| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
13 Jun 2006 : Column 1146W—continued
| Waverley local authority district | ||||
| Basic employability training | Longer occupational training | Short job focused training | Self employment | |
| Notes: 1. Figures are rounded to nearest 10. 2. Data on programme completers are not available, data on programme leavers, which includes people who did not complete the programme, are shown in the tables. 3. Jobcentre Plus became responsible for the delivery of Work Based Learning for Adults from April 2001. Source: DWP, Information Division Work Based Learning for Adults Evaluation database. | ||||
Anne Milton: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what funding has been available for work based learning for adults schemes in (a) Surrey, (b) Guildford and (c) Waverley in each financial year since 1997; and what funding is projected for 2005-06. [66167]
Mr. Jim Murphy: Information on programme spend and projected spend is not available broken down by parliamentary constituency, local authority or county council.
Information on expenditure on work based learning is available at Jobcentre Plus district level for the last three years. The figures for the Surrey and Sussex district, which includes Surrey, Guildford and Waverly, are in the table.
| Expenditure on work based learning for adults Surrey and Sussex Jobcentre Plus district | |
| £ | |
| Work based learning for adults | |
Health
Abortions
Mr. Laurence Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the cost to the NHS of carrying out abortions (a) in the UK and (b) in Gloucestershire was in each of the last 10 years for which figures are available. [74163]
Caroline Flint: The available information is set out in the following tables.
The cost to the national health service of carrying out abortions in England is shown in table one. For NHS providers data for the period prior to 1997-98 are not held centrally. For non-NHS providers, data for the period prior to 2002-03 are not held centrally. These data do not include personal medical services pilots.
Table two shows the cost to the NHS of carrying out abortions in NHS providers in Gloucestershire. Data are not collected on a geographical basis and the data provided cover the following organisations:
Cotswold and Vale Primary Care Trust (PCT);
Cheltenham and Tewkesbury PCT;
West Gloucestershire PCT; and
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
Equivalent data prior to 2002-03 are not available due to organisation reconfiguration.
No data were submitted for non-NHS providers by these organisations.
| Table 1: National schedule of reference costs—Cost of termination of pregnancy | ||
| £ | ||
| NHS providers | Non-NHS providers | |
| Notes: 1. NHS providers data based on returns from NHS trusts, foundation trusts and PCTs in England. 2. Non-NHS providers data based on returns from NHS trusts, foundation trusts and PCTs in England for activity they contract out to / directly commission from non-NHS providers. 3. For non-NHS providers collections prior to 2003, this information was not collected separately. It would have been reported in part in the NHS trust own data return. 4. Data also relate to activity carried out for admitted patients (does not include outpatients) and exclude excess bed days. 5. We do not distinguish between trimesters in the above, therefore the above will be an average of all. 6. Figures include market forces factor (MFF). Sources: NHS providers: National schedule of reference costs 1998. Appendix 4 of National schedule of reference costs 1999 to 2005. Non-NHS providers: Appendix 5 of National schedule of reference costs 2003 to 2005. | ||
| Table 2: NHS providers in Gloucestershire: cost of termination of pregnancy | |
| Total cost (£) | |
| Notes: 1. Data based on returns from appropriate NHS trusts and PCTs, including Cotswold and Vale PCT, Cheltenham and Tewkesbury PCT, West Gloucestershire PCT and Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. 2. Data also relate to activity carried out for admitted patients (does not include outpatients), and exclude excess bed days. 3. We do not distinguish between trimesters in the above, therefore the above will be an average of all. 4. Figures include MFF. Sources: NHS providers: National schedule of reference costs 1998 to 2005. | |
Alcohol-related Diseases
Mr. Evennett: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many people were admitted to hospital with alcohol-related diseases in Greater London in (a) 2002-03, (b) 2003-04 and (c) 2004-05. [75750]
Mr. Ivan Lewis: Data on the counts of finished consultant episodes (FCEs) and patients where there was a primary diagnosis for selected alcohol-related diseases by London Strategic Health Authority (SHA) for the years 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05 are shown in the table.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |