| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Jubilee River, Berkshire
Adam Afriyie: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent representations the Environment Agency has received about Jubilee River in Berkshire; and what recent assessment he has made of the appropriateness of the design adopted by the Jubilee River designers. [78490]
Ian Pearson: The major representations that the Environment Agency have received over the last few months have come from two groups—Community Support Group South and Thames Awash.
A great deal of work has been carried out to assess the current standard of protection offered by the Jubilee River, as well as the Maidenhead, Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme (MWEFAS) as a whole, which the Agency accepts is below that expected when the scheme was designed.
Currently MWEFAS offers protection up to a flow of 420 m(3)/s (82 per cent. of the original scheme design capacity). Final works are being carried out this summer, which will further increase the capacity of the scheme (to 450 m(3)/s (87 per cent. of the original scheme design capacity).
Parliamentary Ombudsman
Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will list those occasions when the recommendations of a report from the parliamentary ombudsman were (a) rejected and (b) partly rejected by his Department since 1997. [76258]
Barry Gardiner: Neither the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) nor its predecessors have collated figures on the number of occasions where they have refused or omitted to give effect to the recommendations of the parliamentary ombudsman. While a definitive reply could be provided only at disproportionate cost, there is no immediate evidence available that suggests that we have rejected any recommendation from the parliamentary ombudsman since 2001 when Defra was established.
Payment Schemes
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what quality control checks are in place for the administration of the single payment scheme; and what steps he has taken to satisfy himself that these are (a) sufficiently sound to ensure the proper disbursement of public funds and (b) sufficiently robust to meet EU scrutiny standards. [76602]
Barry Gardiner: The Rural Payments Agency is responsible for the administration of the single payment scheme. There is a framework of quality checks in place and they are undertaken at various stages during the processing cycle. For the 2005 scheme year checks were undertaken on data capture, primary and detailed validation processes. There were also authorisation checks following completion of validation. In addition the computer system was designed with internal quality checks to ensure both the proper disbursement of public funds and to meet the EU scrutiny standards.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the (a) highest and (b) lowest Single Payment Scheme individual payment has been made to date; and whether these payments were correct. [76603]
Barry Gardiner: The highest and lowest Single Payment Scheme (SPS) payment made up to and including 8 June are:
| £ | |
These payment were correct based on information provided by the claimant and were calculated in accordance with the SPS EU regulation.
The £0.01 payments are at the extreme end of where penalties apply on a sliding scale if, for example, people over claim on their land entitlements. A number of calculations are made to the entitlement value of a claim, for example 95 per cent. on entitlement value,5 per cent. for modulation and the final payable figure, at a low value in instances of high penalties, is subject to rounding.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether, under Single Payment Scheme arrangements, farmers with common grazing rights are being notified of their individual share of commons allocation to enable them to check (a) the methodology and accuracy of the apportionment between the various right-holders and (b) the validity of the single payments made to them. [76604]
Barry Gardiner: Farmers are being notified of the hectarage of the common land which has been allocated to them based on the rights which they hold for the common. The calculation method is detailed on pages 14 and 15 of the 2005 SPS handbook and guidance. The vast majority of claimants making use of common land in support of their claim have now received a payment.
Mr. McLoughlin: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs when the Department will reply to the letters of (a) 22 March and (b) 21 April 2006 from the hon. Member for West Derbyshire on representations from the National Farmers Union in respect of the single farm payment scheme. [72630]
Barry Gardiner: The problems facing the Rural Payments Agency (RPA) in getting payments out to farmers has resulted in Ministers receiving over 350 letters from MPs relating to their constituents' problems caused by non-receipt of SPS payments.
Changing policy developments, including most notably the change from 15 to 31 May in respect of the date for penalties for late 2006 applications and the introduction of partial payments, have led to regrettable delays in responding.
Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many farmers in England are awaiting payments under the single farm payment scheme. [76031]
Barry Gardiner: The total number of single payment scheme customers is approximately 120,000. As at14 June 2006, 15,000 customers had not received either a full or partial payment.
Mr. Paice: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what assessment he has made of the impact of delays in the Single Payment Scheme on levels of stress among farmers. [79580]
Barry Gardiner [holding answer 22 June 2006]: There has been no specific assessment of stress among farmers arising out of the timing of payments under the Single Payment Scheme. However, the Government do recognise that some farmers will have faced cash-flow problems and other hardships due to the timing of these payments. As such, an extra £115,000 in funding was made available to a number of key rural support organisations who deal with such issues.
Rural Payments Agency (Job Objectives)
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what job objectives were set for the former Chief Executive of the Rural Payments Agency for (a) 2003-04, (b) 2004-05 and (c) 2005-06; and to what extent they were achieved. [73216]
Barry Gardiner: The job objectives set for the former Chief Executive of the RPA in 2003-04, 2004-05 and 2005-06 mirrored the targets set for the Agency in the business plans for each of those years and reported on for 2003-04 and 2004-05 in the published annual report with accounts. The Library of the House possesses copies of all these documents.
Each year the performance against targets of each of the Defra executive agencies is audited by Defra Internal Audit Division and the annual accounts are signed off by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Assessment of chief executives' performance takes place once these checks have been carried out.
In the light of these checks, the assessment for 2003-04 was that the RPA CE had achieved 91.6 per cent. of his objectives and the assessment for 2004-05 was that RPA CE had achieved 100 per cent. of his objectives. The checks for 2005-06 have not yet been completed.
Rutland Water
Mr. Hollobone: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent discussions his Department has had with (a) Anglian Water and (b) Rutland county council on expanding water supply from Rutland Water. [79240]
Ian Pearson: No recent discussions have been held between my Department and Anglian Water on this issue, although I understand that discussions were held between the then Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and officials from this company during 2005.
School Canteens
Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what support the Department is making available to allow farmers to launch initiatives to supply school canteens direct. [76071]
Barry Gardiner: My Department, under the Public Sector Food Procurement Initiative (PSFPI), is continuing to help the nine English Government offices for the regions to fund workshops for buyers and suppliers and projects to develop the supply side. This is increasing opportunities for small local farmers and growers to tender to supply food to schools and other public bodies, either directly or through primary suppliers such as contract caterers, wholesalers and other intermediaries.
My Department is also seeking to work with the School Food Trust which is supporting schools, local authorities, school cooks and catering providers to ensure that food in schools meets the Government's new standards. My Department will also shortly be publishing a guide to help farmers and growers understand how to supply the public sector—a market worth £2 billion a year. This will supplement the advice currently on the PSFPI website, which includes case studies and reports on some of the regional projects already undertaken (http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/sustain/procurement/index.htm).
Special Protection Areas
Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs whether a regulatory impact assessment will be published in relation to mitigation guidance for special protection areas. [78239]
Barry Gardiner: There are no plans to issue UK guidance on mitigation in relation to special protection areas. However, the European Commission is currently preparing guidance on the payment of compensation for all Natura 2000 sites, including special protection areas. Although this will not directly address the question of mitigation, it will make clear what kind of mitigation measures must have been attempted before compensation can become payable.
It is not normally necessary to publish a regulatory impact assessment when preparing guidance on existing legislation. However, we would certainly do so should it be necessary to amend the legislation on special protection areas for any reason.
Staff Absenteeism
Danny Alexander: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many working days have been lost to the Department and its executive agencies in each year since 1997 due to staff absenteeism, expressed as the average annual number of absent days per employee; and what the estimated cost to the Department and its agencies of absenteeism was in each year. [77754]
Barry Gardiner [holding answer 19 June 2006]: Defra was created in June 2001, and the answer given relates to period since then.
The most significant cause of staff absence is sickness. The average number of working days lost per employee due to sickness absence in full calendar years since the creation of Defra is shown in the following table.
| Department/agency | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 |
Data on sickness absences for 2005 is not yet available.
The estimated total cost of sickness absence for Defra and its agencies each year is as follows:
| Cost (£) | |
These figures represent the average salary costs for the number of working days lost.
The average number of working days lost per employee due to industrial action since 2001 is shown in the following table.
| Department/agency | 2001 | 2004 | 2005 |
The figure given for 2001 covers Defra and the agencies. Individual figures for the agencies are not available. There were no days lost to industrial action in 2002 or 2003.
Estimated cost figures for industrial action are not applicable since pay is stopped for the period of absence.
Staff Development
David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the total cost was of (a) staff away days and (b) staff team building exercises in his Department in each of the last three years. [69096]
Barry Gardiner: Each business area within the core Department holds its own devolved learning and development budget which it uses to fund locally arranged training for its staff, including staff away days and team building exercises.
The costs of locally funded staff away days and teambuilding events in each of the last three calendar years were:
| £ | |||
| Away days | Teambuilding events | Totals | |
Sustainable Timber
Joan Walley: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs if he will reconsider his response to the Environmental Audit Committee's Second Report of Session 2005-06 on sustainable timber; and if he will make a statement. [76597]
Barry Gardiner: The Government's response to the Environmental Audit Committee Report on sustainable timber, as published on 4 May 2006 (HC 1078), acknowledges that more should be done to facilitate sustainable forestry both domestically and internationally. Further measures to strengthen the Government's commitment to sustainable and productive forests will be developed in the near future and the Government will write to the Environmental Audit Committee about these measures in due course.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |