|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Charles Hendry: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many websites there are within his responsibilities; and what the total cost of maintaining such websites was in the last year for which figures are available. 
Mr. Byrne: As of 19 June 2006, the Home Office operates 41 websites. This does not include approximately 20 non-departmental public body (NDPB) sites, which are affiliated with, but independent of the Home Office. The core Home Office website also has a number of sub-domains, such as police.homeoffice.gov.uk, which act as portal sites for practitioners around policy issues. The Home Office does not keep a central record of costs for all departmental websites, and would not be able to collect this information without incurring disproportionate cost.
The records held by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) identify the number of defendants proceeded against for offences of domestic violence, but provide no information on other offences committed by the same defendants. This information could only be obtained by locating and examining every relevant file in each CPS office, which would involve disproportionate costs (Code of Practice on access to Government information, part 2, clause 9).
Margaret Moran: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department for which other crimes domestic violence perpetrators have been (a) investigated, (b) charged and (c) sentenced in the last five years. 
Mr. McNulty: The Home Office does not routinely keep this type of data centrally. However, a study conducted in 2005-06, using data from by the Offender Management system (OASys), found that there was a correlation between offenders who were physically violent towards their partner and a wide range of other offences. The table lists the types of co-related offences that were identified by the study.
|Offence category by domestic violence indicators|
|Offence involved physical violence towards partner||Other evidence of domestic violence||All other offenders|
|Current offence category||Number||Percentage||Number||Percentage||Number||Percentage|
Joan Ryan: Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, as amended, the police may take, without consent, fingerprints from all persons, including juveniles, who have been arrested for, informed they will be reported for or charged with a recordable offence and detained in a police station. The police may also take fingerprints from persons convicted of a recordable offence. Fingerprints which have been lawfully taken may be retained whether or not the person is charged with an offence or subsequently acquitted.
Mr. Baron: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) whether Tawanda Machingura, a Zimbabwean foreign national imprisoned for sexual assault of a vulnerable patient, has been deported; 
Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many letters of complaint were received by his Department relating to the Immigration and Nationality Directorate where the individual writing normally resides in (a) Peterborough constituency and (b) Peterborough city council area in each year since 1997. 
Mr. Byrne: Details of complaints received from June 2005 to May 2006 where the complainant (either an organisation or individual) has given a Peterborough postcode in the reply address are presented in the table.
PE8 is not included as no complaints have been recorded from addresses with that postcode.
Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many of the IT projects costing over £1 million in use in his Department and introduced since 1997 have been scrutinised by the Public Accounts Committee; and if he will list them. 
Mr. Byrne: I am advised that the IT projects costing over £1 million in use in the Home Department that were introduced since 1997 and have been scrutinised by the Public Accounts Committee are in the following table:
|Date||PAC hearing title|
The impact of the Office of Government Commerces initiative on the delivery of major IT-enabled projects (Home Office, including the IND Case Information Database Enhancement Programme as a subset case study, and HMPS were witnesses).
Mark Durkan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland on the possibility of establishing MI5s handling of threat information on the Omagh bombing prior to 15 August 1998. 
Mr. McNulty: There have been no discussions for the reasons set out by my hon. Friend the Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Mr. Woodward) in his answer of 2 May 2006, Official Report, column 1490W, with reference to the chief constables statement of 1 March 2006.
Mr. Streeter: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what lessons have been learned by his Department from Operation Reproof in Devon and Cornwall; and if he will make a statement. 
Mr. McNulty [holding answer 5 June 2006]: The investigation into Operation Reproof was undertaken under the supervision of the former Police Complaints Authority and the recommendations were passed to the chief officer for consideration. The chief officer is responsible for the day to day management of the force and use of its resources. I will ensure that the chief constable receives a copy of the question and replies to the hon. Member directly. Copies of the letter containing the response from Devon and Cornwall police will be placed in the House Libraries.
Bill Wiggin: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department when he will provide a substantive reply to Question 69968, tabled by the hon. Member for Leominster for named day answer on 11 May; and what the reason was for the time taken to reply. 
Sandra Gidley: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) what estimate he has made of the potential change in the number of civilian posts resulting from (a) a Hampshire, Dorset and Wiltshire combined police force, (b) a Hampshire and Thames Valley combined police force and (c) a Hampshire, Sussex and Surrey combined police force; 
(2) what estimate he has made of the potential start-up costs of (a) a Hampshire, Dorset and Wiltshire combined police force, (b) a Hampshire and Thames Valley combined police force, (c) a Hampshire, Sussex and Surrey combined police force and (d) one stand-alone Hampshire force; 
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|