Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
7 Nov 2006 : Column 1364Wcontinued
Number of persons | ||||
2003 | 2004 | |||
Drug and offence type | Found guilty | Maximum sentence (14 years) | Found guilty | Maximum sentence (14 years) |
(1) As the same person may be found guilty of more than one offence, rows cannot be added together to produce totals. (2) Cannabis was reclassified as a class C drug from January 2004. |
Number of persons | ||||
2003 | 2004 | |||
Drug and offence type | Found guilty | Maximum sentence (14 years) | Found guilty | Maximum sentence (14 years) |
(1) As the same person may be found guilty of more than one offence, rows cannot be added together to produce totals. (2) Cannabis was reclassified as a class C drug from January 2004. (3) GHB became controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 in July 2003. |
Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) when he expects the E-Crime Co-ordination Unit to be established; [97805]
(2) what assessment he has made of how the proposed e-Crime Co-ordination Unit will (a) operate and (b) co-operate with the (i) Metropolitan police, (ii) Serious Organised Crime Agency and (iii) National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination Centre; and how he expects the E-Crime Co-ordination Unit to be (A) formed, (B) operated and (C) incorporated into (1) Scotland Yard, (2) the Serious Organised Crime Agency and (3) the National Infrastructure Security Co-ordination Centre. [97801]
Mr. Coaker: I understand that ACPO are carrying out some work to determine what capacity there is in police forces in England and Wales to deal with e-crime and what gaps exist. Part of that work involves scoping what value might be added by some form of co-ordination unit. I will meet ACPO representatives to discuss our response to e-crime, as soon as the initial findings of this work are ready. As part of that discussion, we will consider with ACPO the role that SOCA, the Metropolitan police and other police forces, NISCC and other relevant organisations play in relation to e-crime now and in the future.
Mr. Andrew Turner: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department pursuant to his answer of 2 May 2006, Official Report, column 445W, on general election leaflets, when the Minister for Policing will write to the hon. Member for the Isle of Wight. [85957]
Mr. McNulty [holding answer 17 July 2006]: I wrote to the hon. Gentleman on 7 November.
Mr. Redwood: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many people seeking entry to the UK in the last three months have been refused entry on the grounds that they might (a) commit criminal acts and (b) incite others to do so. [95686]
Mr. Byrne: The information requested is not available.
Mark Pritchard: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what research has been undertaken into how to tackle ethnic gangs in England and Wales. [92485]
Mr. Coaker: There has been very little robust research undertaken on how to tackle gangs in England and Wales and the information which has been published tends to provide information about how to tackle gang related activity in general rather than providing specific recommendations on how to tackle ethnic gangs.
A review of the international published robust evidence on how to reduce gang related violence provides some recommendations on how to tackle gang related violence in general. The report is called: Evidence Based Approaches to Reducing Gang Violence: a rapid evidence assessment for Aston and Handsworth Operational Group (2004) Butler, G., Hodgkinson, J., Holmes, E. and Marshall, S and it is available online on the Government Social Research website.
Ms Butler: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department which countries do not have to provide prima facie evidence when applying for the extradition of a person from the United Kingdom. [97738]
Joan Ryan: There are currently 48 territories that do not have to provide prima facie evidence in support of extradition requests made to the UK. These are:
Albania
Andorra
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Israel
Next Section | Index | Home Page |