Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Supplementary evidence submitted by Ian G McCreath MBE, HM Coroner for North Northumberland

  I feel compelled to write to you again, following my attendance at the DCA Roadshow at Leeds on 8 July.

  I am very concerned as to the continuity of the Coronial Service to an acceptable level, from now until the new Coronial System is put into operation.

  It was made clear by the DCA Officials who spoke at the Roadshow that neither Coroners, Deputy Coroners, Assistant Deputy Coroners, Coroners' Officers nor Coroners' Clerical Staff can be regarded as having any continuing job security at all.

  Quite apart from the concerns being felt by Coroners, Deputy Coroners and Assistant Deputy Coroners, Coroners' Officers and clerical staff must clearly also be very concerned, for the following reasons.

  It was explained that the Government is in negotiations with Police Authority Representatives and with Local Government Associations over the possibility of all Coroners' Officers being employed in future by Local Authorities rather than Police Authorities.

  This means that at some unknown time in the future, many Coroners' Officers may be faced with having to apply for a new job with a Local Authority without any guarantee of success, not least because it was suggested that Local Authorities tend to favour existing employees when job applications are being considered.

  Secondly, it was stated that there would be no question of continuity of the employment of clerical staff who currently work in solicitors' offices within such offices, when the legislation is brought into force.

  There was a reference to such persons possibly being offered work in the new service, but then it was stated by the DCA Officials that there is no map in existence, as yet, showing any provisional boundaries for the new jurisdictions.

  In addition, there was significant disquiet on the part of the Local Government representatives present, as to where the money will come from for the purpose of their fulfilling their obligations under clause 33 of the Bill.

  Furthermore, the manner in which any future consultation with those presently working within the service is to be conducted was not made clear. This was perhaps the most distressing news of all.

  There must be a major concern that many, who carry out an extremely valuable service to the bereaved at present, will seek to leave the Coronial Service between now and April 2009 if opportunities for more secure employement elsewhere arise. Needless to say, replacing any such individuals would only be possible on temporary contracts of employment of unknown duration.

  I write this letter as one individual working in the service at present, greatly concerned for the future wellbeing of the Coronial Service in North Northumberland and the rest of England and Wales.

  I do not know whether this letter will be too late for use as evidence before the Constitutional Affairs Committee, but I would have no objection to it being used as such, if that is possible.

Ian G McCreath MBE

HM Coroner for North Northumberland

June 2006





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2006
Prepared 1 December 2006