Previous Section Index Home Page

23 Oct 2006 : Column 1646W—continued


23 Oct 2006 : Column 1647W

23 Oct 2006 : Column 1648W

Table 4: Claimants of jobseeker’s allowance; Stroud district council, Gloucestershire and the United Kingdom September 1996 to September 2006
Stroud district council Gloucestershire United Kingdom
September Level Proportion (%)( 1) Level Proportion (%)( 1) Level Proportion (%)( 1)

1996

2,451

4

14,081

4

2,103,721

6

1997

1,629

3

9,541

3

1,513,537

4

1998

1,262

2

8,079

2

1,334,273

4

1999

1,263

2

7,493

2

1,223,954

3

2000

1,081

2

6,756

2

1,042,804

3

2001

1,002

2

5,918

2

940,373

3

2002

938

2

6,179

2

936,214

3

2003

1,000

2

5,962

2

922,136

3

2004

849

1

5,044

2

827,833

2

2005

855

1

5,343

2

871,532

2

2006

898

1

6,013

2

952,909

3

(1) Percentage of resident working age population. Mid-2004 population estimates used for September 2005 and September 2006 proportions
Source:
Jobcentre Plus administrative systems

Life Expectancy

Kitty Ussher: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the life expectancy is in Burnley constituency for (a) men and (b) women; and what it was in (i) 1997 and (ii) 2001. [95707]

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 23 October 2006:

Table 1: Period life expectancy at birth( 1) , Burnley local authority district( 2) , 1996-98, 2001-02 and 2002-04( 3)
Years of life
Male Female
Year( 3) Life expectancy 95 per cent. confidence interval( 4) Life expectancy 95 per cent. confidence interval( 4)

1996-98

72.0

(71.3-72.7)

77.7

(77.0-78.4)

2000-02

74.4

(73.7-75.2)

78.6

(77.9-79.3)

2002-04

74.1

(73.4-74.8)

78.2

(77.4-78.9)

(1) Period life expectancy at birth is an estimate of the average number of years a newborn baby would survive if he or she experienced the area's age-specific mortality rates for that time period throughout his or her life. The figure reflects mortality among those living in the area in each time period, rather than mortality among those born in each area. It is not therefore the number of years a baby born in the area in each time period could actually expect to live, both because the death rates of the area are likely to change in the future and because many of those born in the area will live elsewhere for at least some part of their lives. (2) Using local authority boundaries as of 2005 for all the years shown. (3) Three year rolling averages, based on deaths registered in each year and mid-year population estimates. (4) Confidence intervals are a measure of the statistical precision of an estimate and show the range of uncertainty around the estimated figure. Calculations based on small numbers of events are often subject to random fluctuations. As a general rule, if the confidence interval around one figure overlaps with the interval around another, we cannot say with certainty that there is more than a chance difference between the two figures.

Mr. Hoyle: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what average life expectancy is in Chorley constituency; and what it was in (a) 1997 and (b) 2001. [96348]

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Karen Dunnell, dated 23 October 2006:


23 Oct 2006 : Column 1649W

23 Oct 2006 : Column 1650W

Table 1: Period life expectancy at birth( 1) , Chorley local authority district( 2) ,1996-98, 2000-02 and 2002-04( 3)
Years of life
Male Female
Year( 3) Life expectancy 95 per cent. confidence interval( 4) Life expectancy 95 per cent. confidence interval( 4)

1996-98

74.1

(73.4—74.8)

79.1

(78.4—79.7)

2000-02

75.6

(75.0—76.3)

79.5

(78.9—80.2)

2002-04

76.1

(75.5—76.7)

80.0

(79.4—80.6)

(1) Period life expectancy at birth is an estimate of the average number of years a newborn baby would survive if he or she experienced the area’s age-specific mortality rates for that time period throughout his or her life. The figure reflects mortality among those living in the area in each time period, rather than mortality among those born in each area. It is not therefore the number of years a baby born in the area in each time period could actually expect to live, both because the death rates of the area are likely to change in the future and because many of those born in the area will live elsewhere for at least some part of their lives.
(2) Using local authority boundaries as of 2005 for all the years shown.
(3) Three year rolling averages, based on deaths registered in each year and mid-year population estimates.
(4) Confidence intervals are a measure of the statistical precision of an estimate and show the range of uncertainty around the estimated figure. Calculations based on small numbers of events are often subject to random fluctuations. As a general rule, if the confidence interval around one figure overlaps with the interval around another, we cannot say with certainty that there is more than a chance difference between the two figures.

North Sea Revenues

Mr. Salmond: To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer what the projections are for North Sea revenues as in table C9 of Budget 2006 in (a) cash and (b) real terms for each year given in the table. [95219]

John Healey: I refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave the hon. Member for Dundee East (Stewart Hosie) on 12 October 2006, Official Report, column 877W.

Parliamentary Questions

Mr. Laws: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many draft answers to parliamentary questions tabled by the hon. Member for Yeovil for answer by the Chancellor of the Exchequer have been (a) approved and (b) amended by the Chairman of HM Revenue and Customs since January 2006; and if he will make a statement. [96006]

Dawn Primarolo: I refer the hon. Gentleman to the answer I gave him on 16 October 2006, Official Report, column 1070W.

Population Statistics

Mr. Blunt: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what percentage of the population of (a) England, (b) Surrey, (c) Reigate constituency and (d) the borough of Reigate and Banstead is aged over 65 years. [96329]

John Healey: The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician who has been asked to reply.

Letter from Colin Mowl, dated 23 October 2006:

Table 1: Total population and percentage of population of those aged 65 and over Mid-2005 population estimate
Local Authority Total population Population aged 65+ Percentage population aged 65+

England

50,431

8,058,100

16.0

Surrey

1,075,500

176,900

16.4

Borough of Reigate and Banstead

127,200

20,700

16.3

Note: Figures are rounded to the nearest 100. Source:
Office for National Statistics

Table 2: Total population and percentage of population of those aged 65 and over, based on the 2001 Census
Parliamentary constituency Total population Population aged 65+ Percentage population aged 65+

Reigate constituency

87,665

14,569

16.6

Note: The data have been taken from KS02 in the Census 2001 Report for Parliamentary Constituencies which is available in the House of Commons Library. Source: Office for National Statistics.

Post Office Card Accounts

Mr. Llwyd: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer how many tax credit claims in Wales are paid by HM Revenue and Customs into Post Office Card Accounts; and how many of these account holders are also receiving other benefits. [95766]

Dawn Primarolo: The information requested is not available.


Next Section Index Home Page