Written Ministerial Statements
Thursday 20 July 2006
Treasury
Double Taxation (Poland)
The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo): A new Double Taxation Convention with Poland was signed on 20 July 2006. After signature, the text of the convention was deposited in the Libraries of both Houses and made available on HM Revenue and Customs’ website. The text of the convention will be scheduled to a draft Order in Council and laid before the House of Commons in due course.
ECOFIN
The Chancellor of the Exchequer (Mr. Gordon Brown): At its meeting of 11 July 2006, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council took note of a presentation from the Finnish presidency on its work programme for the Council during the second half of 2006. Priorities include addressing the challenges of globalisation, efficient functioning of the internal market and further economic and structural reforms.
ECOFIN adopted a 104(12) Decision abrogating Cyprus’s Excessive Deficit Procedure (EDP) and Council Conclusions on Portugal’s progress in addressing its EDP.
Council adopted a decision allowing Slovenia to adopt the Euro as its currency as from 1 January 2007.
ECOFIN adopted a set of conclusions regarding the first year of the revised Stability and Growth Pact.
Council discussed the renewal of the EIB’s external lending mandates, which will set the amounts and strategic priorities of the EIB’s operations outside the ED. The Council requested the Economic and Financial Committee to oversee further work on the proposal and will discuss this again at its meeting on10 October.
ECOFIN was briefed by the Commission on economic dialogues with third countries and held an exchange of views. The UK welcomed the economic content of the EU-US Vienna Declaration as well as further ECOFIN discussion on the key issues for these dialogues.
ECOFIN adopted Council conclusions on a Commission proposal for the funding of the International Accounting Standards Board.
The Financial Secretary to the Treasury represented the UK.
Income Support/Job Seekers Allowance
The Paymaster General (Dawn Primarolo): The Chief Secretary made a statement on 12 July 2005, Official Report, column 723, on timing of the phased transfer on to child tax credit (CTC) of the remaining families with children receiving family support through Income Support/Job Seekers Allowance.
Following further consideration of the proposed timetable, I have decided that the transfer should be deferred until 2007. My decision reflects the fact that it is extremely important to safeguard continuity of support for children among this particularly vulnerable group. The postponement will allow a number of planned tax credits measures, which I announced at the pre-Budget report, some of which require system changes, to be introduced before support for these families’ children is transferred to child tax credit.
I will make a final decision next year on whether the transfer should go ahead in 2007 as currently planned. My decision will again be taken in the light of the importance I attach to ensuring the continuity of support that these families receive for their children. Families will continue to receive financial support through their benefits until they are transferred on to child tax credit.
It remains the Government’s firm intention to migrate all income-based support for children into a single, seamless system of support delivered through child tax credit.
Culture, Media and Sport
Government Indemnity Scheme
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport (Mr. David Lammy): On 26 January 2006 I made a statement to the House regarding the Government Indemnity Scheme. In that statement, we reported a figure of £1,286,220,279 as the contingent liability of non-national museums as at 30 September 2005.
It has since been brought to my attention that the non-national museums' contingent liability figure, produced by the Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, should have been £1,292,909,094.
Defence
Northern Ireland Future Allowances and Changes
The
Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Mr. Adam
Ingram): On 1 August 2005 the Secretary of State for
Northern Ireland announced the start of the normalisation programme
outlined in the Joint Declaration. Stage 1 of this programme will be
complete by 31 July 2007 and, at that time, operation banner will end.
An allowances and charges package specific to the operational, security
and welfare
circumstances of operation banner is currently in place. With the end of
operation banner, however, Northern Ireland will no longer be classed
as an operational theatre and, as a result, there will be a number of
changes to the package. On 1 August 2007, personnel serving in Northern
Ireland will commence payment of food and accommodation charges, and
contributions in lieu of Council Tax on the same basis as those
elsewhere in the United Kingdom and overseas. Other provisions
associated with operational status will also cease, such as operational
telephone allowance, welfare entertainment, free e-blueys and the award
of operational medals. Other Northern Ireland-related allowances,
including: Northern Ireland resident’s supplement, which is paid
to all personnel serving on permanent assignment in Northern Ireland,
in recognition of the impact of the security situation on them and
their families; Northern Ireland journeys, which allows personnel and
their accompanying families to return to Britain regularly to obtain
respites from the pressures of living in Northern Ireland; and other
lesser provisions will be retained for the time being, but will be kept
under review as the normalisation programme
progresses.
Gulf Veterans
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Mr. Tom Watson): A key principle of the Government’s approach to addressing the health concerns of veterans of the 1990-91 Gulf conflict is that there should be appropriate research into veterans’ illnesses and factors that may have a bearing on these.
As a key part of that research, the Ministry of Defence has sponsored an investigation by the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Porton Down, into the possible health effects of the combination of vaccines and tablets given to troops at the time of the 1990-91 Gulf conflict to protect them against the threat of biological and chemical warfare. The main body of work involved monitoring multiple factors in marmosets for up to 18 months following the administration of vaccines and/or pyridostigmine bromide (the active ingredient in nerve agent pre-treatment tablets). Interim results were announced on1 April 2003, official report, column, 55WS.
Papers reporting final results from two elements of the main study have now been published in the online version of the journal “Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior” and hard copy publication will follow. A summary of the papers is available on the “Articlesin Press” section of the journal’s website: www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00913057. The papers report that there were no long-term changes of biological significance in cognition, muscle function, general health, brain electrical activity and sleep that could be attributed to administration of vaccines and/or pyridostigmine bromide.
The
publication of these findings in a peer-reviewed journal should be
welcomed by Gulf veterans in addressing a key area of concern to them.
It represents a further step towards meeting the Department’s
commitment to investigate these issues. Further results on the
immunological aspects of the study will be published in due
course.
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Advisory Committee on Pesticides
The Minister for Climate Change and the Environment (Ian Pearson): The Advisory Committee on Pesticides (ACP) has agreed to trial arrangements to publish the detailed record of its meetings.
The ACP will continue to publish a short summary minute of meetings within three weeks of a meeting. This is published on the ACP website and supports a requirement under the Code of Practice for Scientific Advisory Committees to publish material suitable for a lay readership.
This will be followed with the publication of the full detailed record two to three months after the meeting. This timescale is necessary to allow the Committee's members to review the draft at their subsequent meeting and for consultation with relevant stakeholders to ensure that any commercially confidential information is not disclosed.
Partners for Water and Sanitation
The Minister for Climate Change and the Environment (Ian Pearson): I am pleased to welcome the publication of the fourth annual report from Partners for Water and Sanitation (PAWS) on 28th July. The UK tri-sector partnership is proof this partnership model can produce and deliver tangible, measurable results.
PAWS continues to evolve, providing a solid platform where partners from Government, civil society and business can work together with the people within Africa to develop sustainable solutions in the delivery of water and sanitation services. This report marks a key milestone in the Partners for Water and Sanitation, and outlines the progress made at national and local levels in the four African partner countries—South Africa, Nigeria, Uganda and Ethiopia—including scoping visits and exchange programmes.
It is particularly encouraging to see the partnership is making progress in translating words into actions within its partner countries. I look forward to the continuing progress of the partnership in providing support, building capacity and developing sustainable solutions in partner countries.
Copies of the report will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
GM Crops
The
Minister for Climate Change and the Environment (Ian
Pearson): Defra has today published a consultation paper
on proposals for managing the coexistence of GM and non-GM crops in
England,
should GM crops be grown here commercially in due course. The paper is
consistent with the Government's overall policy on GM crops, as set out
in the parliamentary statement made by then Defra Secretary of State,
Margaret Beckett, on 9 March
2004.
The proposals relate to managing coexistence between farms and focus on the specific measures that would be needed for crops of maize, beet, potato and oilseed rape. It is proposed that the key measures required for an effective co-existence regime will be implemented on a statutory basis, with other, less significant measures to be applied via an industry code of practice.
The Defra paper also seeks views on a number of related issues:
whether special rules should apply for coexistence between GM and organic crops:
options for compensating financial losses that non-GM farmers might face due to the presence of GM material in their crops
whether there should be a public GM crop register
guidance to farmers on voluntary GM-free zones
No commercial GM cultivation is expected in the UK before 2009 at the earliest, but we need to prepare for this possibility in good time, so that farmers are clear what rules would apply.
Copies of the consultation paper will be deposited in the Libraries of both Houses and will also be available on the Defra website at http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/gm/crops/index.htm. The deadline for responses to the paper is 20 October 2006.
Crop Spraying
The Minister for Climate Change and the Environment (Ian Pearson): My noble Friend the Minister of State Lord Rooker has today published the Government's response to the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (RCEP) report “Crop Spraying and the Health of Residents and Bystanders”. This response sets out the Government's view on the recommendations made by the Royal Commission and indicates how we intend to address them. I have placed copies of the response in the Library of each House.
Firstly, I would like to thank the Royal Commission for producing this report which was requested by the right. hon Member for Cardiff, South and Penarth (Alun Michael) when Minister for Rural Affairs and Local Environment Quality, to examine the science on which the current pesticide approvals system is based and the reasons for people's concerns about possible adverse health effects from pesticide spraying.
The Government recognise the clearly genuine concerns of some residents and bystanders about the spraying of pesticides, Government can, and will, do more to address these concerns.
I
firmly believe that these concerns are best addressed at the local
level through dialogue between residents and farmers to identify and
understand the issues and to develop mutually agreeable solutions. I
also believe that this can be achieved most rapidly
through a voluntary approach that allows for innovative and flexible
solutions.
Existing voluntary schemes such as Farm Assurance and the Voluntary Initiative have demonstrated how effective non-statutory approaches can be in changing behaviour. I want to see schemes such as these playing a crucial role in ensuring that both farmers and the public can have a greater mutual understanding of the problems they each face. These schemes have the potential to provide farmers both with the practical support and the incentive to be good neighbours in this regard and I will be discussing with these organisations and others how this might be achieved.
I believe that the proposals set out in the Government's response, a number of which are already underway, can achieve the majority of outcomes envisaged by the Royal Commission without theneed for additional burdensome regulation on the agricultural sector.
The Government have also noted the concern of both the Royal Commission and some members of the public with how the risks to residents and bystanders are considered in the approvals process. To address this concern I have requested a complete review of the model used to assess resident and bystander exposure as part of the pesticide approvals process.
The current approvals process is adequate with clear safety margins built in. However, I recognise that it needs to be more clearly demonstrated to the public that approvals are based on high quality underpinning science. To address this the revised exposure model will give more explicit consideration to a wider range of possible exposure routes and will reflect modern farming practices. The research to develop this model has already begun. A former member of the Royal Commission was one of the peer reviewers for the proposal before it was approved and Defra's Chief Scientific Adviser will ensure the development of the model meets acceptable scientific standards.
The UK is also taking a primary role on this issue in Europe, taking the lead in revising the guidance on acceptable exposure limits, including the assessment of resident and bystander exposure, for the European Commission.
The Government have considered the findings ofthe report very thoroughly alongside additional independent scientific advice. The Department of Health has sought the views of the Committees on Toxicity and on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment on the report's health recommendations and Defra has additionally considered advice from the Chief Scientific Adviser and the Advisory Committee on Pesticides on the wider recommendations of the report. In addition to this scientific advice we have also considered the views of interested parties from all sides of the debate.
The scientific advice we have received is clear that there is insufficient evidence to support the Royal Commission's recommendations for additional regulatory measures on safety grounds. Introducing regulations for other reasons such as perceived nuisance from spraying would be incompatible with the Government's Better Regulation policy. We have therefore decided against introducing any new regulations at this time.
Animal Products (Import Controls)
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Mr. Ben Bradshaw): The Annual Review of Controls on Imports of Animal Products for the financial year 2005-06, as required under the Animal Health Act 1981 (as amended by the Animal Health Act 2002), will be laid before Parliament tomorrow.
Copies of the Review will be placed in the Libraries of both Houses and on the Defra personal food imports website www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/illegali
Hard copies will be available on request.
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
General Affairs and External Relations Council
The Minister for Europe (Mr. Geoffrey Hoon): My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary and Sir John Grant (UK permanent representative to the EU) represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) in Brussels on 17 July.
The agenda items covered were as follows:
Presentation of Presidency Priorities
The Council took note of the presidency priorities which included the Middle East, Enlargement, Energy, Central Asia, Human Rights and Relations with Russia.
The Council adopted conclusions: welcoming the outcome of the Euro-Africa Ministerial Conference on Migration and Development in Rabat on 10-11 July; expressing its concern about the increasing illegal migratory flows in the Mediterranean and the Atlantic; and underlining the need to address the situation, including further work on East African routes.
World Trade Organisation/Doha Development Agenda (WTO/DDA).
Commissioner Mandelson briefed the Council on developments in the current round of trade negotiations.
Procedural conclusions were adopted allowing the Council to meet in special session in July or August if a WTO Ministerial were called.
High representative Solana stressed the need for the international community to continue support for the African Union Mission in Sudan (AMIS) until UN transition, as well as putting pressure on the Sudanese Government to accept the UN mission. The high representative hoped that a high level-conference in Brussels on 18 July would make progress on both these issues.
The
Council adopted conclusions: reiterating EU support for the Darfur
Peace Agreement; emphasising
the importance of an effective AMIS; and urging the Sudanese Government
to agree to UN
transition.
Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)
The Council discussed the forthcoming elections in DRC on 30 July. External Relations Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner said that the EU’s election observation mission in DRC, working with other international delegations and with MONUC (UN mission in DRC) and EUFOR (EU force in DRC) on security issues, should help ensure a smooth election process.
The Council agreed conclusions urging the Congolese to seize the opportunity offered by the elections and the authorities to fully comply with democratic principles and noting the ongoing deployment of the EUFOR and the EU election observation mission.
The Council was briefed by UN Special Envoy Martti Ahtisaari on the state of play of the Kosovo status process. The EU would have a key role to play in Kosovo post-settlement.
The Council adopted conclusions on Kosovo reiterating its full support for Ahtisaari and his efforts in conducting the political process to determine Kosovo’s fixture status and welcoming the joint report by High Representative Solana and the Commissioner for Enlargement Rehn on the future EU role and contribution in Kosovo.
Conclusions on Macedonia welcomed the organisation for security and co-operation in Europe’s preliminary assessment that overall parliamentary elections on 5 July met international standards, despite some isolated incidents.
The Council also adopted conclusions recognising Montenegro as a sovereign state and highlighting the importance of regional cooperation in the framework of the stabilisation and association process.
An Extended Troika (the presidency, incoming presidency, enlargement Commissioner Rehn and high representative Solana) met Serbian Prime Minister Kostunica after the GAERC on 17 July to discuss Serbia’s co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the action plan that Serbia had drawn up on how to deliver on its ICTY commitments.
The presidency stressed that Serbia must begin to implement the action plan immediately with full cooperation with ICTY being a condition for restarting Stabilisation and Association Agreement negotiations.
High Representative Solana briefed the Council on his trip to Lebanon on 16 July.
The Council adopted conclusions: expressing concern at the situation in the Middle East, particularly the deteriorating humanitarian situation and the destruction of civilian infrastructure; supporting the idea of a possible international monitoring presence in Lebanon; and calling for international engagement, especially through High Representative Solana, to de-escalate the crisis.
High representative Solana briefed the Council on his 11 July meeting with Iranian chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani.
The Council adopted conclusions covering the nuclear file, Iran’s approach to the Middle East Peace Process, terrorism and human rights.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |