Previous Section Index Home Page

24 July 2006 : Column 1039W—continued


24 July 2006 : Column 1040W

Russia

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what recent representations he has made to his Russian counterpart regarding security of British investments in Russia. [85087]

Mr. McCartney: Senior officials have regular contact with the Russians on investment questions, including the importance of legal and administrative arrangements which secure and promote British investment in Russia. My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State has not yet had the opportunity personally to meet his Russian counterparts but investment issues will form part of the discussion when he does.

Science Centres

Charles Hendry: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what recent meetings he has held with representatives of science centres to discuss their future role and funding. [87026]

Jim Fitzpatrick: I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the Minister for Higher Education and Lifelong Learning on 20 July 2006, Official Report, columns 651-52W.

Small Businesses

Sarah Teather: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many small businesses operated in (a) Brent, East and (b) Brent in each year since 1997. [87423]

Margaret Hodge: Estimates of the total number of small businesses are only available at a regional level. However, figures for the number of VAT registered businesses are available at the local level. Latest data on the stock of VAT registered businesses at the end of each year since 1997 are shown in the following table for (a) Brent, East constituency and (b) the London borough of Brent.

End year stock of VAT registered businesses, 1997-2004( 1)
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Brent, East Constituency

2,755

2,855

2,960

2,920

2,965

2,990

3,035

3,015

Brent Borough

7,750

8,045

8,260

8,385

8,430

8,450

8,550

8,560

(1 )VAT registration and de-registration data are not available by size of business. However, in Brent borough 98 per cent. of the total stock of VAT registered businesses are small (0-49 employees).
Sources:
Business Start-ups and Closures: VAT Registrations and De-registrations 1994-2004, Small Business Service, available from the Library of the House and also at http://WWW.sbs.gov.uk/vats
Office for National Statistics, UK Business: Activity, Size and Location—2005, available from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/StatBase/Product.asp?vlnk=933

In Brent borough the stock of VAT registered businesses increased each year from 1997 to 2004, rising by 10 per cent. overall. In Brent, East the VAT registered stock rose by 9 per cent. between 1997 and 2004.

Figures based on VAT registered businesses only do not capture all business activity. Businesses are unlikely to be registered if their turnover falls below the compulsory VAT threshold, which has risen in each year since 1997. Only 1.8 million out of 4.3 million businesses (42 per cent.) were registered for VAT at the start of 2004.

Staff Absenteeism

Danny Alexander: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many working days were lost to his Department and its executive agencies in each
24 July 2006 : Column 1041W
year since 1997 due to staff absenteeism, expressed as the average annual number of absent days per employee; and what the estimated total cost to the Department and its agencies of absenteeism was in each year. [78082]

Mr. Darling [holding answer 19 June 2006]: The average annual number of absent days per DTI (core DTI/HQ) employee in each year since 2000 is:

Headcount Full-time equivalent

2005

5.7

5.9

2004

8.0

8.2

2003

7.0

7.2

2002

7.0

7.2

2001

6.7

6.9

2000

6.6

6.8


Using the figure of £1098 pa per person absent used in the “Analysis of Sickness Absence in the Civil Service 2004” report, the estimated total cost of sick absence to DTI HQ in each year 2000 to 2005 is:

£

2005

79,056

2004

129,564

2003

114,192

2002

109,800

2001

101,016

2000

98,820


The DTI does not hold the sick absence data for earlier than 2000.

Supermarket Code of Practice

Andrew George: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what recent discussions he has had with (a) the Competition Commission, (b) the Office of Fair Trading and (c) the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the supermarket code of practice. [87518]

Mr. McCartney: My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State and Ministers meet with the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), Competition Commission (CC) and colleagues at the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on a regular basis to discuss topics of mutual interest.

The OFT referred the grocery market to the CC on 9 May for a market inquiry. Competition in the supermarket and grocery sectors is a matter for the independent competition authorities.

Television Licences

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what discussion took place between his Department and the BBC about the decision not to renew the contract for renewal and purchase of television licences supplied at post offices. [87428]


24 July 2006 : Column 1042W

Jim Fitzpatrick: None. The decision was a commercial one made by the BBC as the television licensing authority looking to the interests of licence fee payers and seeking to ensure the best deal for the public in this capacity.

TPS

Mr. Davey: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many households have signed up to the Telephone Preference Service (TPS); and how many householders live in premises that are protected by TPS regulations by virtue of a previous occupant having registered with the service. [75598]

Margaret Hodge: The information is as follows:

(a) The Direct Marketing Association runs the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) scheme under the terms of contract on behalf of the Office of Communications and the Information Commissioner’s Office has responsibility for enforcement. The TPS estimates that there are currently 12.7 million numbers registered with them. It should be noted that the TPS enables consumers to register individual telephone numbers including mobile numbers, rather than households. At the time of registration the TPS records the consumer’s name, address and telephone number, but this does not give an accurate assessment of how many households are registered with the TPS.

(b) In view of the fact that the TPS registers individual numbers rather than households it is not possible to assess how many householders live in premises protected by the previous occupant’s TPS registration. However, within the next 12 months the TPS intends to identify any TPS registered numbers, which were not registered by the current consumer and will contact them to confirm if they still wish to remain registered.

Mr. Davey: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many individuals have registered with the Telephone Preference Service on more than one occasion. [75600]

Margaret Hodge: The Direct Marketing Association runs the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) scheme on behalf of the Office of Communications and the Information Commissioner’s Office has responsibility for enforcement. The TPS estimates that currently 833,825 consumers have registered the same number on more than one occasion with them. It should be noted that duplicate numbers are not present on the TPS register as they are removed when the TPS carries out their checks to update their records.

Mr. Davey: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry how many complaints have been made against the 10 companies breaching Telephone Preference Service regulations most frequently in the last 12 months. [75701]

Margaret Hodge: The Direct Marketing Association runs the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) scheme on behalf of the Office of Communications and the Information Commissioner's Office has responsibility for enforcement. The TPS records indicate that the total number of complaints made against the top 10
24 July 2006 : Column 1043W
companies for 2005 was 7,701. It should be noted that this figure includes complaints where consumers may not have been registered with the TPS or had not allowed the necessary 28 days to elapse before their registration took effect.

Trade Descriptions Act

Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry if he will make a statement on the operation of the Trade Descriptions (Place of Production) (Marking) Order 1988; how many (a) individuals and (b) companies have been prosecuted under this Order and the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 in each year since 1989; and what recent representations he has received on the operation of this Order. [82891]

Mr. McCartney: According to information obtained from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), the number of prosecutions notified to them by Trading Standards Services under the Trade Descriptions Act 1968 in each year since 1989 are:

Individuals Companies Total

1989

974

448

1,422

1990

1,083

422

1,505

1991

1,111

381

1,492

1992

1,405

395

1,800

1993

1,527

387

1,914

1994

1,234

310

1,544

1995

1,204

318

1,522

1996

847

281

1,128

1997

871

345

1,216

1998

756

238

994

1999

599

162

761

2000

441

154

595

2001

563

168

731

2002

361

114

475

2003

426

151

577

2004

294

86

380

2005

285

76

361

2006

130

34

164

Total

14,111

4,470

18,581


OFT confirm that they received no details of any prosecutions made under the Trade Descriptions (Place of Production) (Marking) Order 1988, which was repealed in 1996 by the Trade Descriptions (Place of Production) (Marking) (Revocation) Order 1996.


Next Section Index Home Page