Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
4 July 2006 : Column 958Wcontinued
Charles Hendry: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government how many websites there are within her responsibilities; and what the total cost of maintaining such websites was in the last year for which figures are available. [79061]
Angela E. Smith: The websites operated by the Department for Communities and Local Government are as listed:
www.communities.gov.uk
www.neighbourhood.gov.uk
www.firekills.gov.uk (fire safety campaigns)
www.bvpi.gov.uk (best value performance indicators)
www.frsonline.fire.gov.uk
www.spkweb.org.uk (supporting people programme)
http://www.gos.gov.uk/national/ (Government office for the regions)
www.localegov.gov.uk
www.homeinformationpacks.gov.uk
www.info4local.gov.uk
www.togetherwecan.info
www.xoq83.dial.pipex.com (local government pension scheme)
www.renewal.net
www.cleanersafergreener.gov.uk
www.iggi.gov.uk (intra governmental geographic information)
www.planningportal.gov.uk
www.futureleadership.gov.uk
www.spdirectory.org.uk (supporting people directory of services)
www.nlud.org.uk (national land use directory)
www.firesafetytoolbox.org.uk
www.firelink.org.uk
www.localvisionforum.net
www.bmespark.org.uk (black minority ethnic supporting people)
www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk
The annual cost of maintaining the listed websites is £2,396,972. 90 per cent. of this cost comes from DCLG's six major websites, primarily the award-winning Planning Portal, which provides online planning applications services integrated into local authorities:
Website | Annual cost (£) |
Mark Tami: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what guidance her Department has issued to local authorities on the building of new properties in close proximity to electric pylons. [71583]
Meg Munn: The Government have not issued guidance concerning the building of new properties near pylons.
However, following the publication of the (then) National Radiological Protection Board's new Electromagnetic Field guidelines in March 2004, and the associated advice to Government, the Government are giving further consideration to taking the issue of building near power lines and pylons and is consulting with all the relevant stakeholder groups.
Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what estimate the Government have made of the impact of revised health guidance on overhead power lines on (a) the planning process, (b) house prices, (c) compulsory purchase orders and (d) power line burial in new housing developments; and if she will make a statement. [70599]
Meg Munn: The Government are considering the implications of Health Protection Agency advice regarding power lines with all stakeholders. Implications for the areas outlined in the question will be fully considered in deciding how to implement the advice.
When appropriate policy options have been formulated the Government will undertake a consultation on the options in the normal manner.
Fiona Mactaggart: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government which local authority areas have made representations to her about the accuracy of (a) the internal migration statistics and (b) the mid-year population estimates. [81983]
Mr. Woolas: The information is as follows.
(a) Since 5 December 2005, in the context of the local government finance settlement, we have received representations about the accuracy of the internal migration statistics used in the mid-year population estimates from Barking and Dagenham, Brent, Hounslow, Lambeth, Newham and Slough.
(b) Since 5 December 2005, in the context of the local government finance settlement, we have received representations about the accuracy of the mid-year population estimates from Barking and Dagenham, Brent, Enfield, Hounslow, Lambeth, Leeds, Lewisham, Newham, North Tyneside, Slough, Southwark, Telford and the Wrekin.
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government what the expenditure of the South East England Development Agency has been in each year since its inception in (a) each county and (b) each district in the south east, (i) in total, (ii) per capita and (iii) as a percentage of its budget. [82603]
Angela E. Smith: The information requested could be provided only at disproportionate cost.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Prime Minister what (a) approval for and (b) instructions relating to additional expenditure on replacing the UK's existing nuclear deterrent he has given to (i) the Ministry of Defence and (ii) HM Treasury since April 2005; and if he will make a statement. [81682]
The Prime Minister:
I refer the hon. Member to the answers I gave the right hon. Member for Witney (Mr. Cameron) at Prime Minister's Questions on 28 June 2006, Official Report, columns 253-4.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Prime Minister whether he gave prior approval for the reference to replacing the UK's nuclear deterrent in the Chancellor of the Exchequer's Mansion House speech; and if he will make a statement. [81683]
The Prime Minister: I have regular meetings and discussions with ministerial colleagues and others on a wide range of subjects. Information relating to internal meetings, discussion and advice is not disclosed as to do so could harm the frankness and candour of internal discussion.
Mr. Laws: To ask the Prime Minister what discussions (a) he and (b) staff at 10 Downing Street have had with (i) President Bush and (ii) White House staff since April 2005 about sustaining the UK's nuclear deterrent; and if he will make a statement. [81684]
The Prime Minister: It is not the practice of the Government to make public details of all discussions with foreign Governments.
Andrew Rosindell: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what recent discussions he has had with carers organisations about carers needs. [76781]
Mrs. McGuire: I last met representatives of Carers UK on 15 February and discussed a range of issues in connection with the needs of carers.
During the recent Carers Week I visited the Charlie Ratchford Centre in Camden to celebrate the launch of initiatives to help local carers and to discuss with them issues related to their needs.
Mr. Jenkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will estimate how many more people would be eligible for carers allowance if the gainfully employed rate was (a) raised to £168 per week and (b) abolished; and if he will make a statement. [80136]
Mrs. McGuire: The requested information is not available because there are no reliable data from which robust estimates might be obtained.
Mr. Byers: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people have lost their carers allowance as a result of reaching pensionable age in each of the last five years. [80447]
Mrs. McGuire [holding answer 26 June 2006]: The information requested is not available. The information that is available is in the table. Carers allowance is payable to carers of state pension age who meet the conditions of entitlement to the allowance and do not receive a state pension, or where the weekly rate of state pension paid is lower than the weekly rate of carers allowance. In those cases a reduced rate of carers allowance is paid to bring the total amount of state pension and carers allowance paid up to the carers allowance weekly rate.
Carers allowance and state pension cannot be paid at the same time because both of them are non-income-related benefits designed to provide a degree of replacement for lost or forgone income.
In cases where these arrangements preclude the payment of carers allowance, the carers entitlement to
the allowance gives them access to the carer premium, currently £26.35 a week, in the income-related benefits such as income support, housing benefit and council tax benefit and to the equivalent additional amount for carers in pension credit.
Carers allowance: number of women aged 60 and men aged 65 awarded a state pension from December 2001 to November 2005 who in the quarterly statistical period in which the award was made were recorded as entitled to, but not receiving payments of, the allowance | |
Quarterly statistical periods spanning (December to November) | Number( 1) |
(1) Sum of figures for four quarterly statistical periods, rounded to the nearest 10. (2) Figure is for the period March 2002 to November 2002. Data are not available for the period December 2001 to February 2002. Source: Information Directorate Work and Pensions Longitudinal Study. |
David Simpson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what percentage of staff in his Department are making additional voluntary contributions to their pension. [73105]
Mrs. McGuire: Members of the principal civil service pension scheme (PCSPS) can pay additional contributions to top up their pension either through the civil service additional voluntary contributions scheme (CSAVCS), a money purchase arrangement, or by buying added years of service in the PCSPS. As an alternative to membership of the PCSPS recruits from 1 October 2002 have been able to join a stakeholder arrangement, the partnership pension account.
The number and percentage of staff in the Department who are making additional voluntary contributions to their pension as at 31 May 2006 are shown in the table.
Number | Percentage | |
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions pursuant to the answer of 16 June 2006, Official Report, columns 1477-79W, on sickness/unauthorised absence, what information his Department has on levels of sickness absence at the Disability and Carers Service; and if he will make a statement. [81759]
Mrs. McGuire: The Disability and Carers' Service became an Executive Agency of the Department for Work and Pensions on 1 November 2004. The information has been drawn from the Agency's own records, and the only full year's data are for 2005. The figures represent average working days lost per staff year.
2005: 9.9
The rolling year to date data which are captured on a month by month basis within the Agency continue to show a modest but steady trend of improvement; the April 2006 year to date figure was 9.5 AWDL.
Mr. Hunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many households in Surrey include a person with a learning disability who receives the care component of disability living allowance at the (a) highest, (b) middle and (c) lowest rate. [82449]
Mrs. McGuire: The administration of disability living allowance is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Disability and Carers Service, Mr. Terry Moran. He will write to the hon. Member with the information requested.
You asked the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many households in Surrey include a person with a learning disability who receives the care component of disability living allowance at the (a) highest (b) middle and (c) lowest rate.
The Minister for Disabled People, Anne McGuire MP, promised you a substantive reply from the Chief Executive of the Disability and Carers Service.
The information available is in the following table:
Recipients of disability living allowance with learning difficulties by rate of care award as at November 2005 in Surrey parliamentary constituencies | ||||
Care component | ||||
Total with care component | Higher rate | Middle rate | Lowest rate | |
Notes: 1. Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10. 2. Totals may not sum due to rounding. 3. Parliamentary constituencies are assigned by matching postcodes against the relevant postcode directory. 4. Figures are based on the care component condition only. 5. Information is only available for the Surrey parliamentary constituencies. Source: DWP, WPLS 100 percent data. |
Next Section | Index | Home Page |