Previous Section Index Home Page

17 July 2006 : Column 147W—continued

Television Licences

Mr. Dai Davies: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment he has made of the effects on pensioners of the discontinuation of the sale of television licences in post offices. [85098]

Jim Fitzpatrick: The decision to withdraw the purchase of TV licences from post offices was a commercial one made by the BBC which has a duty to TV licence holders to achieve value for money with its licence fee income. Although customers will not be able to pay for their TV licences at post offices after 31 July, they will be able to purchase TV licences by direct debit, online or at over 15,000 ‘Paypoint’ facilities situated around the country in local newsagents, convenience stores, supermarkets, and petrol stations.

Waste Disposal

Kerry McCarthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the meeting of EU Member States in Brussels on 26 June regarding the Restrictions on Hazardous Substances and Waste Electrical Equipment Directives; and whether a decision was reached as to whether pipe organs would fall within the scope of these Directives. [84609]


17 July 2006 : Column 148W

Malcolm Wicks: It was certainly never envisaged that these directives would apply to church and other pipe organs, although there was some legal uncertainty in the final text.

Following the meeting held in Brussels on 26 June, the European Commission has clarified that pipe organs are outside the scope of the new rules.

I am, therefore, very pleased to confirm that the legal uncertainties have now been resolved and pipe organs are considered to be clearly outside the scope of the restriction of hazardous substances (RoHS) and waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) directives.

Zimbabwe

Kate Hoey: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on UK-Zimbabwe trade relations [80264]

Mr. McCartney: There has been a substantial fall in UK-Zimbabwe trade in recent years. In 2000, UK and Zimbabwe two-way trade amounted to £143 million. Imports from Zimbabwe were mainly agricultural products with tobacco, making up approximately 31 per cent. of the total imports. Exports were mainly manufactured goods, with office machines and ADP equipment topping the table at £5.3 million.

By 2005, two-way trade had fallen to £66 million. The principal change was in tobacco imports, which fell to £4.8 million from £31 million in 2000 down 85 per cent. Exports also fell, with the leading export, road vehicles, topping the table at £3.5 million. The decline in trade can be attributed to the policies of the Government of Zimbabwe which have brought about the fall of both imports and exports.

A breakdown of UK exports and imports by sector for 2004 and 2005 is shown in the following table.

HMG have not imposed any economic sanctions or restrictions on doing business in Zimbabwe and two-way trade continues, although as the aforementioned figures show, at a substantially reduced level. It is our view that economic sanctions would harm the people of Zimbabwe at a time of humanitarian crisis, while having very little impact on the ZANU (PF) leadership. The people of Zimbabwe have suffered enough.


17 July 2006 : Column 149W

17 July 2006 : Column 150W
UK trade with Zimbabwe
Division and description £000

Top 10 UK exports

2004

75 Office machines and ADP equipment

4,878

78 Road vehicles

4,563

76 Telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus

2,648

72 Specialised industrial machinery

1,807

74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes and machine parts nes

1,590

77 Electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes and electrical parts thereof

1,111

71 Power generating machinery and equipment

899

87 Professional, scientific and control instruments (and apparatus nes)

557

67 Iron and steel

505

26 Textile fibres

498

Total of top 10

19,056

Total trade

26,005

2005

78 Road vehicles

3,473

75 Office machines and ADP equipment

3,379

72 Specialised industrial machinery

2,370

76 Telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus

1,545

74 General industrial machinery and equipment, nes and machine parts nes

1,528

71 Power generating machinery and equipment

1,238

00 Live animals other than of Div. 03

740

26 Textile fibres

716

87 Professional, scientific and control instruments (and apparatus nes)

702

77 Electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, nes and electrical parts thereof

670

Total of top 10

16,362

Total trade

22,113

Top 10 UK imports

2004

06 Sugar, sugar preparations and honey

22,554

05 Vegetables and fruit

8,185

12 Tobacco and tobacco manufactures

8,182

82 Furniture and parts thereof; bedding, mattresses, supports, cushions and similar stuffed furnishings

1,675

66 Non-metallic mineral manufactures

1,256

07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices and manufactures thereof

1,212

68 Non-ferrous metals

956

65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes

935

76 Telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus

464

29 Crude animal and vegetable materials

317

Total of top 10

45,736

Total trade

47,779

2005

66 Non-metallic mineral manufactures

14,970

06 Sugar, sugar preparations and honey

13,087

05 Vegetables and fruit

7,182

12 Tobacco and tobacco manufactures

4,768

82 Furniture and parts thereof; bedding, mattresses, supports, cushions and similar stuffed furnishings

912

07 Coffee, tea, cocoa, spices and manufactures thereof

495

65 Textile yarn, fabrics, made-up articles, nes

374

67 Iron and steel

217

84 Articles of apparel and clothing accessories

144

79 Other transport equipment

117

Total of top 10

42,266

Total trade

43,564

Source: DTI Analysis of HM Revenue and Customs data.

Written Answers to Questions

Monday 17 July 2006

Treasury

Annuities

Steve Webb: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the response by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury of 4 July 2006, Official Report, column 729, on the Finance (No. 2) Bill, if he will place in the Library a note setting out the basis for his calculation of the £100 million cost of amendments to the rules on the compulsory purchase of annuities. [83603]

Ed Balls: The Exchequer cost arising from this proposal depends upon behavioural responses. But, assuming that the technical deficiencies with the proposal would be corrected, we stated a conservative overall initial cost of the measure of around £100 million per annum. Our longer term estimate of the overall costs is around £175 to £225 million per annum.

This potential cost consists of two main elements. First, allowing larger lump sums to be taken out and taxed at marginal rate at age 75 would have a tax cost because additional pension savings would be induced.

The up-front tax cost of these additional pension savings is estimated to be in the region of £300 to £500 million per annum. Around three quarters of this would be reclaimed as income tax on the resulting retirement benefits. This gives a broad range for this part of the costing of £75 to £125 million per annum. We used the lower range of this estimate for our conservative initial cost.

Secondly, allowing individuals to leave pensions untouched until death and then bequeath the capital would reduce income tax on pensions in payment. As any additional savings held in pension assets at death would largely displace other liquid assets, held inheritance tax (IHT) would not increase to offset this income tax lost. Even if wealth held at death were to increase as a result of the tabled amendments, the average effective rate of IHT on such assets would still be far below the rate of income tax. Only 6 per cent. of estates have an IHT charge.

The longer term costs of this behaviour are very uncertain but are estimated at £100 million per annum in lost income tax. But this would take time to build up and we have used one quarter of this amount for our conservative initial cost.

Computer Learning Centres

Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many computer learning centres have been set up in each year since 1999. [84792]

Phil Hope: I have been asked to reply.


17 July 2006 : Column 152W

The term “computer learning centres” potentially covers a wide range of provision, not all of which would have been funded by Government.

However, I can say that between 1999 and 2003, with funding from the Capital Modernisation Fund and the New Opportunities Fund, around 6,000 UK online centres were established across England.

Mr. Francois: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how much his Department has spent on computer learning centres in each year since 1999; and if he will make a statement. [84793]

Phil Hope: I have been asked to reply.

The term “computer learning centres” potentially covers a wide range of provision, not all of which would have been funded by Government.

However, I can say that between 1999 and 2003, a total of £396 million from the Capital Modernisation Fund and the New Opportunities Fund was invested in setting up UK online centres across England.

Data Protection

Mr. Gray: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer pursuant to the Answer of 26 June 2006, Official Report, column 92W, on data protection, what is the longest period of time that has elapsed for HM Revenue and Customs to respond to its satisfaction to a subject access request in the first instance. [84939]

Dawn Primarolo [holding answer 13 July 2006]: The response meeting this description was the case cited in my reply of 26 June. The original letter was an appeal against a separate HMRC decision, although it also contained a subject access request.

Demographics

Mr. Stewart Jackson: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) the UK, (b) Peterborough constituency and (c) the Peterborough City Council area is aged (i) under 25, (ii) between 25 and 34, (iii) between 35 and 44, (iv) between 45 and 54, (v) between 55 and 64 and (vi) over 65. [85992]

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 17 July 2006:


Next Section Index Home Page