Previous Section Index Home Page

8 Nov 2006 : Column 1800W—continued

Audiology Services

Sandra Gidley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health (1) how many cochlear implant operations were performed in each NHS trust in each of the last three years; [97436]

(2) what assessment she has made of the extent to which NHS trusts limit the supply of cochlear implant procedures. [97437]

Mr. Ivan Lewis: A table showing the number of cochlear implant operations performed in each national health service trust has been placed in the Library. The data available are for 2002-03, 2003-04 and 2004-05.

It is for primary care trusts to determine the allocation of resources for their local population based on local need. NHS spend will increase on average by 7.1 per cent. a year over and above inflation—a total increase over the period of 23 per cent. in real terms. Over three years this will take the total spent on the NHS in England from £70 billion in 2004-05 to almost £93 billion in 2007-08.

Autism and Childhood Cancers

Dr. Kumar: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the risks to (a) babies born through IVF and (b) other babies of developing (i) autism and (ii) childhood cancers. [99896]

Caroline Flint: The Department has made no assessment of the likelihood of a child developing autism or cancer or whether that likelihood is increased if the child is conceived using in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, the regulatory body responsible for licensing the provision of IVF in the United Kingdom, considers that IVF is a fundamentally safe technique. Although there have been a number of studies looking at the links between IVF and a range of medical or genetic conditions, there is no current body of evidence to indicate that IVF is unsafe.

Bedford Hospital

Alistair Burt: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many jobs are expected to be lost at Bedford Hospital NHS Trust in 2006-07. [98651]

Ms Rosie Winterton: This information is not available centrally.

It is the responsibility of strategic health authorities to analyse their local situation and develop plans, in liaison with their local national health service trusts, to deliver high quality NHS services and take action as required to deliver these services.


8 Nov 2006 : Column 1801W

Birth Statistics

Mr. Iain Wright: To ask the Secretary of State for Health pursuant to the answer of 30 October 2006, Official Report, column 158W, on birth statistics, how many women with a Hartlepool address gave birth at (a) the University Hospital of Hartlepool, (b) the University Hospital of North Tees, (c) the James Cook University Hospital, (d) Darlington Memorial Hospital, (e) Bishop Auckland Hospital, (f) City Hospitals Sunderland, (g) another hospital and (h) home in each of the last five years. [99860]

Mr. Ivan Lewis: This information is not collected centrally.

Blind/Partially Sighted People

Mr. Baron: To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether her Department has assessed the reasons for the change in the number of people registered as (a) blind and (b) partially sighted in England between 2002-03 and 2005-06; and if she will make a statement. [100249]

Mr. Ivan Lewis: Registration of blindness is voluntary so the register does not necessarily include all people who are blind. This, together with some uncertainty about how regularly councils update their registers, means the information is not precise. Some councils have recently introduced new computer systems for registration and the data cleansing process has a decrease in the number of new registrations.

Bone Scans

Julia Goldsworthy: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what the waiting time target is for a routine bone scan; and what the average waiting time was for a routine bone scan in each year since 2001. [94444]

Andy Burnham: Historically the Department has not kept diagnostic waiting time data. A new national data collection commenced in January 2006 and the median waiting time for a DEXA scan from the August 2006, monthly collection (published on 18 October 2006) is 5.4 weeks.

Breast Cancer

Mr. Morley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health whether she has any plans to extend the use of ultrasound scans to detect breast cancer; and if she will make a statement. [97846]

Ms Rosie Winterton: There is some evidence of the benefit of ultrasound in the primary screening of younger women at increased risk of breast cancer. However, ultrasound does produce high false positive rates and while ultrasound is accepted as a very effective technique for further assessment of abnormalities detected by mammogram there are no plans to extend the use of ultrasound scans to detect breast cancer.


8 Nov 2006 : Column 1802W

In their ‘Improving outcomes in breast cancer guidance’, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has recommended that a combination of clinical examination, mammography/ultrasound and image-guided core biopsy or fine needle aspiration, known together as the triple assessment, should be available for women with suspected breast cancer at a single visit. Both mammography and ultrasound imaging should be available.

Patrick Mercer: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what progress her Department has made in reducing waiting times for genetic tests for breast cancer in Newark constituency over the last 12 months. [99883]

Ms Rosie Winterton: The Department does not collect data centrally on waiting times for genetic tests for inherited forms of breast cancer

However, this Government do recognise that some patients have experienced long waits for genetic tests in the past and this will have caused stress and anxiety. This is unacceptable.

The genetics White Paper ‘Our Inheritance, Our Future—realising the potential of genetics in the NHS’, published in June 2003, committed up to £18 million for NHS genetics laboratories in England. This major investment is boosting capacity and supporting modernisation in genetics laboratories, thus helping them meet the rising demand for genetic tests.

To ensure that this investment resulted in real patient benefit, the White Paper set out new standards for genetic test turn around times, to be achieved by the end of 2006. These are:

This money was allocated during the last two financial years (2004-05 and 2005-06) and laboratories are working hard to get their new facilities up to speed to meet these standards.

The Department is monitoring molecular genetics laboratories' progress through the commissioners of genetic services. On current plans the laboratories serving the population in the Newark area expect to be delivering these standards for genetic tests for breast cancer by the end of 2006.

Burnley General Hospital

Kitty Ussher: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how many (a) doctors and (b) nurses are employed in Burnley General Hospital; and how many there were in (i) 1997 and (ii) 2001. [95663]

Ms Rosie Winterton: The information is not available in the requested format. Data relating to the trusts which Burnley General Hospital has been part of are set out in the following table.


8 Nov 2006 : Column 1803W
National health service hospital and community health services (HCHS): Medical and dental staff and qualified nursing staff by specified organisation—as at 30 September each specified year
Number (headcount)
1997 2001 2005

Qualified nursing staff

Total specified organisations

2,642

2,619

3,656

Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care

1,260

1,206

n/a

Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust

1,382

1,413

n/a

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

2,258

Lancashire Care NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

1,398

Medical and dental staff

Total for specified organisations

464

521

752

Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust

239

252

n/a

Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care

225

269

n/a

Lancashire Care NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

138

East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust

n/a

n/a

614

n/a = not applicable
Notes:
Relevant Mergers History:
1. Mental Health services from Blackburn Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust (RMB) and Burnley Healthcare, NHS Trust (REU), along with staff from Blackpool, Wyre and Fyde Community Health NHS trust (mental health services), Chorley and South Ribble NHS Trust (mental health services), Communicare NHS Trust (psychology and drugs services), Guild Community Healthcare NHS Trust, and North Sefton and West Lancashire Community NHS Trust, merged to form Lancashire Care NHS Trust (RW5) in 2002.
2. In 2003-04 the remainder of Blackburn Hyndburn and Ribble Valley Health Care NHS Trust (RMB) and Burnley Healthcare NHS Trust (REU) merged to for East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust (RXR).
Sources:
1. The Information Centre for health and social care, medical and dental workforce census
2. The Information Centre for health and social care, non-medical workforce census

Cancer and Mental Health Services

Lynne Jones: To ask the Secretary of State for Health how much has been spent per capita in each primary care trust on (a) cancer services and (b) mental health services in each of the last five years. [96814]

Ms Rosie Winterton: Estimates of primary care trust expenditure on cancer and tumours and mental health are provided by the programme budgeting returns. At present, data are only available for the financial years 2003-04 and 2004-05, as per the old primary care trust boundaries.


8 Nov 2006 : Column 1804W

Details of the net spend for each primary care trust in 2003-04 and 2004-05 on cancer and tumours and mental health, in terms of expenditure per 100,000 unified weighted population have been placed in the Library.

Further analysis is available at the website address:

Cervical Cancer

Sandra Gidley: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what estimate she has made of the number of unreadable cervical smear tests since the implementation of liquid based cytology for cervical cancer screening. [95223]

Ms Rosie Winterton: Following the evaluation of a Government funded pilot study of Liquid Based Cytology (LBC), the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) concluded in October 2003 that this new technology should be rolled out across the national health service (NHS). NICE concluded LBC will reduce the number of inadequate tests, meaning around 300,000 women a year will not have to go through the anxiety of being re-tested every year just because their slide could not be read.

It will take five years to implement LBC across England as all staff who read the tests or take the samples from women will have to be retrained. As at September 2006, of the 142 laboratories that process cervical screening samples 67 have fully implemented LBC and 35 are intending to implement LBC by March 2007.

The latest year for which statistics on the programme are available is 2004-05, which was at the start of the roll-out of LBC implementation. We have therefore yet to see a major reduction in the number of inadequate tests across the whole programme. However, we have seen a significant reduction in the pilot sites, which is shown in the following table:

Percentage
Pilot site Inadequate test results 2000-01 Inadequate test results 2004-05

Southmead Hospital (Bristol)

9.7

0.9

Royal Victoria Infirmary (Newcastle)

9.1

0.4

Norfolk and Norwich

7.5

1.5


We would expect to start seeing an effect of LBC on the rate of inadequate samples across the whole programme when the statistics for 2005-06 are published in December 2006.

Chaplaincy Services

Peter Luff: To ask the Secretary of State for Health what assessment she has made of the compatibility of the actions being taken by Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust in relation to chaplaincy services with the guidelines in “NHS Chaplaincy: meeting the religious and spiritual needs of patients”, published in November 2003; and if she will make a statement. [100116]


8 Nov 2006 : Column 1805W

Ms Rosie Winterton: The Department remains committed to the guidance “NHS Chaplaincy: Meeting the Religious and Spiritual Needs of Patients and Staff” issued to national health service trusts in November 2003 about patients’ access to spiritual care, irrespective of their faith or beliefs.

NHS trusts are responsible for delivering religious and spiritual care in a way that meets the diverse needs of their patients. How they do so is a matter for local determination, particularly as these arrangements vary considerably now. It is not for Ministers to intervene in these matters.


Next Section Index Home Page