The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs (Bridget Prentice): My right hon. and noble Friend the Secretary of State and Lord Chancellor has made the following written ministerial statement:
I wish to make a statement on the development of the Supreme Court for the UK in the light of recent progress since the matter was last discussed in the House on the 24 July 2006.
The Supreme Court implementation programme is on target to deliver the Supreme Court at Middlesex Guildhall in time for the start of the legal year in October 2009.
As the House knows we submitted an application for listed building consent for the Middlesex Guildhall to Westminster city council on the 5 May 2006 and this application was considered at the Council meeting on the 7 September 2006. Throughout this process we have consulted widely with Westminster city council, English Heritage and with the local amenity societies and local residents. Westminster city council planning and City Development Committee resolved unanimously to grant the applications for planning and listed building consent, subject to formal authorisation from English Heritage and the completion of the section 106 agreement.
We are currently working with English Heritage and Westminster city council to finalise the terms of the section 106 agreement.
In parallel with the planning application we have now appointed Kier Group plc as our preferred bidder and we are in commercial discussions with them prior to agreeing the final contract. We expect to reach financial close with Kier Group early in the new year.
The Middlesex Guildhall construction project remains within the capital construction cost estimate of £30 million (at 2004 prices) as detailed in my statement of 14 December 2004.
The capital construction costs involved in the refurbishment of the Middlesex Guildhall will be met by regular charges over a 30-year period as part of the lease and leaseback arrangement we are using and I will be in a position to make a statement on these annual charges when we have achieved financial close. The asset value of the refurbished building, which may be different from the capital construction costs, will be recorded in the Departments balance sheet.
In addition to the capital construction costs, the implementation of the UK Supreme Court will incur other costs such as DCA professional adviser fees, the project team costs and the non-capital element of the fit out costs including loose furniture, IT services and library books.
The Middlesex Crown Court will cease sitting on 31 March 2007. We have developed detailed transition plans in conjunction with the judiciary to manage the relocation of court work, judges and staff. The intention is to create extra courts at Isleworth Crown Court. On 21 March 2006 the Planning Committee of the London borough of Hounslow refused planning permission for these extra courtrooms. On 25 May, an appeal was lodged
against this decision and our appeal is due to be heard on the 15 and16 November 2006. We expect to hear the outcome of our appeal early in the new year.
Once we have reached financial close with Kier Group plc I propose to make a further statement describing the costs involved in setting up the Supreme Court and the re-provision of existing Crown Court facilities currently operating from Middlesex Guildhall.
The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Mr. Adam Ingram): The Ministry of Defence has today launched the Defence Technology Strategy (DTS) setting out the technologies that are most important to the future provision of military capability for our Armed Forces. The DTS builds on the Defence Industrial Strategy White Paper published in December last year and has been developed in close collaboration with industry and academia. It outlines the research and development priorities on which we must work together to encourage innovation in support of the UKs front line forces.
This strategy will help MOD and Industry plan future investment in research and development (R&D). It identifies clear R&D priorities, including those areas in which we believe it is important to maintain sovereign control. It highlights opportunities for collaboration and addresses long-term support to the UKs science and technology skill base.
Included in the strategy are several initiatives to support and encourage innovation and the science and engineering skill base in the UK. These include a competition of ideas, which will provide rapid funding for innovative research proposals from industry and academia in areas of particular importance to defence, and a grand challenge to produce an autonomous or semi autonomous system designed to detect, identify, monitor and report a comprehensive range of physical threats in a complex urban environment. Both have been designed to stimulate free-ranging innovation from the widest possible science and technology base.
The Defence Technology Strategy sets clear direction for the future and is the foundation for a vibrant and innovative research and development relationship between MOD, industry and academia. It will ensure that the UK Armed Forces continue to benefit from the highest level of technological research and innovation.
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Defence (Derek Twigg): The Ministry of Defence (MOD) welcomes the courts judgment that the schemes criteria do not directly discriminate on the grounds of race and that it was legitimate to limit payments to those with a close link to the United Kingdom.
The MOD accepts the courts finding that the way the Government chose to define that close linkintroducing the birthlink criteriainvolved unjustified indirect discrimination against those of non-United Kingdom national origins. We will not be seeking leave to appeal.
The purpose of the birthlink criteria was to provide an administratively manageable way of paying more British subjects, not fewer. It was never the MODs intention to discriminate against Mrs. Elias or anyone else on grounds of race. Nonetheless, in the light of the courts judgment, which the MOD accepts, the Department recognises the hurt unintentionally caused to Mrs. Elias personally and will pay her the compensation that the court ordered, plus interest. Mrs. Elias had already received an ex-gratia payment of £10,000 under the scheme pursuant to changes to the schemes eligibility criteria that were announced in March of this year. Those changes meant that those who have resided in the UK for at least 20 years between the end of the second world war and November 2000, when the scheme was introduced, qualify for a payment.
Civilian claims submitted after the High Court judgment on 7 July 2005 have been, and will continue to be, decided only on the basis of the other, residence-based, criteria, based either on normal residence in the United Kingdom before the war and return to United Kingdom shortly afterwards, or at least 20 years residence in the United Kingdom between 1945 and November 2000.
The Minister for Europe (Mr. Geoffrey Hoon): I wish to make a statement to the House on the Gibraltar trilateral forum, following the successful ministerial meeting in Cordoba, Spain on 18 September 2006.
In consultation with the Government of Gibraltar the trilateral forum was established in December 2004 by the former Foreign Secretary my right hon. Friend the Member for Blackburn (Mr. Straw), and Spanish Foreign Minister Señor Miguel Ángel Moratinos. It was hailed at the time as a major breakthrough for relations between the UK, Spain and Gibraltar. It gave rise to genuine optimism that we could set our historic differences aside and discuss practical issues that affect the people of Spain and Gibraltar.
I am delighted that, after almost two years of intense negotiations, the trilateral forum has borne fruit. For the first time the UK, Spain and Gibraltar have negotiated together a three-way package of agreements. These demonstrate that we can work together to make a real difference to the quality of lives of people in the region despite our well-known differences on the question of sovereignty.
A key feature in the forum is the full and equal role the Government of Gibraltar plays. Chief Minister
Peter Caruana has shown considerable leadership and vision and has shaped the direction of the talks and negotiated constructively throughout, including on issues that were particularly sensitive for Gibraltar. It would also be remiss of me not to pay a particular tribute to Señor Moratinos and the Spanish Government. He and Prime Minister Zapatero have, I believe, shown courage and foresight in pursuing a more constructive policy towards Gibraltar.
The airport agreement will benefit the people and businesses of Gibraltar. Gibraltars exclusion from EU aviation legislation is to be lifted and Spanish airspace restrictions will end; there will be a new terminal; and a greater choice of flights from Gibraltar, including to Spain and other European destinations. This will be a huge economic boost to Gibraltar. All sides are agreed that the arrangements on the airport have no implications for sovereignty, jurisdiction, or control.
On the border crossing the introduction of red and green channels into Spain and two-lane access into Gibraltar should improve pedestrian and traffic flows. This is potentially a key development for the many people who cross the frontier for work, business and leisure reasons.
On telecoms, Spains recognition of Gibraltars international dialling code +350 will improve cross- border communications. And Gibraltarian mobile phone users will shortly be able to use their mobiles to dial home when travelling in Spain.
Finally, a settlement to the long-running question of pensions payments for former Spanish workers in Gibraltar will, I believe, bring to an end a dispute which has been a priority for the current Spanish Government. As part of this settlement Spain has agreed not to charge the pensioners healthcare costs to the UK (as they were entitled to do under EC directives). This agreement therefore represents good value for money to the UK taxpayer.
The next step is of course to make the trilateral agreement work. The full and timely implementation of the agreement is vital as people will not judge the forum by its statements, but by what happens on the ground. I can promise that the UK Government will spare no effort to deliver the agreements we have reached. I am entirely confident that the Governments of Spain and Gibraltar will also implement the Cordoba agreements. They are a package and all sides are agreed that they must be implemented as a whole; there can be no cherry-picking.
We will now look to build on these agreements to explore future areas of practical cooperation. With continued commitment from all sides, I believe we can make the tensions that have for far too long characterised cross-border relations a thing of the past.
The Minister for Trade (Mr. Ian McCartney): The Foreign and Commonwealth Offices Command Paper response to the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Report on East Asia (Seventh Report of Session 2005-06) was published today. Copies have been placed in the Library of the House. A copy of the report is also available on the Foreign and Commonwealth Office website at: www.fco.gov.uk.
The Government are responding to the 22 recommendations made by the Committee on areas such as prescription charges, car parking charges, dental charges, on eligibility for NHS sight tests and on the hospital travel costs scheme.
As part of the response, the Government are committing to an internal review of prescription charges and a further statement will be made to the House following the review prior to the summer recess next year.
The Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Nationality (Mr. Liam Byrne): I have made an authorisation under section 19D of the Race Relations Act 1976 as amended, to enable immigration officers and entry clearance officers to grant leave to enter or entry clearance in a form which permits the holder to work in the United Kingdom to participate in the UK-China Graduate Work Experience Programme otherwise than in accordance with the immigration rules.
Developing relationships with the likely future leaders of Chinese business will be to the benefit of the UK. China is the fastest growing major economy in the world and is therefore a critically important country in terms of the global economy and consequently to the UKs future position in the global economy. It is in the
UKs interest to do everything possible now to develop links with the Chinese economy.
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mr. John Hutton): I am publishing today the Opportunity for AllEighth Annual Report 2006 (CM 6915-i and CM 6915-ii) of the Department for Work and Pensions. It will provide a progress update on the Departments seventh annual report published in October 2005 (Cm 6673). The report sets out our strategy for tackling poverty and social exclusion, and reports on the indicators used to monitor progress. Copies have been placed in the Library.
We are committed to achieving a fairer, more inclusive society where nobody is held back by disadvantage or lack of opportunity. I am pleased to report significant and sustained progress has been made on a range of our indicators. forty of our 59 indicators now show an improving trend over time.
Overall, there are now 700,000 fewer children living in relative low income than in 1998-99 (before housing costs) and around 440,000 fewer children in households where no one works. There are 2.5 million more people in work, with unemployment the lowest for 30 years. Ethnic minority groups and disabled people have seen improvements in their employment rates since last year.
This years Opportunity for All report consists of two documentsOur Strategy and the Indicators document. The strategy document presents an overview in the life-cycle approach, clearly setting out our progress to date. It draws on relevant departmental five year strategies and other key documents, setting out how we will achieve both our short and longer term targets. A chapter on child poverty sets out the cross-Government strategy which will deliver on our aim to halve and eradicate child poverty and to ensure all children have the best start in life. It outlines how many, and which, children experience poverty, and its consequences. It describes the progress that has been made so far to address child poverty.
The Indicators document provides an important annual audit that monitors the progress of the Governments strategy to tackle poverty and social exclusion. These reflect the multidimensional nature of poverty and social exclusion at different stages in peoples lives, including health, education, housing, income and financial well-being.
There is, of course, still more to do. Poverty and social exclusion are deep-rooted problems that have built up over many years. Tackling the root causes of poverty takes time as well as commitment and investment. It also requires a partnership across all sectors of society which recognises that rights and responsibilities go hand in
hand. However, this report shows that we are now starting to see real signs of equally deep-rooted and lasting change that will help individuals and communities take control of their lives and break the intergenerational cycle of poverty and deprivation.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|