| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Development, Innovation and Support Contracts Project
Mr. Clegg: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs what progress has been made on the Development, Innovation and Support Contracts project; and if she will make a statement. [82554]
Vera Baird: The DISC Programme is due to announce award of contracts in the fourth quarter of 2006 and is on target to achieve this.
DNA Bioscience
Mr. Laws: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs pursuant to the answer of22 June 2006, Official Report, columns 2082-86W, on DNA Bioscience, whether DNA Bioscience made an application to be added to the accredited list. [82475]
Ms
Harman: I refer the hon. Member for Yeovil to the answer
given to him on 22 June 2006, Official Report, columns 2082-86W.
As indicated in the paragraphs headed “DNA Diagnostics Center
and DNA Bioscience”, DNA Bioscience was not itself accredited by
the Department for Constitutional Affairs to carry out court directed
tests under section 20 of the Family Law Reform Act 1969. DNA
Bioscience was not eligible to be accredited by DCA as it was not a
testing facility, so had no ISO 17025 accreditation. Following an
application from DNA Bioscience, DCA agreed that DNA Diagnostics Center
(the laboratory DNA Bioscience used to conduct DNA tests) could be
added to the accredited list. The
Department then agreed orally in December 2004, that DNA
Bioscience’s details could be added to the accredited list, but
this was not as a result of an application for accreditation. The
intention was to add those details as a referral route to the
accredited body (DNA Diagnostics
Center).
Judicial Review
Mr. Amess: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs on what occasions an (a) individual and (b) organisation has applied for a judicial review of decisions of her Department in each year since 1997; and what the outcome was of each case where proceedings have been completed. [80474]
Vera Baird: The information requested is notheld centrally and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
Libra
Mr. Clegg: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs how many magistrates courts are using the Libra computer system. [82555]
Ms Harman: There are nine magistrates courts using the Libra case management system.
Official Residences
Mr. Heald: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs if she will list the official residences for which her Department is responsible; who occupies each one; what the annual cost is of running each property; what contribution the occupants of each make towards running costs; what the total capital and refurbishment expenditure was on those properties in 2004-05; how much was spent in each property on (a) flowers and plants, (b) wine and entertaining, (c) food, (d) telephone bills and (e) electricity and gas in 2004-05; how many (i) domestic and (ii) maintenance staff are employed at each property, broken down by post; and what the total cost of staff employment was in 2004-05. [50876]
Vera Baird: My Department is not responsible for any official residences.
The Palace of Westminster is responsible for the maintenance of the Lord Chancellor’s residence in the House of Lords and for any work that needs to be carried out. There are no permanent staff employed at the residence. The Lord Chancellor’s Private Office is responsible for the administration of the residence in terms of organising tours of the residence and keeping the diary of charitable functions. The Department do not make any contributions to the running cost of the Lord Chancellor’s residence in the House of Lords.
The cost of (b) wine and entertaining and (c) food for the years 2004 and 2005 are as follows:
| Amount (£) | |
My Department is not responsible for (a) flowers and plants, (d) telephone bills or (e) gas and electricity bills nor are we responsible for (i) domestic or (ii) maintenance staff.
With respect to the contribution made by occupants: Ministers occupying official residences do not pay tax on the living accommodation itself. However tax is paid on the ancillary services (lighting, heating etc.) at a sum limited to his/her taxable ministerial salary and benefit (if any).
Parliamentary Boundaries
Mr. Gregory Campbell: To ask the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs when the final outcome of the Parliamentary Boundary Commission will (a) be published and (b) become effective for the purpose of the election on which these boundaries would be used. [81854]
Mr. Hanson: I have been asked to reply as this question relates to the Northern Ireland Parliamentary Boundary Commission.
The Parliamentary Boundary Commission for Northern Ireland is required to submit its final report to the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland by June 2007. The Secretary of State must then lay the Commission’s final recommendations (with or without modifications) before Parliament for approval.
Work and Pensions
Economically Inactive
Mr. Laws: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many and what proportion of the2 million economically inactive people who would like to work are receiving benefits, broken down by benefit. [75345]
Mr. Plaskitt: In January-March 2006 there were 7,943,000 inactive people of working age in the United Kingdom. Of these 2,019,000 (25 per cent.) wanted to work.(1)
Latest LFS data suggests that of the 2 million inactive people who want to work: around one quarter are claiming housing and or council tax benefit; around 15 per cent. are claiming sickness or disability benefits (excluding disabled persons tax credit); around 17 per cent. are claiming child benefit; less than two per cent were claiming jobseeker’s allowance; and around one third are not claiming benefits.(2)
Comparison between the data collected by the LFS and administrative data shows that the LFS consistently undercounts benefit claimants. However, the LFS data give an indication of the benefits received. It is important to note because of these caveats and the small sample sizes of the data used, the figures above are subject to a great degree of uncertainty.
(1) Labour Force Survey (LFS), January-March 2006.
(2) Labour Force Survey Winter 2005.
Jobcentre Plus
Sir John Butterfill: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what representations he has received on the closure of much of the Jobcentre Plus office in Cotlands Road, Bournemouth; what assessment he has made of (a) the capacity of the revised arrangements to deal with inquiries from claimants unable to get help or advice on the telephone and (b) the number of officers in management roles at the Chippenham office; what the average time taken to process an application for benefits has been in each of the last three months; and if he will make a statement. [71264]
Mr. Jim Murphy: The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, Lesley Strathie. I have asked her to provide the hon. Member with the information requested.
Letter from Lesley Strathie, dated 6 July 2006:
The Secretary of State has asked me to reply to your question asking what representations he has received since the closure of much of the Jobcentre Plus office in Cotlands Road Bournemouth; what assessment he has made of (a) the capacity of the revised arrangements to deal with inquiries from claimants unable to get help or advice on the telephone and (b) the number of officers in management roles at the Chippenham office; what the average time taken to process an application for benefits has been in each of the last three months. This is something which falls within the responsibilities delegated to me as the Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus.
I fully accept that the services offered to our customers in Bournemouth and Poole over the last few months has not been as I would want. We are part of the way through the creation of a network of Benefit Delivery Centres to modernise the processing of claims for benefit. Chippenham, which serves customers in Bournemouth and Poole, is one of these sites and I regret to say that there have been a number of local issues which have had the effect of reducing the level of service below acceptable levels. Specifically, we have been short of experienced staff and some key management posts were unfilled which has inhibited our ability to respond to local problems. Experience levels are growing and we have recently filled all of the management posts. We now have four senior managers on site and 22 junior managers to support them.
We have developed a local improvement plan and a number of steps have already been taken with some early signs of improvement showing through in the data for April. These steps include the recruitment of 38 additional staff and the transfer of four experienced Incapacity Benefit staff from another site to bolster experience levels. We have also reviewed our internal process from first contact by the customer to payment, which will reduce the time it takes to assess claims. We are reviewing progress against this plan weekly and putting in place arrangements to clear the arrears of claims that have built up by lending Chippenham additional help from outside.
I have set out in the attached tables the latest data on claims clearance at Chippenham and representations received. Neil Couling, Director of Benefits and Fraud, would be more than happy to meet with you to discuss these.
Finally, you ask about the difficulties being experienced by customers getting through to Chippenham by phone. Some technical issues have exacerbated problems but I am pleased to say that these issues are being addressed. Our contractors hope the service will start to improve in July. Benefit Delivery Centres have a key role to play in supporting the improvements to our services, including improving processing times and reducing fraud and error in the benefit system. For customers who are unable to access our services through the telephone or electronically, we still have other options including office interviews and home visits.
I hope this is helpful.
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis
John Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many individuals diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis who attended a medical tribunal were successful in (a) 2003, (b) 2004 and (c) 2005. [81968]
Vera Baird: I have been asked to reply as responsibility for Social Security and Child Support appeals now falls to the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs.
The requested information is not available. Details are not kept about the nature of the medical condition of people who attend appeal tribunals.
John Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what arrangements are in place to ensure that medical tribunals for individuals diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis who are housebound are held in a location convenient for the claimant. [81969]
Vera Baird: I am answering this question as responsibility for social security and child support appeals now falls to the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs.
Social security and child support appeals are heard at a network of around 130 venues throughout Great Britain. Where a party to the proceedings wishes to attend an oral hearing but is unable to travel due to a medical condition, a legally qualified panel member may agree that the hearing can be held at an alternative suitable location, including the person’s home.
National Insurance Contributions
Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will estimate (a) the number of people due to retire after 2010 who have paid voluntary national insurance contributions and who would otherwise have qualified for a full basic pension on the basis of 30 contribution years required for a full state pension and (b) the total amount of such overpayment. [77988]
James Purnell: The information is not available in the format requested.
National Insurance Numbers
David Davis: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many individuals applying for a national insurance number were referred to the Immigration and Nationality Directorate in (a) the last six months, (b) the last 12 months and (c) each of the last five years due to (i) suspicion about their eligibility to work in the UK, (ii) the use of false documents and (iii) other reasons. [75703]
Mr. Plaskitt: Between 1 April 2005 and 31 March 2006, 3309 cases were referred to the Immigration and Nationality Directorate. Of these, 772 were referred due to the use of false documents and 2537 were referred as potential immigration offenders. Figures are not available prior to the 1 April 2005 as the information was not formally recorded. No further breakdown is available.
Pathways to Work Pilot Areas
Mr. Hunt: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his Department's estimate is of the cost to date of personal adviser time per work-focused interview in Pathways to work pilot areas. [49802]
Mr. Jim Murphy: The total cost to date per work-focused interview (or unit cost) is not available and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.
In response to PSA target requirements, Jobcentre Plus do publish the unit costs for job broking and benefit processing every year in their annual report and accounts. The PSA unit costs for job broking activities and benefit processing for 2004-05 were as shown in the following table.
| Benefit | Unit cost (£) |
Pensions
Mr. Philip Hammond: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what his latest estimate is of the number of women in the UK who will retire between1 May 2005 and 31 April 2010 with (a) 30 years or more of class 1 national insurance contributions and (b) more than 30 but less than 39 years of national insurance contributions. [77999]
James Purnell: The information is not available in the format requested.
Personal Capability Assessment
Mr. Ruffley: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (1) which organisations his Department has had meetings with on the proposed reform of the Personal Capability Assessment referred to in the Green Paper “A new deal for welfare”; [75376]
(2) which individuals form the expert panels set up by the Department since the publication of the Green Paper “A new deal for welfare” to formulate policy on reforming the Personal Capability Assessment; and which bodies they represent. [75386]
Mr. Jim Murphy: As part of the Welfare Reform Green Paper consultation we have met a large number of stakeholders to discuss the full range of our reform proposals. With many of these we discussed our proposals to transform the PCA. Because of the number of organisations involved we are not able to list all the individuals and groups involved. We continue to meet with organisation to discuss the proposals.
In addition, the Department has created a series of working groups, comprising medical, technical and stakeholder experts, to advise and assist in the work to transform the Personal Capability Assessment (PCA). The membership of each of the groups is in the tables
| Overarching PCA Consultative Group | |
| Name | Organisation |
| Mental Health Consultative Group | |
| Name | Organisation |
| Mental Health Technical Working Group( 1) | |
| Name | Organisation |
| Physical Descriptors Technical Working Group( 1) | |
| Name | Organisation |
| Review of evidence gathering from GPs( 1) | |
| Name | Organisation |
| (1)
Members of the Technical Groups were chosen for the experience they
bring to the groups, not the organisations they are employed by or are
members of. They do not necessary represent the views of these
organisations on the
groups. | |
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |