Previous Section Index Home Page

30 Oct 2006 : Column 216W—continued


Pupils at the end of key stage 4
2006 2005

Number of pupils at the end of key stage 4

644,658

633,414

Attempts in physics

48,752

45,437

Percentage attempting physics

7.6

7.2

Attempts in chemistry

49,217

45,929

Percentage attempting chemistry

7.6

7.3

Attempts in biology

51,758

48,347

Percentage attempting biology

8.0

7.6

Attempts in physics, chemistry and biology

46,359

43,032

Percentage attempting physics, chemistry and biology

7.2

6.8


Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of pupils from independent schools achieved five or more GCSEs at grades A* to C including English and mathematics in each year since 1996. [96518]

Jim Knight: The following table shows the percentage of 15-year-old pupils in independent schools achieving five or more GCSEs or equivalents at grades A* to C including English and mathematics.

Independent school pupils achieving 5+ A*-C at GCSE or equivalent including English and mathematics
Percentage

1996

75.7

1997

75.8

1998

75.9

1999

82.5

2000

83.2

2001

83.0

2002

78.5

2003

77.8

2004

76.7

2005

73.9

2006

68.3

Note: Data for 2006 are provisional. Data for all other years are final.

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what proportion of pupils achieved seven or more GCSEs at A* to C in each year since 1996. [96520]

Jim Knight: The information requested is shown in the following table:

Number and percentage of 15-year-old pupils( 1) achieving the following GCSEs or equivalents
7 or more A*-C grades
Number Percentage

1996

175,509

34.1

1997

177,338

34.8

1998

178,848

35.3

1999

190,776

33.5

2000

196,402

34.7

2001

245,460

39.5

2002

255,352

40.7

2003

269,471

42.9

2004

283,863

43.8

2005

296,889

46.6

2006

313,648

48.3

(1 )Aged 15 at the start of the academic year i.e. 31 August.

Graduate Employment

David Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what recent discussions he has had with university vice-chancellors on improving the employment prospects of graduates. [96878]

Bill Rammell [holding answer 24 October 2006]: Such issues arise regularly in the many conversations that both the Secretary of State and I have with colleagues in the higher education sector.

Most recently graduate employability was also included in wider discussions on a visit to Cambridge University on 6 September, Liverpool John Moores University on 10 October and in a speech the Secretary of State recently gave to Vice Chancellors at the Universities UK conference in Exeter on 14 September 2006.

Both the Secretary of State and I continue to encourage and support developments in the HE sector that help UK graduates compete effectively in the domestic and global employment market. These include the inclusion in degree programmes of elements of work-based learning and high-level “world of work” skills such as business awareness and negotiation. My response to my hon. Friend’s question, 25 October 2006, Official Report, columns 1913-14W, contains some relevant examples of this.

International GCSE

Mr. Gibb: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills how many pupils in maintained
30 Oct 2006 : Column 217W
schools sat the International GCSE examination in English in 2006. [95198]

Jim Knight: The Department does not collect data on the number of pupils taking International GCSE examinations.

Mature Students

Sir Peter Soulsby: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what estimate he has made of the number of mature students born before 1979 undertaking a foundation degree who now require a GCSE or equivalent in science to apply to enter the teaching profession; and if he will make a statement. [97908]

Bill Rammell: We do not have information on those undertaking a foundation degree who intend to apply to enter the teaching profession and do not hold a GCSE or equivalent in science.

Nursery Education

Mr. Oaten: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what advice has been given to education authorities on the level of grants they should provide to private sector providers of nursery education; and if he will make a statement. [94904]

Beverley Hughes: Local authorities receive funding for all pre-16 provision through the dedicated schools grant (DSG). This is a ring-fenced DfES grant provided to local authorities to fund educational provision in all types of setting, including private, voluntary and independent settings offering free early education.

Local authorities are responsible for deciding how best to apply the funding across different age groups and between different types of provider taking account of local needs and circumstances. The “Code of Practice on the Provision of Free Nursery Education places for Three and Four-Year-Olds” makes clear that local authorities should fund all providers delivering the free early education entitlement equitably, fairly and transparently.

Partially Selective Schools

Mr. Gauke: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills pursuant to the answer of 23 October 2006, Official Report, column 1565W, on partially selective schools, if he will list the 38 schools to which he refers. [97538]

Jim Knight: Further to the answer of 23 October, I attach a list of 38 schools we are aware of which operate forms of ‘pre-existing’ partial selection that it would not now be lawful to introduce. This is not a
30 Oct 2006 : Column 218W
definitive list as admission arrangements are determined locally and we do not collate information on every school.

Local authority School

Barnet

Mill Hill School

Bexley

Erith School

Buckinghamshire

Waddesdon CE School

Croydon

Edenham High School

Riddlesdown High School

Archbishop Lanfranc School

Shirley High School

Dudley

Old Swinford Hospital School

Havering

Coopers' Company and Coburn School

Sacred Heart of Mary Girls School

Hertfordshire

Chancellor's School

Hertfordshire and Essex High School

St Clement Danes School

Queens School

Rickmansworth School

Bishop Stortford High School

Dame Alice Owen's School

Watford Grammar School (Boys)

Watford Grammar School (Girls)

Parmiter's School

Kent

Homewood School

Archbishops School

Canterbury High School

Chaucer School

Westlands School

Kingston upon Thames

Holy Cross School

Lambeth

London Nautical School

Dunraven School

Lancashire

Ripley St Thomas CE High School

Lincolnshire

Spilsbury King Edward VI School

Liverpool

Archbishop Blanch CE High School

St Hilda’s CE High School

St Margarets CE High School

Wandsworth

Burntwood School

Ernest Bevin School

Chestnut Grove School

Graveney School

Warwickshire

Ashlawn School


30 Oct 2006 : Column 219W

Performance Monitoring

Mr. Willis: To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Skills what (a) performance management and (b) key performance indicators have been put in place to monitor the service quality for the (i) key stage 3 strategy and (ii) strategic improvement partner initiative; and what external scrutiny of each will take place. [97373]

Jim Knight [holding answer 26 October 2006]: The services provided by the national strategies, whether as part of the secondary strategy (formerly the key stage 3 strategy) or specific programmes like school improvement partners (SIPs) are set out annually in the national strategies annual plan. The Department has set in place governance arrangements for monitoring the quality and progress of specific programmes set out in the annual plan. The detailed key indicators measuring the performance of the national strategies’ contractor are commercially confidential.

In the case of the SIPs programme, there is a quality assurance framework covering both the initial accreditation and impact of SIPs. This framework
30 Oct 2006 : Column 220W
together with the progress reports have been shared with all local authorities (LAs) who are responsible for the delivery of the SIPs programme, as well as representatives of the teaching profession who form part of a wider consultative group.

The Department uses a variety of mechanisms for evaluating quality, progress and impact of the national strategies including: the strategies’ own quality assurance processes; Ofsted; the Prime Minister’s delivery unit on specific aspects of delivery; and externally commissioned evaluations from research organisations such as the National Foundation for Education Research (NfER).


Next Section Index Home Page