Select Committee on Armed Forces Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 460-462)

GENERAL SIR MICHAEL WALKER

16 FEBRUARY 2006

  Q460  Mr Jones: But, General, it is not helped, is it, by certain senior retired generals and others perpetuating this myth? I work on the basis of facts and if people can actually pin it down and say that this has actually happened I am quite prepared then to address it, but this seems to me to be just the chattering classes amongst retired—

  General Sir Michael Walker: No, no. There is an element of that but I also do think that when you talk to the serving people who are implementing command at the moment, they also are very much more aware that there is a scrutiny out there of a nature and a quality that was not there before.

  Mr Jones: That is modern society, of course.

  Robert Key: Thank you very much. Could we end this session with one further area? The end of the arms plot will undoubtedly bring all sorts of benefits but there may be some unintended consequences.

  Q461  Bob Russell: The infantry will be moving into larger groupings in "super garrisons", which you will be very familiar with, of course. Do you think the changes will affect the administration of military justice? For example, with bigger groupings does it mean that the Commanding Officers will have more personnel under their command and will it therefore be necessary to delegate more powers to subordinates?

  General Sir Michael Walker: I do not think it will have the slightest impact. Remember that although there are new groupings the groupings are by and large administrative groupings with no role in the chain of command. The battalion will essentially be pretty much as it is today, so the link from the man at the front through his Commanding Officer up the chain will be pretty much as it is today. I do not think it will have any impact at all.

  Q462  Robert Key: General, in conclusion, is there any message that you would like to give the Committee in our deliberations?

  General Sir Michael Walker: No. I was worried to hear that there was a thought that we in the Service Chiefs did not think this was a good idea. I must expunge that absolutely. We have been very supportive of this notion. We want this Bill to go through. We think it delivers for our people a better legal act and process and it will bring coherence, it will bring understanding and it will bring harmony to our legal system, so we are for it. Please do not think otherwise.

  Robert Key: General Sir Michael Walker, thank you very much indeed for your time.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 9 May 2006