through programmes such as: School Sports Partnerships and Space for Sport and Arts.
Mr. Carswell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what measures exist to deal with asylum seekers who leave the UK under the voluntary return scheme but return to the UK subsequently. 
Ms Keeble: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what steps he plans to take concerning the problems with the use of restraint and isolation in secure training centres identified in the Carlile Report. 
Andy Burnham: Decisions relating to the costs involved in commissioning the Forensic Science Service to carry out a scientific examination of evidence in a criminal investigation are made by individual police forces, who have responsibility for determining the levels of spending appropriate to each investigation.
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department in how many cases in which proceedings are complete the Forensic Science Service has (a) lost and (b) misinterpreted evidence since 2000; and how many cases were not proceeded with as a result. 
Andy Burnham: The Forensic Science Service (FSS) has reviewed its records and has not identified any completed cases since 2000, in which evidence was lost or misinterpreted. Differences in opinion can arise between expert witnesses providing evidence, based on their interpretation of the information available. The FSS has identified two cases within this time period where timeliness of the identification of evidence could have been improved. Decisions as to whether cases are proceeded with are made by individual police forces and the Crown Prosecution Service.
These young prisoners were female and held in female prisons, in accommodation specially set aside for juveniles on young offender wings. Under 17 year old girls are no longer placed within the Prison Service estate, unless exceptional circumstances apply in an individual case; and four dedicated units, within the Prison Service estate, have now been created for 17 year old girls; a fifth is due to open later this year.
John Bercow: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans he has to build medium-secure units within the prison infrastructure to provide support for prisoners who have mental health concerns. 
Mr. Andrew Turner:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much time is allowed for meetings between inmates and their families, including
26 Apr 2006 : Column 1137W
children, in (a) men's and (b) women's prisons; and to what extent arrangements for such visits differ between the two types of prison. 
Fiona Mactaggart [holding answer 24 April 2006]: The statutory allowance for visits is the same for both men and women and is audited. For convicted prisoners, the statutory minimum is one hour. In exceptional circumstances, the establishment can apply for a temporary reduction to 30 minutes. For unconvicted prisoners, the minimum is one and a half hours a week where the establishment offers visits on a daily basis, or a minimum of one hour in prisons where visits are allowed three days a week as opposed to daily. Visiting arrangements are administered locally at the discretion of governors and directors, taking into account operational requirements. The actual duration of visits is not recorded centrally.
Many prisons offer more than the prescribed minima and the length of the visit may also be linked to the incentives and earned privileges scheme, which is managed by each establishment. An increasing number of establishments also offer extended family or children's visits, typically lasting a half or full day, as well as focussed visits which are structured around the needs of the child and imprisoned parent.
Fiona Mactaggart: An electronic case management system enabling both the prisons and probations services to share information in real time (C-NOMIS) will be introduced in July 2006 and rolled out across the services over a period of 24 months.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|