Previous Section Index Home Page

13 Jun 2006 : Column 1063W—continued


13 Jun 2006 : Column 1064W

Supermarkets

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether his Department will give evidence to the forthcoming Competition Commission inquiry into the impact of supermarkets on market towns and out-of-town superstores in rural areas. [74503]

Barry Gardiner: I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given on 18 May 2006, Official Report, column 1129.

My noble Friend Lord Rooker, the Minister for Sustainable Farming and Food has since written to the Competition Commission to highlight a number of areas which the Commission may wish to consider as part of its investigation. In doing so, he confirmed that the Department is willing to provide the Commission with any assistance or information it may request. A copy has been placed in the House Library and on Defra’s website.

Waste Facility (Wrexham)

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will make a statement on the closure of the agricultural waste collection facility near Wrexham. [76045]

Mr. Bradshaw: I understand the facility which was approved for the collection of fallen stock was closed on 26 May when council officers inspected the plant after members of the public raised health concerns over the number of dead carcases on site.

The local authority and state veterinary service is now working with the facility to clear the backlog of carcases with a view to reinstating the approval of the site to begin receiving fallen stock again as soon as possible. In the mean time farmers in the area have been given a choice of alternative collectors and a good fallen stock collection service remains available to them under the National Fallen Stock Scheme.

Waste Management

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the effect of increased incineration of waste on the environment. [75568]

Mr. Bradshaw: Defra published the independent Review of the Environmental and Health Effects of Waste Management, in 2004, which was peer reviewed by the Royal Society. The review concluded that, based on the evidence from studies so far, the treatment of municipal solid waste—including by incineration—has, at most, a minor impact on human health and the environment. Defra has also recently published a study, “Impact of Energy from Waste and Recycling Policy on UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions”, in support of a review of the Government's waste strategy. This is available on the Defra website:

9 per cent. of waste is currently incinerated in England, but an increase is likely to be needed to be able to meet landfill directive targets, despite big improvements in waste recycling and minimisation. Recovering energy from waste through incineration produces many fewer
13 Jun 2006 : Column 1065W
greenhouse gas emissions than landfilling. Deriving energy from biodegradable waste also helps to offset fossil fuel generation.

The Environment Agency ensures that emissions and other outputs from waste management facilities are within the limits set by the EU and the UK Government to minimise any negative impact. Incinerators are also required to conform to tighter emission standards than other types of combustion plants.

Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what percentage of the UK's waste was (a) recycled and (b) sent to landfill in the last period for which figures are available. [75574]

Mr. Bradshaw: In 2002-03, the estimated proportion of controlled waste which was landfilled in the UK was 43 per cent. In the same year, the estimated proportion which was recycled or reused was 42 per cent.

This encompasses waste collected from household, industrial, commercial, construction and demolition sources.

Whaling

Bill Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what estimate he has made of the number of whales killed for scientific research in each year since the international moratorium on commercial whaling was introduced, broken down by species. [77385]

Mr. Bradshaw: Up to 2005 the number of whales taken each year, by species and by country for scientific whaling (since the moratorium was introduced in 1986) are shown in the following table as reported to the International Whaling Commission.


13 Jun 2006 : Column 1066W

13 Jun 2006 : Column 1067W
Country Species taken Number

1986

Iceland

Fin

76

Sei

40

Rep. of Korea

Minke

69

1987

Iceland

Fin

80

Sei

20

1987-88

Japan

Minke

273

1988

Iceland

Fin

68

Sei

10

Norway

Minke

29

1988-89

Japan

Minke (inc. 5 dwarf)

241

1989

Iceland

Fin

68

Norway

Minke

17

Japan

Minke (inc. 3 dwarf and 1 lost)

330

1990

Norway

Minke

5

1990-91

Japan

Minke (inc. 4 dwarf)

327

1991-92

Japan

Minke

288

1992

Norway

Minke (inc. 3 lost)

95

1992-93

Japan

Minke (inc. 3 dwarf)

330

1993

Norway

Minke

69

1993-94

Japan

Minke

330

1994

Norway

Minke

74

Japan

Minke

21

1994-95

Japan

Minke

330

1995

Japan

Minke

100

1995-96

Japan

Minke

440

1996

Japan

Minke

77

1996-97

Japan

Minke

440

1997

Japan

Minke

100

1997-98

Japan

Minke

438

1998

Japan

Minke

100

1998-99

Japan

Minke

389

1999

Japan

Minke

100

1999-2000

Japan

Minke

439

2000

Japan

Minke

40

Bryde's

43

Sperm

5

2000-01

Japan

Minke

440

2001

Japan

Minke

100

Bryde's

50

Sperm

8

Sei (in error)

1

2001-02

Japan

Minke

440

2002

Japan

Minke

102

Bryde's

50

Sei

40

Sperm

5

Minke

50

2002-03

Japan

Minke (inc. 1 lost)

441

2003

Iceland

Minke (inc. 1 lost)

37

Japan

Minke (inc. 1 lost)

101

Bryde's

50

Sei

50

Sperm

10

Minke

50

2003-04

Japan

Minke (inc. 3 lost)

443

2004

Iceland

Minke

25

Japan

Minke

100

Bryde's (inc. 1 lost)

51

Sei

100

Sperm

3

(inc. 1 lost)

60

2004-05

Japan

Minke (inc. 1 lost)

441


Next Section Index Home Page