Previous Section Index Home Page

Port Security

David Davis: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to his answer of 10 July 2006, Official Report, column 1676W, on port security, which ports are in each of the categories referred to. [87301]

John Reid: This information cannot be disclosed as this could provide information of value to those seeking to circumvent immigration controls, thereby prejudicing the prevention and detection of immigration offences.

Pre-comprehensive Spending Review

Dr. Cable: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what discussions he has had with (a) the Treasury and (b) the Cabinet Office regarding the pre-comprehensive spending review report; and if he will make a statement. [82846]

Mr. Byrne: Home Office Ministers have had and will continue to have wide-ranging and regular discussions with the Treasury Ministers about preparations for the 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review.

Pre-Sentencing Reports

Mr. Dismore: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the national standards are for writing pre-sentencing reports; what assessment he has made of the extent to which those national standards are complied with in each probation area; what measures are in place to monitor standards; and if he will make a statement. [87792]

Mr. Sutcliffe: Where a court requests a report from the National Probation Service prior to sentencing, an appropriate assessment will be made of the offender’s risk of harm and the likelihood of re-offending, in order to inform the court of a clear and realistic proposal for sentence or remand.

National standards for the Probation Service are published in the document “National Standards 2005” copies of which can be obtained in the Library and at the following website address: http://www.probation.homeoffice.gov.uk/output/page32.asp#GuideWwO

The national standards specific to pre sentence reports are SS2.5 to SS2.13. To monitor each standard routinely would incur disproportionate costs. SS2.12—“Reports will be prepared within the time scale set by the commissioning court” is monitored and the results for each area can be found in the following. In England and Wales in 2005-06, this standard was met in 97 per cent. of cases. The target is 90 per cent.

Timeliness of court reports July 2005 to March 2006


4 Sep 2006 : Column 1893W
Probation area Total provided Number provided on time Performance against court’s time scale (percentage)

Avon and Somerset

3,433

3,349

98

Bedfordshire

1,098

1,090

99

Cambridgeshire

1,612

1,584

98

Cheshire

2,481

2,444

99

Cumbria

1,529

1,492

98

Derbyshire

3,007

2,977

99

Devon and Cornwall

3,138

2,926

93

Dorset

1,365

1,306

96

County Durham

2,205

2,108

96

Dyfed/Powys

1,280

1,248

98

Essex

3,485

3,475

100

Gloucestershire

1,201

1,138

95

Greater Manchester

10,037

9,842

98

Gwent

1,491

1,428

96

Hampshire

4,049

3,921

97

Hertfordshire

2,104

2,007

95

Humberside

2,810

2,756

98

Kent

2,797

2,729

98

Lancashire

4,730

4,585

97

Leicestershire and Rutland

3,075

3,028

98

Lincolnshire

1,534

1,530

100

London

15,043

14,594

97

Merseyside

3,695

3,559

96

Norfolk

1,839

1,751

95

North Wales

1,680

1,601

95

North Yorkshire

1,763

1,755

100

Northamptonshire

1,141

1,110

97

Northumbria

4,355

4,240

97

Nottinghamshire

4,569

4,486

98

South Wales

4,992

4,848

97

South Yorkshire

4,461

4,371

98

Staffordshire

2,815

2,734

97

Suffolk

1,079

1,060

98

Surrey

1,471

1,439

98

Sussex

2,673

2,633

99

Teesside

2,411

2,306

96

Thames Valley

2,285

2,198

96

Warwickshire

1,127

1,094

97

West Mercia

1,814

1,659

91

West Midlands

10,654

10,398

98

West Yorkshire

6,702

6,598

98

Wiltshire

1,241

1,178

95

England and Wales

136,271

132,575

97


Press Complaints

Mr. Gordon Prentice: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department on how many occasions since 1 April 2003 he has complained to the Press Complaints Commission about the coverage in the press of (a) Ministers or officials and (b) his Department; and how many of these complaints were upheld. [47084]

Mr. McNulty: In the period specified, neither the present Home Secretary, nor either of his predecessors, have complained to the Press Complaints Commission about the coverage in the press of Ministers or officials individually, or the Home Office generally.


4 Sep 2006 : Column 1894W

Preventing Extremism Working Groups

Ms Abbott: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which of the recommendations of the “Preventing Extremism Together” working groups set up in response to the London bombings in July 2005 have been implemented; and what proportion this represents of the number of recommendations. [71936]

Meg Munn [holding answer 19 May 2006]: I have been asked to reply.

Responsibility for leading on this area of work is now with the Department for Communities and Local Government. On 17 July 2006, the Department published on its website details of progress made on the recommendations from the Preventing Extremism Together working groups. Further details can be found at:

http://raceandfaith.communities.gov.uk/raceandfaith/faith/faith-communities/?version=1

Prison Governors

Mr. Bellingham: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what recent assessment he has made of the confidence of prison service staff in governing governors at each prison establishment; and if he will make a statement. [73762]

Mr. Sutcliffe: The 2005 Prison Service staff survey did not contain a specific question of the confidence in governing governors. However, the percentage of respondents who agreed that their senior management team provides effective leadership in each establishment is provided as follows.


4 Sep 2006 : Column 1895W

4 Sep 2006 : Column 1896W

4 Sep 2006 : Column 1897W
Extract from the public sector Prison Service in England and Wales 2006 staff survey showing the percentage of respondents who agree that senior management provide effective leadership
Establishment polled Number of questionnaires returned Percentage response rate Percentage respondents in agreement that senior management team provides effective leadership

Prison Service average

18,704

39

44

Acklington

111

27

24

Albany

116

36

48

Ashwell

144

50

39

Askham Grange

46

50

48

Aylesbury

176

52

47

Bedford

130

51

61

Belmarsh

185

21

22

Birmingham

164

20

38

Blakenhurst

146

31

59

Blantyre House

25

34

60

Blundeston

110

38

34

Brinsford

160

40

46

Bristol

139

30

32

Brixton

149

37

45

Brockhill

55

31

46

Buckley Hall

107

46

35

Bullingdon

145

32

45

Bullwood Hall

59

34

41

Camp Hill

80

28

51

Canterbury

86

41

44

Cardiff

189

40

48

Castington

112

29

61

Channings Wood

131

37

36

Chelmsford

163

45

34

Coldingley

70

34

43

Cookham Wood

52

34

57

Dartmoor

147

39

36

Deerbolt

110

33

47

Dorchester

96

52

64

Dover

64

26

44

Downview

90

38

42

Drake Hall

43

22

37

Durham

175

31

38

East Sutton Park

33

50

39

Eastwood Park

73

27

38

Edmunds Hill

90

38

69

Elmley

97

21

47

Erlestoke

98

41

24

Everthorpe

200

57

51

Exeter

91

25

29

Featherstone

104

33

35

Feltham

193

24

54

Ford

61

33

37

Foston Hall

80

34

50

Frankland

366

40

47

Full Sutton

130

17

32

Garth

205

48

50

Gartree

112

31

27

Glen Parva

108

21

65

Gloucester

90

40

58

Grendon

122

36

46

Guys Marsh

153

51

45

Haslar

53

41

59

Haverigg

122

37

31

Hewell Grange

46

46

58

High Down

192

44

43

Highpoint

97

23

40

Hindley

152

36

44

Hollesley Bay

41

33

39

Holloway

322

57

57

Holme House

148

28

42

Hull

180

32

37

Huntercombe

139

46

48

Kingston

87

62

61

Kirkham

122

46

61

Kirklevington Grange

30

26

20

Lancaster

90

51

48

Lancaster Farms

157

39

34

Latchmere House

40

50

33

Leeds

255

39

32

Leicester

89

36

48

Lewes

102

33

37

Leyhill

111

48

47

Lincoln

167

43

26

Lindholme

177

35

46

Littlehey

112

35

43

Liverpool

153

21

31

Long Lartin

154

24

49

Low Newton

50

17

42

Maidstone

63

20

41

Manchester

257

31

65

Moorland

197

33

34

Morton Hall

103

45

50

New Hall

169

41

36

North Sea Camp

52

36

33

Northallerton

60

41

37

Norwich

137

31

31

Nottingham

115

28

38

Onley

126

31

38

Parkhurst

176

47

37

Pentonville

212

32

32

Portland

110

29

31

Preston

144

34

45

Ranby

137

24

40

Reading

95

45

42

Risley

170

35

37

Rochester

121

41

52

Send

102

62

68

Shepton Mallet

46

32

39

Shrewsbury

108

51

49

Stafford

159

42

34

Standford Hill

68

26

38

Stocken

186J

59

33

Stoke Heath

232

50

45

Styal

93

25

37

Sudbury

113

53

55

Swaleside

172

42

45

Swansea

154

52

34

Swinfen Hall

146

34

61

The Mount

87

27

55

The Verne

103

36

22

Thorn Cross

49

22

45

Usk/Prescoed

104

42

56

Wakefield

173

26

37

Wandsworth

204

29

51

Warren Hill

61

22

60

Wayland

102

33

73

Wealstun

180

43

49

Weare

15

44

33

Wellinborough

185

51

38

Wellington

33

18

39

Wetherby

133

43

48

Whatton

122

43

51

Whitemoor

190

25

26

Winchester

177

44

44

Woodhill

192

28

28

Wormwood Scrubs

164

26

49

Wymott

114

22

40



Next Section Index Home Page