Previous Section Index Home Page

21 Jun 2006 : Column 1917W—continued


Mr. Davidson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many individuals from EU accession states have been found to be fraudulently claiming (a) jobseeker's allowance and (b) housing benefit since accession. [77603]

Mr. Plaskitt: The information is not available. The Department does not maintain a record of benefit offences by nationality.

Bereavement Allowance

Mr. Graham Stuart: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will take steps to increase the number of men receiving bereavement allowance; and if he will make a statement. [76753]

Mr. Plaskitt: We keep under review the way in which information is made available about benefits so that bereaved people, at this very difficult time in their lives, know about their possible right to benefit and can act on it at the right time.

As well as traditional sources of information we are working in partnership with funeral directors, registrars and voluntary groups such as Cruse, the National Association of Widows and Citizens Advice Bureaux who may be contacted by bereaved people. In addition we will continue to look for opportunities across Government and their services as they develop, to improve advice about this particular benefit, to those most in need of it—the newly bereaved.

Carers

Stephen Hesford: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what (a) benefits and (b) other assistance are offered by his Department to those who act as carers for (i) ill and (ii) disabled relatives in Wirral, West. [71636]

Mrs. McGuire: The administration of carer's allowance is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Disability and Carers Service, Mr. Terry Moran. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.

Letter from Martyn Craske:


21 Jun 2006 : Column 1918W
Appendix: Recipients of carer's related benefits in the Westminster parliamentary constituency of Wirral, West, November 2005
Benefit Claimants

Carer's Allowance

690

Carer's Additional Amount paid with Pension Credit

320

Carer's Premium with income- related benefits:

Income Support

320

Income based Jobseeker's Allowance

Definition and convention
"—" nil or negligible.
Notes:
1. Carer's allowance: Total shows the number of people in receipt of an allowance, and excludes people with entitlement where the payment has been suspended, for example if they are in hospital.
2. Pension credit: Pension credit was introduced on 6 October 2003 and replaced minimum income guarantee (income support for people aged 60 or over).
3. Parliamentary constituencies are allocated by matching postcodes against the relevant ONS Postcode Directory.
4. A smaller number of former MIG cases did not convert to pension credit on 6 October 2003. These cases have been excluded from the figures and are mainly cases where the claimant is aged under 60 and the partner over 60.
5. IS, PC and CA figures are taken from 100 per cent. WPLS data and are rounded to the nearest 10.
6. JSA (IB) figure is derived by applying 5 per cent. proportions to 100 per cent. WPLS data and are therefore subject to a degree of sampling variation.
7. November 2005 is the latest published data available.
Source:
DWP Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study (WPLS).
Information Directorate, 5 per cent. samples.

HB/CTB recipients with a carer premium in the North West Government Office Region
May 2004 (Thousand)

Housing Benefit

24

Council Tax Benefit

32

Notes:
1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest thousand.
2. HB/CTB data refer to households and may be a single person or a couple.
3. HB figures exclude any extended payment cases.
4. CTB figures exclude any single adult rebate cases.
5. The figures are based on a 1 per cent. sample and are therefore subject to a degree of sampling variation.
6. May 2004 are the latest data available.
7. The lowest level the figures can be broken down to is GOR, therefore figures have been provided for North West Government Office Region.
Source:
Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit Management Information System, Annual 1 per cent. sample, taken in May 2004.

21 Jun 2006 : Column 1919W

Child Support Agency

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) what his latest estimate is of the cost to his Department of Sir David Henshaw’s review of the Child Support Agency, broken down by (a) travel costs, (b) salary costs for Sir David Henshaw, (c) other staff costs, (d) telephone costs and (e) other costs; and if he will make a statement; [75762]

(2) whom Sir David Henshaw has interviewed to date for his review of the future of the Child Support Agency; [75763]

(3) by what date he plans to make a statement on the future of the Child Support Agency; and if he will make a statement. [75764]

Mr. Plaskitt: The redesign of child support is ongoing. Sir David Henshaw will deliver his findings to my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions before the summer recess. It is the intention to publish Sir David Henshaw’s report when a statement is made to the House.

The Henshaw redesign’s estimated total costs between February 2006 and July 2006 will be as follows:

Estimated cost (£)

Sir David Henshaw’s:

Time

54,000

Redesign secretariat staffing

200,000

Redesign non-staff costs and publication

up to 75,000

Redesign research/consultation

50,000

Note:
Figures are rounded to the nearest £1,000.

The DWP also meets the costs of general office overheads such as accommodation and IT. These costs are not separately identifiable from DWP running costs.

Information on costs to this Department are not yet available. The redesign secretariat is staffed by employees from the Department for Work and Pensions and the Cabinet Office and the costs detailed are an estimate of the direct costs of Sir David Henshaw and his team for both Departments.

Sir David Henshaw’s report will contain the details of the costs incurred by this Department and representations made to him.

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many of the cases agreed under the old Child Support Agency system have been varied; and at what cost. [75810]

Mr. Plaskitt: The information requested is not available.

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to his Department’s press release of 26 September 2005, why the gateway service for help with the resolution of potential Child Support Agency cases has not been established to date; and what representations he has received on this issue. [77088]

Mr. Plaskitt: The extent to which mediators could be used to secure agreement between the parents on the
21 Jun 2006 : Column 1920W
subject of child support maintenance is clearly an area to be considered by Sir David Henshaw in his redesign. He is looking at initiatives across Government, including those in the Department for Constitutional Affairs and the Department for Education and Skills, with the aim of identifying scope for closer working so that all Government interventions will ensure parents both take financial responsibility for their children and reach agreements that reflect the best interests of their children.

Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how much he estimates the Henshaw Review of the Child Support Agency will cost. [76556]

Mr. Plaskitt [holding answer 13 June 2006]: The Henshaw redesign’s estimated total costs between February 2006 and July 2006 will be as follows:

Estimated cost (£)

Sir David Henshaw’s:

Time

54,000

Redesign secretariat staffing

200,000

Redesign non-staff costs and publication

up to 75,000

Redesign research/ consultation

50,000

Note:
Figures are rounded to the nearest £1000.

The DWP also meets the costs of general office overheads such as accommodation and IT. These costs are not separately identifiable from DWP running costs.

Error Task Force

Mr. Ruffley: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people have worked in the Error Task Force in each year since it was introduced, broken down by civil service grade; what targets have been set for the Task Force; when it is expected to report to Ministers; and whether its report will be published. [73446]

Mr. Plaskitt: The Official Error Task Force was set up in January 2006 with the aim of reducing official error in income support, jobseekers allowance and pension credit during 2006-07. It meets monthly with membership representing key policy and operational areas.

Information regarding the number of people who have participated in the Official Error Task Force broken down by civil service grade is in the table.

Official Error Task Force
Civil service grade Full-time/part-time Number of staff

SCS

Part-time

4

UG6

Part-time

2

UG7

Part-time

4

SEO

Full-time

1

HEO

Full-time

1


21 Jun 2006 : Column 1921W

The Task Force is also working with a number of people to implement its improvement activities. It reports directly to the Permanent Secretary. Progress reports are provided to Ministers on a regular basis.

The first set of official error estimates covering the period of the Task Force is due to be published in summer 2007.

European Social Fund

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will place in the Library the information given to me under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 regarding how much companies, contracting bodies and local authorities received in
21 Jun 2006 : Column 1922W
each of the last five years from the European Social Fund. [76523]

Mr. Plaskitt: The information has been placed in the Library.

Family Credit

Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what the take-up rates were for family credit for each year of its existence; and if he will make a statement. [78410]

Mr. Plaskitt: The available information is in the following table.

Estimates of take-up for family credit
Percentage
Caseload take-up rate Expenditure take-up rate

1988 and 1989

57

67

1990 and 1991

62

66

1991 and 1992

66

73

1993-94

71

81

1994-95

69

82

1995-96

70

83

1996-97

71 to 75

82 to 88

1997-98

67 to 70

75 to 81

1998-99

66 to 70

73 to 79

Notes:
1. Caseload take-up compares the number of benefit recipients, averaged over the year, with the number who would be receiving if everyone took up their entitlement.
2. Expenditure take-up compares the total amount of benefit received, in the course of the year, with the total amount that would be received if everyone took up their entitlement for the full period of their entitlement.
3. The estimates exclude the full-time self-employed, and cover private households only.
4. Estimates for 1988 to 1992 are sourced from the Family Expenditure Survey, and cover calendar years. These years have been combined due to small sample sizes in each of the years.
5. Estimates for 1998 and 1999 are based on the calendar year 1989 and April to December 1988.
6. Family credit was replaced with working families tax credit in October 1999; take-up statistics for the period April 1999 to October 1999 were not published.
7. Due to small samples sizes on the FES for family credit, estimates are open to a significant margin of error.
8. The source for estimates for 1993-94 to 1998-99 is the Family Resources Survey, and covers financial years.
9. Estimates up until 1995-96 were presented as point estimates. Thereafter, estimates were presented as ranges as the point estimate was adjusted to take account of sampling variation. Estimates were not adjusted to take account of possible bias, so the Department is less confident that the true level of take-up lies within the ranges given, than it is for other benefits.
10. Estimates were published in "Income Related Benefits Estimates of Take-up" series. Copies are available in the Library.

Next Section Index Home Page