Previous Section Index Home Page

16 Oct 2006 : Column 993W—continued

Category B projects:


16 Oct 2006 : Column 994W

Category C projects( 2) :

Information on category D projects is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

Armoured Vehicles

Mr. Hancock: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence for what reasons he prefers the Pinzgauer Vector armoured vehicles in Afghanistan to the Cougar; and if he will make a statement. [91676]

Mr. Ingram: The Vector and Cougar vehicles provide different capabilities.

The Pinzgauer Vector vehicle is agile and highly mobile over a range of terrains including rugged terrain. It is particularly suitable for the long range patrols, which are a feature of operations in Afghanistan. We also currently plan, however, to deploy a number of upgraded Cougar vehicles (known as Mastiff), which is a heavier and larger vehicle, to provide commanders with a wider choice of vehicles.

Mr. Ellwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence when the (a) Cougar and (b) Vector will be sent to Afghanistan and Iraq. [92319]


16 Oct 2006 : Column 995W

Des Browne: We are procuring around 100 Cougar vehicles and are on schedule to deliver an Initial Operational Capability to Iraq by the end of the year. We are also on schedule to deliver an Initial Operational Capability of the Pinzgauer Vector vehicle to Afghanistan by the end of January 2007.

Mr. Ellwood: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what plans are there to introduce the SG31 as a replacement for the snatch Landrover. [92321]

Des Browne: I announced in my statement on 24 July 2006, Official Report, column 74WS, the procurement of almost 400 vehicles with improved protection for deployment to Iraq and Afghanistan, including Mastiff (also known as Cougar), Vector and up-armoured FV430. These will provide commanders with a range of vehicles of varying protection, mobility and profile, to be used according to operational circumstances. We have no plans to procure RG-31.

Army Continuous Attitude Survey

Nick Harvey: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what proportion of respondents to Question
16 Oct 2006 : Column 996W
39C in the Army Continuous Attitude Survey, September to December 2005 were (a) positive, (b) neutral and (c) negative on the matter. [90135]

Derek Twigg: In carrying out further analysis of Question 39c, an error was discovered in the analysis of the number of comments made by respondents which was used in my answer of 5 July 2006, Official Report, column 1352W. I apologise for this error. For the record, I have issued a correction with the answer to this Parliamentary Question. The analysis of Question 39c is summarised as follows together with revised tables on the number and types of comments. Overall, a total of 90 Officers and 252 Soldiers commented on Question 39c, which equates to 8 per cent. and 16 per cent. respectively of those who responded to the questionnaire.

The numbers of respondents who made positive, neutral or negative comments, or comments that included a mix of all three are given in the following table.

Total comments
Positive Neutral Negative Combined
Total respondents Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage

Officers

90

17

19

3

3

53

59

17

19

Soldiers

252

62

25

10

4

157

62

23

9

Total

342

79

23

13

4

210

61

40

12


Some respondents made more than one comment and the following tables give a breakdown of the comments. This corrects my answer of 5 July. The first table gives a breakdown of whether each of the comments was positive, negative or neutral.

Positive Neutral Negative
Total comments Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage

Officers

129

34

26

7

5

88

68

Soldiers

350

85

24

14

4

251

72

Total

479

119

25

21

4

339

71


This table gives a breakdown of the total number of negative comments made by category:


16 Oct 2006 : Column 997W

16 Oct 2006 : Column 998W
Number of comments
Category Officers Soldiers

1. Stigma attached to complaining

8

13

2. Pressure not to complain

3

7

3. Fear of further victimisation/bad reaction from person responsible for unfair treatment

4

22

4. Would have made the situation worse

7

26

5. Do not know/did not know what to do

3

10

6. Pointless—nothing changes

22

54

7. Did not feel the need to/could not be bothered to complain

5

22

8. Part of Army life

5

7

9. Lack of trust in the system

2

25

10. Leaving soon or moving jobs (respondent or person responsible for unfair treatment)

0

7

11. Currently being dealt with

2

1

12. Effect on career prospects

7

14

13. Dealt with in-house/informal complaint made

0

1

14. Not suffered any unfair treatment

0

0

15. General comments about unfair treatment suffered/suffering (no mention of complaint)

17

40

16. Other (any comments that do not fit the above categories)

3

2


Next Section Index Home Page