Previous Section Index Home Page

8 Jun 2006 : Column 798W—continued


Lodge road roundabout Average daily flow

Ballymoney Road(2)

8,250

Sandleford Bridge(2)

13,840

Ballycastle Road(2)

10,480

Lodge Road

No information available

Rugby Avenue

No information available

Total

32,570

(2)These figures relate to the 2004 Census.

Valuation and Lands Agency

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland what Geographical Information System data is used by the Valuation and Lands Agency’s domestic rates Automated Valuation Model. [70595]

Mr. Hanson: Valuation and Lands Agency’s CAMA (Computer Assisted Mass Appraisal) system uses the following Geographic Information System data:

Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Biomass Industry

Mr. Letwin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs which recommendations made in the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution’s report of May 2004 on biomass the Government has implemented. [22205]


8 Jun 2006 : Column 799W

David Miliband: The Government’s response to the report was published in October 2004 and set out the measures that were in place at that time, or were being developed to address the issues raised in the recommendations. Copies of the Government's response have been placed in the House Library. Significant developments have since taken place on a number of issues relevant to the report:

Carbon Management Programmes

Miss Kirkbride: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when the list of change management and other consultants undertaking carbon management programmes will be opened up to other consultants. [67846]

Ian Pearson: The Carbon Management Programme has been developed by the Carbon Trust. As the Trust is a private company, the management of contracts is a matter for its Board. Officials from the Carbon Trust will contact the hon. Member direct about this.

Children's Services

Mr. Kemp: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many nursery and creche places are provided for people working in his Department; what charges are made for the provision of such services; and what other facilities are provided for the children of employees of her Department [67362]

Barry Gardiner: DEFRA is committed to childcare support both for the benefit of its staff but also as an essential element of addressing the Departmental business need DEFRA's childcare provision set out in the following table.

DEFRA employees are able to use a salary sacrifice scheme to reduce their childcare costs by up to £243 per month.


8 Jun 2006 : Column 801W

8 Jun 2006 : Column 802W
Defra childcare provision and costings 2005-06
Full-time placement costs
Childcare type/Location Places To users Subsidy rates Cost to Defra 2005-06 (forecast)

Defra Workplace Nurseries

York

44

£326 1(st) child

£204 1(st) child

£83,568

£372 siblings monthly

£158 siblings monthly

Guildford

40

£241-£398 monthly dependent on grade

£154-£312 monthly dependent on grade

£55,463

Subsidised places in external nurseries

London

11

Costs vary dependent on nursery location

£60 per week

£42,182

Bristol

3

Costs vary dependent on nursery location

£60 per week

£7,773

Discounted fees in external nurseries

Newcastle London

Dependant on demand

7 per cent. discount in chain of nurseries

£0

£0

London

Dependant on demand

10 per cent. discount in chain of over 44 nurseries

£0

£0

Holiday Playschemes

London

Dependant on demand

£16.33 daily

£8.67

£1,483

Guildford

Dependant on demand

£12.60 daily

£3.15-£16.90 dependent on number of children

(1)£1,676

York

Dependant on demand

£12.47 1(st) child

£5.61 1(st) child

(1)£1,179

£11.22 sibling

£6.23 sibling

(1 )February Playscheme 2006 costs estimated

Departmental Staff

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what promotion boards have been held in his Department in each of the last five years. [70543]

Barry Gardiner: Most posts in DEFRA are filled on the basis of individual advertisements, in-house, across the civil service or as open competition, based on a competence-based selection process. The aim is to obtain precise and verifiable information about when candidates have displayed the particular behaviours and expertise at the level required for the vacancy. There have only been two general promotion boards, in 2003 and in 2004, to fill a number of vacancies and projected vacancies in the senior civil service. Selection was also through a generic competence-based process, supported by psychometric and cognitive tests, a presentation and final panel interview.

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many non-pensionable bonuses were awarded to members of his staff in each of the last three years; and at what total cost. [73100]

Barry Gardiner: DEFRA changed its payroll provider in November 2004. It would be disproportionate cost to report on the archived data prior to 2005-06.

During the period 1 April 2005-31 March 2006, Defra paid 4362 non-pensionable bonuses at a cost of £3,356,845.67. This equates to 1.25 per cent. of the 2005-06 pay bill.

These figures, taken from the DEFRA payroll also include agency staff in the: Pesticides Safety Directorate, State Veterinary Service, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Marine Fisheries Agency and Government Decontamination Service.

David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many staff in his Department did not achieve an acceptable mark in their annual report in each of the last three years; and what percentage this represented of the total number of staff in each case. [75107]

Barry Gardiner: For 2003-04 17 staff (0.27 per cent.), and in 2004-05 18 staff (0.28 per cent.) were assessed as unacceptable. The 2005-06 annual appraisal exercise is on going.

These figures are for staff in core DEFRA, the Pesticides Safety Directorate, State Veterinary Service, Veterinary Medicines Directorate, Marine Fisheries Agency and Government Decontamination Service.

Flooding

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans he has to help areas which may suffer flooding in the next 12 months. [75569]

Ian Pearson: The Government invest significant sums of money each year to reduce the risk of flooding. Total central and local government funding for flood and coastal erosion risk management has nearly doubled from £307 million in 1996-97 to around £600 million in 2005-06.

Local authorities and the emergency services have contingency plans in place to cope with a range of incidents in their areas, including flooding. The Environment Agency (EA) also maintains its own local, regional and national level flood contingency plans. At the national level, DEFRA is the lead role for flood emergencies within Government, and our Lead Department Plan sets out the co-ordination arrangements needed at all levels.

The Government have set up a regional resilience team in each of the English regions to enhance the co-ordination of planning for wide impact events, such as major flooding, and to improve lines of communication between central Government and local response teams if a serious incident does occur. The EA, with other stakeholders, also carries out a regular programme of exercises to test its capability at all levels. This included a national level exercise in 2004, Exercise Triton.

Post-flooding, the recovery effort would be led by local authorities. Where they have incurred excessive expenditure as a consequence of a disaster or emergency they may be able to apply to the Department for Communities and Local Government for exceptional funding under the Bellwin Scheme.

Fox Hunting

Daniel Kawczynski: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the impact on rural communities of the ban on fox hunting; and if he will consider the merits of repealing the ban. [74769]

Barry Gardiner: The Government have no plans to repeal the Hunting Act 2004. Since the ban came into effect, evidence has shown that hunts are continuing to meet and ride within the law and that the dire consequences for rural communities predicted by opponents of the Act have not materialised.


8 Jun 2006 : Column 803W

Rural Development Programme

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what matched funding will be raised in 2006-07 to permit the rural development programme in England to be adequately funded; [74872]

(2) what steps he is taking to match fund modulation for farmers. [75046]

Barry Gardiner: During 2006, the England rural development programme will continue to be funded by EU rural development money from the European agricultural guidance and guarantee fund (EAGGF) and by transfers from Pillar 1 direct payments through voluntary modulation. Receipts from both of these funding sources will continue to be co-financed on an equal basis by the UK Exchequer and the EU.

From 1 January 2007, a new rural development programming period will commence with slightly different rules. The EAGGF will be replaced by a new fund called the European agricultural fund for rural development (EAFRD). This will include funds transferred from the 5 per cent. compulsory modulation applied in the old EU-15 member states. Any money from this fund must be co-financed by the national exchequer. This will normally involve equal funding by the Exchequer and the EU, although new rules allow this to be set at a ratio of 45 per cent. exchequer funding to 55 per cent. EU funding for some schemes.

The December 2005 EU budget summit agreed that from 2007, member states could decide at what level to match-fund any receipts from voluntary modulation. However, final decisions have yet to be taken about the levels of voluntary modulation and co-financing which will apply during the period 2007-13.


Next Section Index Home Page